This forum is for non aviation related topics, political debate, random thoughts, and everything else that just doesn't seem to fit in the normal forums. ALL FORUM RULES STILL APPLY.
fogghorn wrote:Thats clip's about as bogus as the one of the water skiing harvards.
Shit Fogghorn, you still on about the harvard thing being bogus. I saw that show with my own eyes. Trust me when I say there is nothing false about the airshow boys doing their thing.
---------- ADS -----------
Last edited by Springbok 2 on Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
HAPPY ARE THOSE WHO DREAM DREAMS AND ARE WILLING TO PAY THE PRICE TO SEE THEM COME TRUE: CARL BOENISH
Just look up the formula for hydroplaning - it doesn't mention how deep the water is. My friends who have done it claim you have to push the stick quite hard otherwise the water rejects you, and keep the power on!
That video is an old one, and its not a Boeing. Somebody's first attempt at a side-stick?
---------- ADS -----------
"What's it doing now?"
"Fly low and slow and throttle back in the turns."
xsbank wrote:Just look up the formula for hydroplaning - it doesn't mention how deep the water is. My friends who have done it claim you have to push the stick quite hard otherwise the water rejects you, and keep the power on!
That video is an old one, and its not a Boeing. Somebody's first attempt at a side-stick?
Exactly, and hydroplaning requires a runway or other surface inches below the water surface to work because it provide the obvious cushion effect. Try hydroplaning anything on wheels on open water, it does not work. If it did work, amphib aircraft that landed wheels down on water would simply have a normal landing rather than a violent upset. The drag coefficient for a solid object contacting water (like a pressurized chunk of rubber) increases exponentially with speed.
You have to see the full version of the video, where the announcer for the commercial comes on at the end. I can't remember if its for Heineken or some other beer, but its basically a joke that its the National Airline of some country "welcoming" a competing rugby team to its country to play its national team....
And its horribly fake. I can't even count how many times I've had friends send me this via email or PM, going "oh my god....this is scaaaaary".
Just look, I've never seen an A320 with Tundra tires before...and if you slam the nose down that hard, you bend the fuselage. Ask Skyservice.
Wow, dissenting opinions just dont wash around here, do they! I said that video that started this thread was bogus. I also believe the water skiing harvards are, like the guy from Missouri says "SHOW ME". I will believe it when I see it up close and personal. Maybe one of you rocket scientists could expain why amphib aircraft that contact water with wheels down, flip - immediately.
Sure: The rate of descent is too high and the main wheels of a amphib cause a rapid pitch down of the airplane (bad).
Where do you live? Come with me and we'll "wash the wheels".
Well, whatever. I think a few people need to understand that hydroplaning occurs when a cover of water up to a couple of cm deep is supported by a firm surface, like a runway. Alot of amphib's have flipped, landing on glassy water with wheels down, the same circumstance as the Harvards which would be contacting the surface at a very low rate of descent. Maybe one of the rocket scientists could tell me at what rate of descent the contact would cause an upset, because their must be a critical number here vs. speed, tire pressure, contact area etc, etc, blah, blah, when landing on deep water. Maybe the water surface for the harvards is supported by a road or something and is 4 inches deep, now that would make sense.
Nope, nothing under the water but more water. You go fast, step on the brakes and catch the pitch-down when you make contact. It's required training for anyone with over 500hrs in a Super Cub.
---------- ADS -----------
Last edited by Dog on Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yeah, I suppose standing on the brakes would create more water build up ahead of the tire and promote planing, or then again - would it compound the drag and flip that sucker over faster than you could say spit! Given the height that tail is in the air, the prop should be very close to hitting the water, why is there no spray around or immediately behind the prop?
---------- ADS -----------
Last edited by fogghorn on Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Has it occured to you that maybe the mains on a Super Cub/Harvard (pick any tail dragger) are in front of the CG while the mains on an amphib are behind the CG?
Big Pratt wrote:Has it occured to you that maybe the mains on a Super Cub/Harvard (pick any tail dragger) are in front of the CG while the mains on an amphib are behind the CG?
Regardless, the moment caused by the force of drag would result in a nose-down tendency. The wheels are below the C of G.
dog wrote:You go fast, step on the brakes and catch the pitch-down when you make contact.
---------- ADS -----------
Last edited by Clodhopper on Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
When Barefooting you keep your feet out infront of you to prevent from fliping over. You use your muscles and shift your weight to compansate. You could do this with power and the elevators in an aircraft.
If you move your feet aft you will be eating water before you can blink. Much like your amphib. I have never seen it done in a tricycle gear aircraft but I have heard of it.
Also remember generally when those amphibs come down on to the water with their gear hanging out, the pilots often don't know about it.