Government Airline?

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Redwine
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:20 pm
Location: FLINE@9

Government Airline?

Post by Redwine »

---------- ADS -----------
 
...Seems they are going to remove the axe and the control column from the cockpits for security reasons.
ywger
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:28 am

Post by ywger »

.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by ywger on Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
YYCcrew
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by YYCcrew »

hhhmmmm, perhaps Westjet will be approached to operate this route... could be interesting ;-)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Swerved
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Why Cue Tee, Waiwai Zee?

Post by Swerved »

Hell, give it to WJ. See if they're stupid enough to operate the route for as long as AC was pressured into doing. The three people I know who have flown this route have yet to see more than 40 passengers on any flight. For crying out loud, the f**king Newfies complain about everything, and this new Transport Minister doesn't look much better. The company has to look at the bottom line, and act accordingly...give me a frickin' break. Maybe it's time to shut down Newfoundland, and send them ALL to Fort McMurray. ;)

Swerved.
---------- ADS -----------
 
In a world full of people, only some want to fly. Isn't that crazy?
wooden spoon
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 7:22 pm

Post by wooden spoon »

swerved your an idiot.much of the problem with this flight is the slot time in LHR at 2135.There are no connections anywhere else that night,forcing pax to go out of yyt earlier to yhz or yyz ot yul.Factor in these pax and have a look.I personally have been on this flight a couple of times and it was full or near it.And i have asked psr in yyt and they say the loads were ok mostly....

ws
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dockjock
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:46 pm
Location: south saturn delta

Post by Dockjock »

Suggested subtitle to this article "Seasonal Summer Service to End Sept. 4"

SHOCKER!!!
Newfie politicians are such morons and they all want champagne service on a beer budget.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Swerved
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Why Cue Tee, Waiwai Zee?

Post by Swerved »

Wooden Spoon, first of all, please understand that much of my post was made a little tongue in cheek. Secondly, I'm glad to hear that maybe this route wasn't a completely lost cause... Based on the (admittedly little) information I had, the route didn't look like much of a winner. Seems there was a fair amount of talk amongst crews that would seem to back that up. Fact is, obviously, crews only ever get a snapshot, whereas the agents in YYT would clearly have a better idea.

I'm just so tired of everyone jumping on big bad AC every time they make a business decision. The company is free to do whatever they want with their routes (within the letter of the law), and if they could make money flying YYT-LHR, I'm sure they would continue doing so.

Have a good weekend...

Swerved.
---------- ADS -----------
 
In a world full of people, only some want to fly. Isn't that crazy?
Traf
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:40 pm

Post by Traf »

I don't get it. AC promised to provide summer service only. Guess what, summer is drawing to an end. If the gov't wants to run AC fine. Let them put some money into the bottom line. Otherwise STFU and let them do business like everyone else in the country.
---------- ADS -----------
 
sanjet
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:54 am

Post by sanjet »

LOL:

The Newfoundland and Labrador government says Air Canada has cancelled direct flights to London, England, from St. John's despite a promise to provide a seasonal summer service.

Considering FALL season starts end of September... :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
ccbor
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Canada

Greetings from Newfoundland

Post by ccbor »

Swerved wrote:Hell, give it to WJ. See if they're stupid enough to operate the route for as long as AC was pressured into doing. The three people I know who have flown this route have yet to see more than 40 passengers on any flight. For crying out loud, the f**king Newfies complain about everything, and this new Transport Minister doesn't look much better. The company has to look at the bottom line, and act accordingly...give me a frickin' break. Maybe it's time to shut down Newfoundland, and send them ALL to Fort McMurray. ;)

Swerved.
Well Swerved, as I read after this post you said your comments were tongue in Cheek. Let me vector you by telling you between what cheeks you can place your F***ing tongue. Between every Newfoundlander and Labradorians Ass in this country, no matter if they are on the rock or out in "Fort McMurray" you pompous @$$. This burns me up! I come on this site to read about how to help and how to get help furthering our carriers and I find posts like this one which are beyond Fu**ing bigotry. "Shut down Newfoundland"??... My God man, talk sense!!!

Politics aside, I know damn well know why they want routes over to England. It's because now we must turn west departing here. Either to fly to Halifax or to Toronto to get overseas. Hell.. your three wise men whom you call friends and and hundreds of thousands of us, as you politely call us, "Newfies" and I know that it costs a lot of money to send a Aircraft with just "40 seats occupied" across the pond and that won't make money even if the plane was made of paper and helium. The point is in the traveling publics eyes this as taking 2 steps backward to go 3 steps ahead. Not every "Newfie" thinks like the politician and I hope the rest of the world don't think like you.


Thank you
---------- ADS -----------
 
What does it mean to pre-board? Do you get on before you get on?
maxofthenorth
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:03 pm

Post by maxofthenorth »

I was on it last week LHR-YYT and there were only about 40 people on the flight.... including all the non revs!
---------- ADS -----------
 
wooden spoon
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 7:22 pm

Post by wooden spoon »

The slot time here is the issue and the fact that you would have to fill the aircraft with revenue pax.who want the final Dest to be London.Slots in to Hethrow are worth(just Guessing)Millions(see Airlingus vacating snn-lhr for bel-lhr and taking the slots with them)So AC has a slot..so where do you use it?You certainly do not want to give it up(the slot) it stunts future growth.
(use where you can)...

ws.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Jaques Strappe
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1847
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 6:34 pm
Location: YYZ

Re: Greetings from Newfoundland

Post by Jaques Strappe »

ccbor wrote:
Swerved wrote:Hell, give it to WJ. See if they're stupid enough to operate the route for as long as AC was pressured into doing. The three people I know who have flown this route have yet to see more than 40 passengers on any flight. For crying out loud, the f**king Newfies complain about everything, and this new Transport Minister doesn't look much better. The company has to look at the bottom line, and act accordingly...give me a frickin' break. Maybe it's time to shut down Newfoundland, and send them ALL to Fort McMurray. ;)

Swerved.
Well Swerved, as I read after this post you said your comments were tongue in Cheek. Let me vector you by telling you between what cheeks you can place your F***ing tongue. Between every Newfoundlander and Labradorians Ass in this country, no matter if they are on the rock or out in "Fort McMurray" you pompous @$$. This burns me up! I come on this site to read about how to help and how to get help furthering our carriers and I find posts like this one which are beyond Fu**ing bigotry. "Shut down Newfoundland"??... My God man, talk sense!!!

Politics aside, I know damn well know why they want routes over to England. It's because now we must turn west departing here. Either to fly to Halifax or to Toronto to get overseas. Hell.. your three wise men whom you call friends and and hundreds of thousands of us, as you politely call us, "Newfies" and I know that it costs a lot of money to send a Aircraft with just "40 seats occupied" across the pond and that won't make money even if the plane was made of paper and helium. The point is in the traveling publics eyes this as taking 2 steps backward to go 3 steps ahead. Not every "Newfie" thinks like the politician and I hope the rest of the world don't think like you.


Thank you

So based on your explanation, I guess Air Canada should start a non-stop Goose Bay - London flight so all the people from labrador won't have to fly South before heading East? Of course, it would only be a "Summer Service" that would be operated 12 months of the year. Not to mention, Air Canada is only a "private" company when the Government says so.

:lol:

I think you may need to grow a thicker skin if you were offended by an obvious sarcasm.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Standby for new atis message
Swerved
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Why Cue Tee, Waiwai Zee?

Post by Swerved »

ccbor, come on... This is the last post I'm going to make on this topic. If you don't appreciate the sarcasm with which I made my first post, I'm terribly sorry. As for coming to this site to further your career, before you decide to roast me, I suggest you spend some time reading some of my posts over the past few years. I've spent plenty of time writing posts trying to help inform people about everything from 703 to 705 flying (based on both personal and friends' experience), to the point where my wife rolls her eyes every time I log on to the site. Not to mention the hundreds of hours (of my own time) I spent while at my last company sifting through resumes, and helping get people the break they were looking for in the industry.

My rant comes from being tired of hearing complaints (by both provincial an federal politicians) over any decisions AC has made regarding the YYT-LHR route over the past number of years. Quite frankly, it's a little tiring. You don't think I know what it's like to backtrack? I live in Thunder Bay, and my family is in Vancouver. 90% of the time I want to go between the two cities, I have to go through Toronto. Generally it takes about five hours (including the connection in YYZ) to get back over Thunder Bay on my way West. IT SUCKS!! Having said that, it's what the market dictates, so I deal with it. I hope Danny Williams keeps fighting the good fight against the Feds about their offshore oil revenue...thank God the good Newfoundlanders (sorry about the "slur"...I promise never to call anyone a Newfie again) are fighting over what is rightfully theirs. What is NOT rightfully theirs is a year-round route flying directly to London. Not unless it becomes profitable, or the Feds take back Air Canada.

Thanks, and have a good Labour Day.

Swerved.
---------- ADS -----------
 
In a world full of people, only some want to fly. Isn't that crazy?
aroundthewing
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:57 pm

Re: Greetings from Newfoundland

Post by aroundthewing »

Jaques Strappe wrote:
Not to mention, Air Canada is only a "private" company when the Government says so.
You hit the nail right on the head with that one!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by aroundthewing on Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ccbor
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Canada

Post by ccbor »

removed
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by ccbor on Sun Sep 02, 2007 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What does it mean to pre-board? Do you get on before you get on?
aroundthewing
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:57 pm

Re: Greetings from Newfoundland

Post by aroundthewing »

Jaques Strappe wrote:
Not to mention, Air Canada is only a "private" company when the Government says so.
Well, you hit the nail right on the head with that one!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
ccbor
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Canada

Post by ccbor »

Swerved wrote:ccbor, come on... This is the last post I'm going to make on this topic. If you don't appreciate the sarcasm with which I made my first post, I'm terribly sorry. As for coming to this site to further your career, before you decide to roast me, I suggest you spend some time reading some of my posts over the past few years. I've spent plenty of time writing posts trying to help inform people about everything from 703 to 705 flying (based on both personal and friends' experience), to the point where my wife rolls her eyes every time I log on to the site. Not to mention the hundreds of hours (of my own time) I spent while at my last company sifting through resumes, and helping get people the break they were looking for in the industry.

My rant comes from being tired of hearing complaints (by both provincial an federal politicians) over any decisions AC has made regarding the YYT-LHR route over the past number of years. Quite frankly, it's a little tiring. You don't think I know what it's like to backtrack? I live in Thunder Bay, and my family is in Vancouver. 90% of the time I want to go between the two cities, I have to go through Toronto. Generally it takes about five hours (including the connection in YYZ) to get back over Thunder Bay on my way West. IT SUCKS!! Having said that, it's what the market dictates, so I deal with it. I hope Danny Williams keeps fighting the good fight against the Feds about their offshore oil revenue...thank God the good Newfoundlanders (sorry about the "slur"...I promise never to call anyone a Newfie again) are fighting over what is rightfully theirs. What is NOT rightfully theirs is a year-round route flying directly to London. Not unless it becomes profitable, or the Feds take back Air Canada.

Thanks, and have a good Labour Day.

Swerved.

Swerved,

Thank you for your kind words sir, what I read now from you is that you are a fine gentleman. In my defense looks like I wrote a letter to JS while you already responded to mine. I've since removed it. Let's leave this discussion behind us and move forward.

Sincerely
Bor
---------- ADS -----------
 
What does it mean to pre-board? Do you get on before you get on?
WF9F
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:21 am

Post by WF9F »

The 767 that did the YYT-LHR should never have been pulled in the first place. It normally went out full and made good money on the cargo out off YYT.Oh i forgot AC does not think there is any money in cargo.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2783
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Post by yycflyguy »

WF9F wrote:The 767 that did the YYT-LHR should never have been pulled in the first place. It normally went out full and made good money on the cargo out off YYT.Oh i forgot AC does not think there is any money in cargo.
Speaking of money and wet lease cargo flying... where is my check?
---------- ADS -----------
 
TFE731
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 12:47 am

Post by TFE731 »

"In the mail by end of Aug." as quoted from a recent ACPA post. Of course last report before that one said "In the mail by early Aug." :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
interested
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 8:03 am

Post by interested »

http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet ... iness/home

Coincidence? Sounds like there is a lot of money coming from across the pond to help with the provincial economy.....sometimes "seats filled" isn't always the determining factor on what makes a route profitable when there are players with pull involved.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”