My sexy avatar...

quicksilver · Post by **quicksilver** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:26 pm

What happened to my sexy avatar? She was there, and then she was gone. Now I can't upload another one.... How long do I have to sit in the corner with my dunce cap on?

quick

Dust Devil · Post by **Dust Devil** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:07 pm

that was indeed a nice avatar.

Rowdy · Post by **Rowdy** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:47 pm

I'll second that!

The moderators look like they're having a LOT of fun lately

desksgo · Post by **desksgo** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:20 am

quicksilver wrote:What happened to my sexy avatar? She was there, and then she was gone. Now I can't upload another one.... How long do I have to sit in the corner with my dunce cap on?

quick

They felt that you went a bit out of your way in trying to turn other men on. Remember guys getting together in any facet to look at erotic images just leaves a room full of boners with nowhere to go.

Kilo-Kilo · Post by **Kilo-Kilo** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:01 am

They also pulled the whole "Who has the Best Avatar" thread sometime last week. I hope it wasn't because of me. They would have PM'd me I'm sure.

Rowdy · Post by **Rowdy** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:30 am

I saw that too! WTF over?

quicksilver · Post by **quicksilver** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 12:59 am

come on mods. Let me put up an avatar again!! I promise not to show as much side boob...

as per Peter Griffin.

quick.... Great 100th post... Give me my avatar back!

Walker · Post by **Walker** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:46 am

I will remind all here that in December of 1996 the supreme court ruled that exposed breasts (either male or female) were not to be considered indecent exposure… Then again this is a private server and as such its free to be run the way it is run!

water wings · Post by **water wings** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:23 am

well, i have been trying to find the male equivalent of your "sexy avatar" and no dice. I keep coming across interesting (!) sites in my attempts

I have a feeling that an avatar of a man with his bits hanging out would also be removed (amen for that!!), and in the interim would not be met with as much enthusiasm as your sweetheart...me thinks.

i am sure your next avatar will entertain us all - no pressure... i await patiently for amusement.

quicksilver · Post by **quicksilver** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:59 am

i am sure your next avatar will entertain us all - no pressure... i await patiently for amusement.

I'd love to put a new one up but I can't, its not an option any more. I guess its my punishment for being bad.

quick

just curious · Post by **just curious** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:08 am

I didn't pull it, but as estrogen levels rise in Aviation, it's not surprising that your non-aviation related Avatar faded away. For that matter, if Waterwings were to have posted a 'bits' avatar from her 'interesting' sites (hopefully not viewed from a workplace computer!), then they too would likely fade away as well.

Sorry.

water wings · Post by **water wings** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:53 am

just curious wrote: then they too would likely fade away as well.

i always thought it was better to burn out, not fade away - ah well.... good to know boy bits would be banned as well.
lesson 1: bits are for the ones you love...

not for avatars...

quicksilver · Post by **quicksilver** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:27 pm

I think I found a picture of water wings and just curious. Since they are so against me showing off the fantastic and beautiful female body and all..... BTW, there was nothing naked on my avatar.

quick

PS PLEASE TAKE THIS AS A JOKE....

Flybabe · Post by **Flybabe** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:10 am

Sorry quick, I have to agree with the decision ...

Lets not be nasty now

quicksilver · Post by **quicksilver** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:02 am

Lets not be nasty now

Come on flybabe, like I said before it was just a joke.

quick

Hedley · Post by **Hedley** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:13 am

It's fascinating how the awesomely powerful North American society, which invented the atomic bomb and thermonuclear weapons, can be so easily defeated by ... a nipple.

Yes, there is nothing more powerful than a nipple in North America. Don't believe me? Ask Janet Jackson, who had to pay a US$500,000 fine for exposing her boob on TV during a half-time show which glorified violence to the human body.

And I might point out that her nipple (gasp) wasn't even really exposed - it was covered up by a piece of jewelry.

But even the threat of a nipple exposure was enough to cause the awesomely powerful North American society to quake and recoil in shock and horror.

I hope Arab terrorists don't figure out that violence isn't the way to destroy North American society (after all, we glorify it and encourage it in our youngsters).

No, if Mulsim terrorists wanted to shut down North America, all they would have to do is put up pictures of nipples, and that would be it. Wall St would panic. NASDAQ would plummet. Because there is no defense against the nipple

niss · Post by **niss** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:02 am

It can be combatted with .......THE TASSLE!

. ._ · Post by **. ._** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:12 pm

Hedley wrote:It's fascinating how the awesomely powerful North American society, which invented the atomic bomb and thermonuclear weapons, can be so easily defeated by ... a nipple.

Yes, there is nothing more powerful than a nipple in North America. Don't believe me? Ask Janet Jackson, who had to pay a US$500,000 fine for exposing her boob on TV during a half-time show which glorified violence to the human body.

And I might point out that her nipple (gasp) wasn't even really exposed - it was covered up by a piece of jewelry.

But even the threat of a nipple exposure was enough to cause the awesomely powerful North American society to quake and recoil in shock and horror.

I hope Arab terrorists don't figure out that violence isn't the way to destroy North American society (after all, we glorify it and encourage it in our youngsters).

No, if Mulsim terrorists wanted to shut down North America, all they would have to do is put up pictures of nipples, and that would be it. Wall St would panic. NASDAQ would plummet. Because there is no defense against the nipple

quicksilver · Post by **quicksilver** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 6:05 pm

How much longer do I have to wait before I can have an avatar again?? I'm sorry the side boob offended so many, even though there is nothing wrong with a little side boob. Just ask Pam and her plastic surgeon. Or better yet, the supreme court has no problem with FULL tit... Come on already, cut me some slack.

wasYKnowFJ · Post by **wasYKnowFJ** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:41 am

Could not help but chuckle at this post, and at the state of society. Here is the picture from the FRONT PAGE of the National paper here. Pic is about 12" x 12", and front and center of every store.

I wish the AvCanada moderators could have spared me from this one.

http://www.fijitimes.com/images/artpics/45306thumbm.jpg

http://www.fijitimes.com/

jetway · Post by **jetway** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:09 am

The difference between the 2 pics is one is plain old natural nudity - the news -nothing to be ashamed of whilst the other is verging on pornography- the avatar (and she doesn't look a day over 15) Not that she wasn't lovely, albeit not suitable for an aviation forum, IMHO.

National geographic versus the Hoochi mamma.
My apologies for bringing this thread back to the top.

niss · Post by **niss** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:15 am

Hoochi mama, makes me want to talk about aviation.... Whats the old addage? A pilot talkes about flying when hes with women and women when hes flying....

I dont even know how to fly without a hard on anymore....

Dust Devil · Post by **Dust Devil** » Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:16 am

wasYKnowFJ wrote:Could not help but chuckle at this post, and at the state of society. Here is the picture from the FRONT PAGE of the National paper here. Pic is about 12" x 12", and front and center of every store.

I wish the AvCanada moderators could have spared me from this one.
http://www.fijitimes.com/images/artpics/45306thumbm.jpg

http://www.fijitimes.com/

Would someone ban this guy. Showing yummy boobies is one thing but to post this is just wrong

quicksilver · Post by **quicksilver** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:51 pm

The difference between the 2 pics is one is plain old natural nudity

My avatar had no nudity. Just some side boob, and you could see more of that on TV at any given time. Those old saggy ta ta's were way worse.

quick

Flybabe · Post by **Flybabe** » Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:33 am

LOL quick. This is a private board and the users opinions evidently differ from yours. Ergo, it was obviously deemed that your avatar - and others, I noticed - were not considered appropriate.

If you want to look at sweet young thangs in various poses and quantities of clothing, might I suggest you visit a site such as sexy-photos.net or something. I'm sure you can find a site that you can add to your favorites list

There ARE users here that don't visit to see beautiful bouncing babes (yes, I know, it's a shock..

), we come here for things that are related to aviation. Please kindly spare us the jiggling?:smt026

You're fighting a losing battle, me thinks...

My sexy avatar...

My sexy avatar...

Re: My sexy avatar...