Martin Mars, Going to California

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

User avatar
dhc-t2
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:47 pm

Martin Mars, Going to California

Post by dhc-t2 »

Just heard this on the news this evening. Martin Mars going to California to help out with the disaster going on there. Too bad they didn't go before now.
---------- ADS -----------
 
sky's the limit
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 4614
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:38 am
Location: Now where's the starter button on this thing???

Re: Martin Mars, Going to California

Post by sky's the limit »

dhc-t2 wrote: Too bad they didn't go before now.
That, would be dangerously close to foresight, something Gov't AND aviation have dangerously little of....

Nice to see them in action though,


stl
---------- ADS -----------
 
sissyphus
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 354
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:10 pm

Post by sissyphus »

i was wondering why they weren't there
---------- ADS -----------
 
The mouth is the anus of the mind.
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4770
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Post by co-joe »

Did anyone else catch that footage on TV of the DC 10 dropping it's load on the fire in Kalifornia? Holy shit that's a big load of mud! :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
bigsky
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Alberta

Post by bigsky »

So did it go..??
---------- ADS -----------
 
There is no substitute for BIG JUGS!!
twotter
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1483
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 11:28 am

Post by twotter »

Yup, a buddy of mine was flying side by side with it as it went past Victoria this morning.
---------- ADS -----------
 
wallypilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1646
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: The Best Coast

Post by wallypilot »

Saw it pass right over Vic yesterday.....I have never seen it in flight before....maybe never will again! Right place right time for a perfect view!
---------- ADS -----------
 
sstaurus
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:32 pm

Post by sstaurus »

co-joe wrote:Did anyone else catch that footage on TV of the DC 10 dropping it's load on the fire in Kalifornia? Holy shit that's a big load of mud! :shock:
I've heard the reason (besides the states being among the last to ever ask for help) is that industry there is already so hugely invested in these 'mud bombers' the last thing they ever want is a Canadian water-bomber destroying their mud-bomber industry. Ever see many 415s in the US? They don't want people seeing that a water bomber is infinitely more efficient than a mud bomber which has to return to an aerodrome each time, vs a 415 (or Mars) which can scoop nearby water in minutes. Funny how they never mention that the Mars is coming from Canada in the US news.

However I could be wrong, I was just having a discussion with someone about it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tiny Voices
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 281
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:46 pm

Post by Tiny Voices »

Is the foam injection a 1 time shot per flight in the 215 and 415's, or can you inject foam for every individual drop?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tak
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:06 am

Foam

Post by Tak »

From their web page...

The concentrated foam chemical is carried in the Bombardier 415 in one or two 300-litre (80-gallon) reservoirs. When used, it is injected into the water load at a ratio of 0.3% to 0.6% by volume. Using a 0.4% concentration, wich is typicaly used in firefighting, a 6000-litre (1585-gallon) water load requires only 24 litres (6.4-gallons) of foam concentrate. Foam is inexpensive compared to the cost of dropping an equivalent quantity of long-term retardant (red slush commonly used as a fire barrier).

BTW, just read somewhere that the Martin Mars had a bit of a bird strike on the way down. Looking for further news...

Tak
---------- ADS -----------
 
NWONT
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:20 pm

Post by NWONT »

You inject each load and you can adjust the amount of each injection.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Driving Rain
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: At a Tanker Base near you.
Contact:

Post by Driving Rain »

NWONT wrote:You inject each load and you can adjust the amount of each injection.

That'right Ray.
This is the best part, you can turn it off when needs be, not something you can do with a retardent. We don't want to kill fish do we?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tiny Voices
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 281
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:46 pm

Post by Tiny Voices »

Thanks for the informative replies Tak, NWONT, and Driving Rain :D .
---------- ADS -----------
 
NWONT
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:20 pm

Post by NWONT »

Another point to consider. If anyone calls in a suspected fire the MNR launches a water tanker to check it out. Many are false alarms so we just return to base. Many are real fires so we stop them before they get a chance to roll. There would be hesitation before pumping on a load of mud because its expensive and if its a false alarm, what do you do with the load. We used Trackers back in the 70's and as I recall a load of slurry was about $1200 back then, pretty expensive to throw in the bush. Water is cheap and Ontario has plenty. Getting that first load water on the fire quickly can save millions. Not just in fire fighting costs but in what that wood that is saved does for the economy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bigredone
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:18 am

Post by bigredone »

AT802s return and land at T/O weight(16,000#), Firecats pitch one of the four doors only if they've been in the air less than an hour or so, CV-580s pitch a little as well if they havnt been airborne long, DC6 gets rid of a couple of it 12 doors.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Driving Rain
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: At a Tanker Base near you.
Contact:

Post by Driving Rain »

Yes were pretty lucky in Ontario with all that water. I remember back when we used mostly mud. There was a bad fire in Dryden district in 73 Dryden 7( I think). They dropped so much mud around Tegga Lake that the spring run off carried so much phosphate into it that every fish was killed. It took years for the lake to recover.
Muds great when you don't have water but if you got it might as well use it.
A couple of years ago I was working a fire close to Meadow Lake SK. I was amazed at how fast they could cycle the S2's. They surrounded it with mud while we killed the middle. The two systems work well when combined.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Driving Rain on Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NWONT
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:20 pm

Post by NWONT »

Its been a long time but I don't ever remember one of our piston trackers ( some of which are now firecats ) returning with a load. I don't want to open that can of worms about mudslingers against water tankers but when there is a wind burning embers sail right over red lines so at times you're are just turning kerosene into noise. Waterbombers can hit the head of a fire which cools it down, stops the potential for spot fires miles ahead, then attack the fire itself. I have had little exposure to long term slurry drops but do these aircraft drop on burning structures in residential neighborhoods without damage to buildings and property? A water tanker can adjust its drop height and create heavy rain on homes with no after effects. I realize in places like Montana a few years ago, where there is no water, our machines are not so effective, but we can fill up from a hydrant at an airport alongside a mudslinger, but he can't fill up on a lake like us.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Driving Rain
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: At a Tanker Base near you.
Contact:

Post by Driving Rain »

http://www.pe.com/video/index.html?nvid=186645

Nice landing on Lake Elsinor for the Mars
---------- ADS -----------
 
sky's the limit
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 4614
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:38 am
Location: Now where's the starter button on this thing???

Post by sky's the limit »

The best method to truly put out a fire is to contain it with FW, hit the hot spots with helicopters, and then have the grunts on the ground do the rest. Aircraft alone have a hard time putting out a fire in most ground types, particularly bog/moss etc where the fire smolders under a foot or two of growth.

I'm excited to see some footage of the Mars in action down south, I had the pleasure to work a fire on the west coast of Vancouver Is a couple years ago with both of them. Quite a sight to see. Took these while bucketing:

Image

Image

Image


stl
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tak
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:06 am

Mars gel

Post by Tak »

From the LA Times...

Brought from Canada to help in the firefighting effort, the Martin Mars JRM III was expected to take off from Seaport Boat Launch at Lake Elsinore...

The aircraft carries 7,200 gallons of water, enough to cover an area of four acres. The aircraft was loaded with a mix of water and Thermo-Gel, a material that helps expedite firefighting.

A smaller aircraft owned by the California Fire Department was expected to fly ahead to tell the pilot of the Martin Mars JRM III where to drop a combination of water and Thermo-Gel.

Sooo, here is my Thermo-Gel calculation....

7200 gal x .02 (concentration) is 144 gallons US. I see the stuff retails for about $80 a gallon.

That would be about $11,500 a load!

I guess they don't pay retail or buy it in gallon jugs....LOL

I'm just laffin thinking about trying to trim some planes.... while you take on cargo at 1 ton per second!!!

Tak
---------- ADS -----------
 
arsenal
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 11:59 am

Post by arsenal »

Good air-to-air video of the Mars arriving in California.



http://video.nbcsandiego.com/player/?id=171663
---------- ADS -----------
 
teacher
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2450
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:25 pm

Post by teacher »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Ride
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: West Coastal
Contact:

Post by Ride »

Now it's sounding like they aren't even going to need the mars ....

"UNION-TRIBUNE

October 27, 2007

After all the hassles getting the big Martin Mars water bomber down from Canada to use against San Diego County's fires, the window of opportunity to put the big flying boat into action may have closed. "

"Its arrival Wednesday afternoon was almost a full day late because of problems with the weather – not customs, as was initially reported. It then was barred from flying Thursday because of poor visibility.
With the county's various wildfires now waning, fire commanders are debating whether any of their fires need it. The Martin Mars continued to float on Lake Elsinore yesterday, awaiting a mission. "

:roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
bigsky
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Alberta

Post by bigsky »

Is the MARS still in SoCal?
---------- ADS -----------
 
There is no substitute for BIG JUGS!!
arsenal
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 11:59 am

Post by arsenal »

From:
Martin Mars a hit in California

Gordon Hamilton
Vancouver Sun

Sunday, November 04, 2007

Crews of the Martin Mars water bomber prepare the giant aircraft in front of a wall of smoke.
CREDIT: Mark van Manen/Vancouver Sun
Crews of the Martin Mars water bomber prepare the giant aircraft in front of a wall of smoke.

Californians love the Martin Mars water bomber so much that they may want to keep it.

Port Alberni businessman Wayne Coulson, owner of the last two giant flying boats built for the U.S. Navy in the 1940s, said Sunday that federal, state and civic agencies are working to put funding together to keep one of the planes, named the Hawaii Mars, in San Diego for the remainder of this year's fire season.

The planes have been under-utilized in B.C. flying only three missions in this province during the entire summer. If they don't fly, they deteriorate, Coulson said.

Their fat profile and red-and-white markings have made the waterbombers legendary in B.C. where they have been putting out fires since the 1960s.

But the 60-year-old aircraft are costly to maintain and since purchasing the planes last April, Coulson has been trying to keep them operational by seeking new fire-fighting roles for them outside B.C. California wildfires, which some scientists expect to increase in intensity as a result of global warming, are a natural target for the massive bombers.

They can fly in low and slow and drop 30,000 litres of water per trip. On Oct 24, Coulson took one of them south to aid in the battle against California's wildfires.

The Hawaii Mars flew in fire fighting operations in an around the city of San Diego where it became a symbol of the battle against the fires.

The Mars was described by San Diego fire chief Tracy Jarman as a "super tanker" protecting the city. At their peak, the fires displaced 500,000 people and destroyed more that 1,800 homes throughout Southern California.

A news conference has been scheduled for Tuesday in San Diego, where the Mars is expected to be front-and-centre, doing a practice water-bombing drop in San Diego harbour.

"They are going to see if maybe there is some joint funding they can do to keep the Mars down in San Diego," Coulson said. "Everyone is trying to find a way to keep it there."

The Mars has struck a chord with the Americans. It's the largest operational flying boat in the world and during the Second World War was a familiar sight in San Diego Harbour. An advance copy of Jarman's speech for Tuesday's event expresses the American sentiment over the B.C. aircraft.

"It is historic that this plane has returned to San Diego," the speech states. "When the navy owned it, it was never based here, but it did make flights out of our bay, carrying troops and supplies to Hawaii and the Pacific. Now it is back, serving the citizens of the city, the county and the state in an entirely different capacity."

Currently all fires are either out or under control and California's entire air tanker fleet of 34 aircraft has turned the mop-up job over to ground crews. But the fire season is not over and the Santa Ana winds, annual hot, dry withs from the East, could easily fan fresh blazes.

Over the weekend winds of 80 kilometres and hour were forecast and no fire crews have been sent home yet. If the funding is arranged, Coulson said the Mars will remain in California for the next few weeks or month.

Otherwise, it will be heading straight back to its home base of Port Alberni.

"Nothing has been put into play yet," said Coulson of the drive to keep the plane in the U.S. a little longer. "But we are moving the Mars into San Diego harbour Monday morning. We are hopeful."

Coulson bought the planes last April from former owners TimberWest Forest, which had grown tired of their financial drain. He put together a business plan to determine if they could pay their own way if given enough resources.

He purchased a fuel truck and outfitted a NASCAR-style semi-trailer with all the spare parts and high-tech equipment needed to keep the planes operational away from home. He has said previously he's going to give the planes one year to prove their mettle.

This year's California fires, driven by hot Santa Ana winds, providing a chance for the Mars to showcase its potential.

Coulson said the giant water bomber's presence attracted wide coverage in the battle to contain the blazes, which destroyed more that 1,800 homes.

Their website, MartinMars.com, has has more than 35,000 hits since the plane flew south and every major news organization has covered it. It's the kind of publicity Coulson said the aircraft need if they are to stay operational.

ghamilton@png.canwest.com
© Vancouver Sun
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”