INRAT written

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

xpiredIFRchick
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 6:32 am

INRAT written

Post by xpiredIFRchick »

hi everyone,

My IFR has expired, over 5 years and I have to redo the written in Hamilton or Toronto. Can anyone help me get through this, ie: has anyone recently written it, questions. I have the AeroCourse IFR book, but man alot of question, LOL.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks :(
---------- ADS -----------
 
TopperHarley
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1870
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:56 pm

Post by TopperHarley »

expiredchick,

DO the aerocourse book!! Lots of questions, but it will prepare you. If you can do well on those exercises, you will have no problem with the real one.

As far as suggestions, read the COM section in the AIP with regards to GPS information. I had a lot of GPS questions on mine, including several GPS approaches. Do NOT study the GPS info from the IPM, as it is not updated.

Good luck.
---------- ADS -----------
 
‎"Never travel faster than your guardian angel can fly." - Mother Theresa
User avatar
Snowgoose
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1835
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Duty Free Shop

Post by Snowgoose »

Go through the aerocourse book front to back and once that's done write the exam the next day.

Other than the GUMP check that was the best advice I was given in aviation
---------- ADS -----------
 
It's better to break ground and head into the wind than to break wind and head into the ground.
User avatar
LT
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 676
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by LT »

C-HRIS wrote:expiredchick,

DO the aerocourse book!! Lots of questions, but it will prepare you. If you can do well on those exercises, you will have no problem with the real one.

had a lot of GPS questions on mine, including several GPS approaches. Do NOT study the GPS info from the IPM, as it is not updated.
To bad aerocourse doesn't have more info on GPS in the course and/or the workbook.

If you did your CPL already and passed w/ an 80.. The INRAT will be a joke..
---------- ADS -----------
 
xpiredIFRchick
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 6:32 am

INRAT

Post by xpiredIFRchick »

i did my commerical and INRAT years ago...should i basically study the questions and answers in the aerocourse book then...are they very close to the real ones?
thanks
---------- ADS -----------
 
Crispy3M
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 2:33 pm

IFR Prep

Post by Crispy3M »

RAC 6.0 - 10.0
CapGen from Cover to Cover
Aero Course Practical (Both Sections)
Met

You will be good to go!

Good luck!

Crispy
---------- ADS -----------
 
xpiredIFRchick
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 6:32 am

INRAT

Post by xpiredIFRchick »

thanks guys, i baught the book yesterday and kind of went through it today, with about 80% success on it..has anyone gone very recently or known of anyone.

:lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
TopperHarley
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1870
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:56 pm

Post by TopperHarley »

xpired,

I did mine back in december. The only problem with the aerocourse book is the lack of GPS questions. Apart from that, it is very representative of the real exam.

As was mentionned above, know the AIP (not just RAC 6-10, but read over AGA, COM, MET, AIR) and know the CAP-GEN very well. I got a few questions that came out of the AIP that were obscure (ex. when are you not required to read back a takeoff clearance... what is the width of a glideslope/localizer beam, etc).
---------- ADS -----------
 
‎"Never travel faster than your guardian angel can fly." - Mother Theresa
Tango01
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: ON

Post by Tango01 »

C-HRIS wrote:xpired,

I did mine back in december. The only problem with the aerocourse book is the lack of GPS questions. Apart from that, it is very representative of the real exam.

As was mentionned above, know the AIP (not just RAC 6-10, but read over AGA, COM, MET, AIR) and know the CAP-GEN very well. I got a few questions that came out of the AIP that were obscure (ex. when are you not required to read back a takeoff clearance... what is the width of a glideslope/localizer beam, etc).
So C-HRIS, when are you not required to read back a T/O clearance?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Timing is everything.
Quagmire
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 1:48 pm
Location: North O' Montreal.

Post by Quagmire »

Iwrote my inrat in june it was more difficult than the cpl. The biggest surprise where the amount of gps questions.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Hey there's a plane! And where there's a plane, there's a pilot. And where there's a pilot there's a bar!"
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Post by Cat Driver »

WARNING..

If you do not know the "exact" width of the ILS glidescope/localizer beam you will never be able to do an ILS approach.

Never take it for granted that any of these questions have no importance.

We sometimes become complacent and start to think that a lot of these TC questions are not important knowledge to have, but they were thought up by the very best that aviation has to offer, so remember you need to know the correct answer or you will never be able to fly IFR.

Cat
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
User avatar
Right Seat Captain
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 1237
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Various/based CYOW

Post by Right Seat Captain »

Cat, don't you know those questions are just to make sure nobody gets 100%. That way the statistics remain in their favour.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Post by Cat Driver »

R.S.C. :

I do know that TC has a mandate to have a 27% failure rate, I got that right from the top guy in Flight Training in Ottawa when I owned a flight school.

Cat
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
TopperHarley
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1870
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:56 pm

Post by TopperHarley »

Tango1,

According to RAC 6.0 of the AIP, you do not need to readback your t/o clearance if:
- you receive the clearance on the ground prior to takeoff.
- you are departing a controlled airport.
- there is a SID included in the clearance.

In this case, all that is required is for you to say your call sign/flight number and your sqwuak code.
---------- ADS -----------
 
‎"Never travel faster than your guardian angel can fly." - Mother Theresa
Isabella
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: BC

Post by Isabella »

I'm about to write my INRAT as well.... Everyone keeps telling me to know GPS really well... but someone just mentioned that the IPM is out of date. Is there a good book that any of you would suggest reading or should I just study the AIP?
---------- ADS -----------
 
TopperHarley
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1870
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:56 pm

Post by TopperHarley »

Isabella,

All you need to know in regards to GPS can be found in the AIP. Read COM 3.16 to 3.169. Also, read AIC 7/04. Finally, know the flight planning rules and regs that apply to GPS alternates (RAC 3.0).

Do NOT use the IPM. I did, and I got many wrong.

Good luck.
---------- ADS -----------
 
‎"Never travel faster than your guardian angel can fly." - Mother Theresa
ahramin
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 6324
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver

Post by ahramin »

Uh could someone fill me in here? I used the instrument procedures manual when i got my instrument rating. I still use the same procedures. As far as i know there has not been a revolution in instrument flying techniques. Maybe i just missed out?

What has changed so much?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tango01
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: ON

Post by Tango01 »

C-HRIS wrote:Tango1,

According to RAC 6.0 of the AIP, you do not need to readback your t/o clearance if:
- you receive the clearance on the ground prior to takeoff.
- you are departing a controlled airport.
- there is a SID included in the clearance.

In this case, all that is required is for you to say your call sign/flight number and your sqwuak code.

The way I interpreted that part is an IFR clearance need not be read back. One thing is to copy and read back a clearance, and another is to ignore the TWR when they clear you for t/o. I though the question stated "when are you not required to read back your t/o clearance"

Is it the same thing?

T01
[/b]
---------- ADS -----------
 
Timing is everything.
LB
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 12:33 pm

Post by LB »

My INRAT expired as well, just wondering if my old Aerocourse is still o.k to use I had it for 5-6 years, but then again if you say it hasn't changed much from then except for the GPS, then it should still be good. Guess I answered my own question!
---------- ADS -----------
 
dxpr
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 3:03 pm

Post by dxpr »

Question on this thread...

My instrument rating was years ago... I need to write the INRAT again. After I write the INRAT, do I really need to do a renewal at the flight school, or will the instrument renewal / PPC cover it?

Seems to me that I should be ok, and I should not hand J Mo any more of my money than I need to.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Don't drink the Kool Aid!
TopperHarley
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1870
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:56 pm

Post by TopperHarley »

Tango1,

You do not need to readback the full clearance, but you must still acknowledge the tower. This can be done by saying your call sign/flight number and your sqwuak code, as opposed to saying everything they said to you.

In regards to my comments about the IPM... I implied that you should no refer to it for the GPS questions. The IPM is good for everything else; althogh, some stuff is out of date, especially the GPS stuff. You MUST use the AIP along with the IPM.

As far as aerocourse goes... I used it, and I really liked it. It helped a lot, especially with the met and planning sections. Again, the only thing lacking is there is not much on GPS. Just read the sections in the AIP, and you should be okay. Also, review some GPS approaches in a CAP.

A PPC should count for the renewal of the IFR; at least, that is what I have been told.

Good luck to everyone writing the INRAT,

Chris.
---------- ADS -----------
 
‎"Never travel faster than your guardian angel can fly." - Mother Theresa
3Green
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:36 pm
Location: Ontariariari-O

Post by 3Green »

CHRIS, I think you're getting lost in your own misunderstanding with regards to the "Take-off Clearance".
You are not required to read back all of your "IFR Clearance" that you receive from Clearance Delivery/Ground/Tower/Flight Service/Centre (whoever you're speaking to at this time). This is the clearance you call for before taxi or take off. If a "Full Readback is required" you will be informed by the person providing you with that clearance. If not, then you need only to readback the squawk code and SID, etc.
What you seem to be confusing this "IFR Clearance" with is the "Take-Off Clearance" given by a tower while you're at the hold short line, ready for take off. If you do not read this one back, the tower will hound you to read it back and make you look like a jackass until you do.
Tango was just being a smartass because you were being a dumbass on this one. :lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by 3Green on Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
TopperHarley
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1870
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:56 pm

Post by TopperHarley »

3green,

I apologize for the misunderstanding. I realize it is not the takeoff clearance, but the IFR one that this applies to.

For clarification, see RAC 6.1, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence.

Chris.
---------- ADS -----------
 
‎"Never travel faster than your guardian angel can fly." - Mother Theresa
Guilden
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 3:12 pm

IFR written

Post by Guilden »

Hey peeps, im taking the Comm pilot course at SIAST in saskatoon its a very intense GS on IFR..were referring to the IPM a lot. Should we be? How much of that exam is GPS, cause we have not covered anything on GPS yet.....
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
BuddyJay
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: Where the lobsters grow

Post by BuddyJay »

Guilden, I would suggest reading the AIP, COM section. 3.16 and AIC 7/04. The AIC is a summarization of section 3.16 but there was material from the COM 3.16 on the exam that wasn't found in the AIC circular.
Overall I would say get yourself pretty familiar with the GPS material because the exam has to test people who would use GPS in the IFR world.
Plus I've heard this from a few other people also... also as mentioned above the RAC section...
ADF tracking questions, cold corrections, lots of minima stuff....

Hope that helps..

BJ
---------- ADS -----------
 
To mind one's view is to view only one's mind.
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”