Dutch ticket tax - condemned.

Discuss topics relating to airlines.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

Post Reply
TallDutch
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:07 am
Location: Hoofddorp, Netherlands

Dutch ticket tax - condemned.

Post by TallDutch »

The proposal would increase the existing passenger service charge by €11.25 for passengers travelling within the European Union, and flights under 2500 km. It would also increase by €45 for passengers to other destinations, this is considered ineffective and inappropriate - as it breaches international obligations.

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) condemned the Dutch Government’s plans to impose further taxes on air passengers. The government is planning to tax passengers departing the Netherlands by air as much as €45 citing environmental reasons.

“This passenger tax is ineffective, inappropriate and it breaches international obligations. It is a thinly disguised tax grab that does nothing for the environment. If anything, it is counter productive as it limits airlines’ ability to buy newer, more fuel-efficient aircraft,” said Giovanni Bisignani, IATA Director General and CEO.

“Airlines are making great strides to improve their environmental performance. Last year we saved 6 million tonnes of CO2 by shortening 350 routes globally. We have improved fuel efficiency 70% over the past 40 years and forecast a further 25% improvement by 2020. The Dutch Government should be looking at what it can do to help airlines limit emissions.

It can start by working with other EU governments to implement a Single European Sky that would save 12 million tonnes of CO2 each year. It should also look at tax credits as an incentive to improve environmental performance rather than counterproductive taxes,” added Bisignani.

The passenger tax also breaches resolutions of the International Civil Organisation (ICAO) and Article 15 of the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. “I am surprised that the Netherlands, as an ICAO Contracting State, chooses to ignore its obligations and trample over international agreements,” Bisignani commented.

“We are seeing a worrying trend across Europe with governments cynically taxing air passengers for environmental reasons then failing to use the revenues for environmental purposes. These taxes are blunt instruments that just damage tourism and impact the competitiveness of European businesses. We urge the Dutch Government to rethink this ineffective, inappropriate and misguided proposal,” concluded Bisignani.

http://www.4hoteliers.com/4hots_nshw.php?mwi=3621
---------- ADS -----------
 
W5
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1005
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Edmonton,AB

Post by W5 »

I guess that I won't be flying in and out of Schiphol non-stop from North America. Weren't the Brits talking of a similar measure at the London airports?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
pic777
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:40 am
Contact:

Post by pic777 »

Well, good luck transferring @ LHR, CDG, or FFM ;)
It would be nice if our YYZ and YVR flights were a little less full, makes the sby travel a bit less stressfull.
Now if we could stop the government taxing our sby tickets, things would really be looking up!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Airline Industry Comments”