Pilots, if it's not safe, don't take it! (Clearences)
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore
- invertedattitude
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:12 pm
Pilots, if it's not safe, don't take it! (Clearences)
Heard of a story happened today of a "Large", relatively speaking, jet be issued an instruction to land and exit at taxiway such and such.
This taxiway is about halfway down a short runway, there was another jet, slightly smaller on approach tight behind. The pilot accepted the instruction, and railed on the brakes but still overshot the taxiway by 1500' had to back-track and then complained that "That was too close" in reference to the other jet.
Furthermore, there was possibly damage done during heavy braking because there was steering issues later on departure which had to be serviced.
Long story short, if an ATC instruction is not safe, or is out of your comfort zone, don't take it! There's almost always other options.
This taxiway is about halfway down a short runway, there was another jet, slightly smaller on approach tight behind. The pilot accepted the instruction, and railed on the brakes but still overshot the taxiway by 1500' had to back-track and then complained that "That was too close" in reference to the other jet.
Furthermore, there was possibly damage done during heavy braking because there was steering issues later on departure which had to be serviced.
Long story short, if an ATC instruction is not safe, or is out of your comfort zone, don't take it! There's almost always other options.
- invertedattitude
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:12 pm
I was taught that during my training quite a few times... but I can understand ATC pressure on a pilots decisions.XJET wrote:Must have been a jazz aircraft and a seneca student....
Most of us still have some common sense in us.
Thanks for posting, but I thought instructors who aren't to busy building hours were supposed to teach this sort of thing to students?
Actually, you're right, we've been taught to say "no." No to bad clearances, wx, unsafe aircraft....invertedattitude wrote: I was taught that during my training quite a few times... but I can understand ATC pressure on a pilots decisions.
This should just be stickied and put in the general forum, because we have guys out there who will say yes to anything, icing, tornadoes, overloading, multi missing an engine, atc directives.
And since it was "larger" jet, shouldn't it be 2 crew, where was the crew resource management, why didn't the f/o(or the capt) tell the guy landing and accepting the clearance to "re-think" the idea. I'm pretty sure both butts are going to be spanked, and if it turned out worse, both butts would be out on the street.
- invertedattitude
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:12 pm
Okay, I think the "jist" of what I posted was.....I've seen controllers give "instructions" to pilots that some will blindly follow. To some pilots, the controller's words are THE LAW. I did refer to the pilots who baked their brakes trying to do something they couldn't as "morons"...I may have insulted some controllers...who we all know are really BAD...except Jerricho, who, of course is the best controller in de whole world!!!
Cheers Mate!
Cheers Mate!
-
wordstwice
- Rank 4

- Posts: 270
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 2:48 pm
- Location: pointy end
!
Last edited by wordstwice on Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.









