Best Bear gun?

This forum has been developed to discuss Bush Flying & Specialty Air Service topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore, Rudder Bug

Post Reply
Northern Skies
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 2:00 pm

Post by Northern Skies »

Apollo wrote:
Image
come to think of it....... I think I met her in a bar in the Sault.....
---------- ADS -----------
 
tazin river
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 7:24 pm
Location: Way up north

Post by tazin river »

I like my good ol' 30-30. Small and fits well in the back of my Citabria...

Tazin
---------- ADS -----------
 
Northern Skies
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 2:00 pm

Post by Northern Skies »

since this topic will be around forever, I guess I'll make a serious post.

Right now I use a 12ga. chinese copy of a rem 870. It cost me $300. The finish and stock isn't as nice, but underneath it's the same gun (probably comes from the same factory). It has a rifled barrel with sights and a smoothbore with choke tubes. Both have 3" chambers. So if I want a bear gun to haul around the bush, I can put the smoothbore on it and carry rifled slugs and buckshot. If I want a bird gun, I throw a tighter choke tube in. During deer season, just throw the rifled barrel on and load up on sabots for a decent brush gun. It's a pretty versatile combo with good stopping power and the price is certainly right.

For it's size, portability, and handling, I've been looking at the winchester 94 trapper. It's a six-shot lever action with a 16" barrel, in .30-30. It would do away with having to haul that shotgun (and heavy ammo) around when I don't want to.

So that's all great for northern Ontario, but if I ever find myself in polar bear territory (or some spots on the west coast), I'm going to want something that is simple, tough, reliable, and does serious business. The shotgun does the job, but being adequately armed isn't as nice as something that will put a polar bear on its ass. I shoot left, so that pretty much narrows it down to a Remington 700KS Safari. I'd pick either the .375 H&H or .458 win. mag. because of their widespread availability. A 500 grain solid from that will keep a decent trajectory and hit with more than two tons of energy. It will punch through tough skin, thick layers of fat, and loads of solid bone with tons of energy to spare. After all, those cartridges were designed for elephants. The rifle weighs 9 pounds and doesn't have any fancy features. It's expensive at around $1600US, but would probably last forever. The ammo isn't cheap at around $5 a round, but that's the same price as a 12ga. sabot anyway. This is not something to take to the range on a sunday afternoon, unless you want an empty wallet and a broken body from the 70 ft-lbs of recoil.

So there you have it. That's my two cents.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2964
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Post by rigpiggy »

Marlin 1895 Stainless Guide Gun in 45/70 loaded with corbon 405 FP Penetrators at 1850 FPS, about 71/2 lbs, short 18.5 bbl, or a pump shotgun w/ slugs either has sufficient energy for short range encounters.. Fast followup shots if necessary..
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Post by Doc »

Ah, rigpiggy, your 45/70 would just pass through...way too much muzzle speed, methinks. You want something that'll open up! Like the 12G slugs!
---------- ADS -----------
 
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2964
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Post by rigpiggy »

Winchester supreme is a 385gr/1900 fps the super X is one oz at 1550 fps. either would be devastatingly effective. As for the 45/70 read vince lupo's account of the big 5 in africa, if it'll kill a cape buffalo it'll work on a bear. earlier in the thread, I mentioned using a pump w/a folding stock to reduce length for a/c stowage.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Post by Doc »

I love that Marlin in 45/70! Used to have a Ruger No1 in .458 mag...was almost afraid to fire..um, er...launch it! Cant beleive this thread is still around..LOL
---------- ADS -----------
 
onceacop
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 3:50 pm
Location: Minnesota USA

Post by onceacop »

Garrett Cartridges is a family-run business specializing in custom-quality 44 Magnum and 45-70 ammunition for those in pursuit of large and dangerous game. We have chosen to offer ammo only in these two calibers, quite simply because these are our two favorite calibers. This reflects a three-decade love affair with the 44 Magnum and 45-70, and a compelling interest in producing the best ammo possible regardless of production inefficiencies or costs. We hand-cast all of our bullets from custom Hensley & Gibbs blocks possessing cavities of our own design, using a special high-performance alloy with exceptional impact integrity. We are the only builders in the industry to take such an approach. As a consequence, our production is limited and the costs of our offerings are considerable. However it is our view that when a hunter is in pursuit of a trophy or determined to defend himself from dangerous game, only the finest ammo should be deployed. Given the substantial costs common to hunting trips, and the obvious value of human life, we believe that any attempt to economize at such critical times is simply ill advised. Consequently we leave it to others to build budget ammo.

> Our ammunition is used by experienced hunters to take all the major species hunted on the planet. It is also widely used by professional hunters and government agencies, such as the National Marine Fisheries Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Grizzly Bear Team of the State of Wyoming, for the protection of field personnel.

Our 310-grain 44 Magnum Hammerhead Ammo is the most powerful SAAMI pressure-compliant ammo available and provides penetration comparable to that achieved with the 375 Holland & Holland using solid bullets. Our 330-grain Hammerhead Ammo is the most powerful 44 Magnum ammo in existence, and rivals the 454 Casull for impact-effect while producing far less chamber pressure.

Our 45-70 Hammerhead Ammo has been used to take all the heaviest game in North America and Africa, including the African Big Six. It also provides greater penetration, in the case of our 540-grain Hammerhead Ammo and 500-grain Exiter Ammo, than is achieved using roundnose solids from the more powerful 458 Magnums. Our 420-grain Hammerhead Ammo provides brutal performance on all thin-skinned game up to about 1400 pounds, out to about 220-yds.

We hope you will take the time to peruse our website as it contains a wealth of explanatory commentary from us as well as many compelling reports from various industry notables and experienced hunters. Our products do exactly what we say they do, and we willingly put our reputations on the line with regards to their performance. Our ammunition quite simply defines us, and redefines our two favorite calibers.

Randy M. Garrett, President
---------- ADS -----------
 
Athabascan Quote: "Know one knows the ways of the wind or the Caribou".
RatherBeFlying
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Toronto

Post by RatherBeFlying »

The likelihood of getting killed or chewed up by a bear or cougar is a whole bunch lower than that of stopping a stray slug in Toronto. The statistical hazard fades further as we add in the chances of getting hit by a drunk driver, or soccer mom or corporate warrior driving SUV while on a cell phone -- in fact a near daily hazard.

Oh yes, last I heard, pilots kill themselves with far greater frequency than bears manage.

On a more personal note, I've had a few face to face encounters with blacks and grizzlies. The wilderness bear generally prefers to avoid trouble. Bears used to people are a whole different story. Keep your camps clean so you don't get one of those hanging about.

The rangers use flash-bangs to scare off bears. A common use is to drive a bear away from a carcass that is too close to a trail for people to walk by without the bear getting concerned. Less skill required, less money and less weight compared to dragging about some of the fine ordinance discussed previously.
---------- ADS -----------
 
neechi
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 6:04 pm

Post by neechi »

I agree with Mr. Stephen Colbert. Bears are "Godless killing machines" :wink: Can"t be trusted. See one. Shoot one!
---------- ADS -----------
 
lilfssister
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 2783
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 2:51 pm
Location: Mysteryville Castle

Post by lilfssister »

Doc, you wanted it back?
---------- ADS -----------
 
grimey
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2979
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:01 am
Location: somewhere drunk

Post by grimey »

Doc wrote:There should be.....it'd save more little lives than safe gun storage ever will! But it wont cause the media frenzzy that a good old "Little Billy guns down his best friend with daddy's hunting rifle!" That's NEWS! Chocking to death on improperly stored, scented tampons is not!
http://timlambert.org/2001/07/levittpoolsvsguns/
What’s more dangerous: a swimming pool or a gun? When it comes to children, there is no comparison: a swimming pool is 100 times more deadly.

In 1997 alone (the last year for which data are available), 742 children under the age of 10 drowned in the United States last year alone. Approximately 550 of those drownings — about 75 percent of the total — occurred in residential swimming pools. According to the most recent statistics, there are about six million residential pools, meaning that one young child drowns annually for every 11,000 pools.

About 175 children under the age of 10 died in 1998 as a result of guns. About two-thirds of those deaths were homicides. There are an estimated 200 million guns in the United States. Doing the math, there is roughly one child killed by guns for every one million guns.

Thus, on average, if you both own a gun and have a swimming pool in the backyard, the swimming pool is about 100 times more likely to kill a child than the gun is.
---------- ADS -----------
 
wiz
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 5:45 am
Location: The wonderful land of Auz

Post by wiz »

45/70 in a handcrank saddle gun. nice and short, not to heavy. might be slighly under powered, but the weight of the projectiles will slow him up some. :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
w squared
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2040
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Somewhere in the patch

Post by w squared »

This is the thread that just won't die....

I've done some more reading and research since my last serious post to this thread. A 45-70 lever action (a Marlin 1895 in stainless for my $$) firing the Garret 540 grain would stop just about anything. Pair that up with a set of the XS sights "ghost ring" sights and you're set. You even have the option of a weaver or picatinny rail as part of the mix so that you can switch to a scope with a lighter (as if 350 grains was actually light), faster round to get a flatter trajectory for longer ranged work on stuff like deer.

Until you posted about them, onceacop, I didn't know about the Garret cartridges...some very interesting reading on their site. Not exactly a slick site, but I'd be confident spending my money on their ammo.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image

Please don't tell my mother that I work in the Oilpatch...she still thinks that I'm the piano player at a whorehouse.
User avatar
swede
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 976
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:47 am
Location: punksatahawnee

Post by swede »

The . Norris fist of steel will take care of the biggest baddest ass bear on the continent, observe the devastating effect of a mere flick against the 110# ho, no bear alive could absorb the full fury of a crashing, crushing round house, and survive -

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
North of You
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: On the Grassy Knoll, Fat Dumb and Happy

Post by North of You »

On a side note… any of you still taking advantage of the hand exemption for pilots up north? Had mine to the point of getting approved and then I left the bush and wasn’t eligible anymore. I just thought it would have made one h#@% of a tax deduction!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Post by Doc »

That single action Ruger .22 that you have with you, is way better than the .458 magnum you left back in the lodge!
---------- ADS -----------
 
w squared
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2040
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Somewhere in the patch

Post by w squared »

Especially since you can shoot your buddy in the kneecap with the .22, and then you'll be able to outrun him.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image

Please don't tell my mother that I work in the Oilpatch...she still thinks that I'm the piano player at a whorehouse.
Jim N
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:55 pm
Location: Behind the crosshairs

Post by Jim N »

Image

Its like an American Express card that shoots slugs, I don't leave home without it.

The Remmy factory folder and a 15 3/4" barrel is just over 660mm making this about as short/compact as one can go and remain non-restricted...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Jim N on Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
w squared
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2040
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Somewhere in the patch

Post by w squared »

Bump. The bear gun thread should never die.

I'd probably look for the stainless model if possible. If you're going to carry it everywhere, low maintenance is good.

Low maintenance is also good when it comes to girlfriends (or boyfriends, if that's what turns yer crank)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image

Please don't tell my mother that I work in the Oilpatch...she still thinks that I'm the piano player at a whorehouse.
buck82
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 7:29 pm

Post by buck82 »

Next question...

do y'all keep your bear guns loaded; so your at least ready when the event occurs?
---------- ADS -----------
 
w squared
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2040
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Somewhere in the patch

Post by w squared »

My $0.02 CDN on loaded weapons.

If it's in my hands, or in a secure holster which completely protects the trigger guard, I don't have a problem with having a round chambered with either the safety engaged or the hammer down (on a double action revolver that has a transfer bar type safety feature).

If it's in a pack, or on a sling, or tucked into a waistband, or in a gun rack, I would not have a round in the chamber. The gun may well be loaded with rounds in the internal magazine, but having a round chambered when you do not have control over what happens to the trigger does not strike me as a good idea.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image

Please don't tell my mother that I work in the Oilpatch...she still thinks that I'm the piano player at a whorehouse.
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Post by Doc »

For me, "safe carry" involves.
Single action "six-shooter" revolver, five rounds, with the hammer on an empty chamber.
Double action "modern" revolver, all six can be loaded...but I still go with five, and the hammer on an empty.
Lever gun (my fav...BTW) empty chamber.
Pump guy...same.
Bolt action....n/a...too slow.
Auto loader, pistol or long gun, empty chamber.
---------- ADS -----------
 
buck82
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 7:29 pm

Post by buck82 »

Yeah,

It always seemed to me an unloaded firearm was nothing more than a really expensive stick, or pipe for that matter. (As if your going to have time to run back to the plane, fumble around, find bullets, load, unlock your trigger guard and then fire)
---------- ADS -----------
 
w squared
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2040
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 2:32 pm
Location: Somewhere in the patch

Post by w squared »

We're saying pretty much the same thing, Doc.

I guess the difference for me is that the years spent wearing green and humping around selective-fire rifles with a round in the chamber convinced me that a trained and alert mind is the best way to ensure safety when the weapon is in your hands.

That said, if somebody isn't comfortable with a round in the chamber, then there shouldn't be a round in the chamber.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image

Please don't tell my mother that I work in the Oilpatch...she still thinks that I'm the piano player at a whorehouse.
Post Reply

Return to “Bush Flying & Specialty Air Service”