Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

This forum is for non aviation related topics, political debate, random thoughts, and everything else that just doesn't seem to fit in the normal forums. ALL FORUM RULES STILL APPLY.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

User avatar
Sulako
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 2407
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:01 pm

Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Sulako »

Sic 'em Cat!

http://news.windingroad.com/safety/tran ... ng-device/

Image


Speeders in Canada may change their ways, not by their own doing, but by a device devised by Transport Canada.

The device combines a GPS, speed-limit map, and an undisclosed way to manually override a car’s controls.

Transport Canada researcher Paul Boase told the Edmonton Journal, “The technology has the ability of just saying, ‘OK the posted speed limit is 50, so we’ll let you go 55, that’s it.”

The technology was tested on 10 volunteers in the Ottawa area. The device made it difficult, but not impossible, to press the gas pedal down when over the posted speed limit. But, before everyone gets bent out of shape over the device, it will only be used on habitual speeders and traffic offenders – in its initial application, anyway.

Similar to how DUI-offenders get the Ignition Interlock device; a judge could order the speed-limiting device to be installed on repeat traffic offenders’ vehicles.

“What you basically find is for drivers who need (the device) the most, they like them the least,” Boase said. “That’s why habitual offenders might be the right place to start.”
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rowdy
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5166
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: On Borrowed Wings

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Rowdy »

Oh great! Another way for the man to screw ya.

Rotten bastards.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Rockie »

But, before everyone gets bent out of shape over the device, it will only be used on habitual speeders and traffic offenders – in its initial application, anyway.

I guess habitual speeders aren't smart enough to just drive a different car than the one equipped with the limiter.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Cat Driver »

I guess habitual speeders aren't smart enough to just drive a different car than the one equipped with the limiter.
That was my first thought also.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
. ._
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7374
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:50 pm
Location: Cowering in my little room because the Water Cooler is locked.
Contact:

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by . ._ »

If I was rich, I'd buy some cool 50's convertible so I could burn a lot of gas and legally drive without my seat belt.

So I'll have to settle for a 1981 Cadillac with darked out windows so they can't see that I'm not wearing my seat belt. I always speed too, unless road or traffic conditions don't allow me to.

F U C K Big Brother!

-istp :evil:
---------- ADS -----------
 
dangerous
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:24 am
Location: Miramar, California

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by dangerous »

The sad part is that our tax dollars are paying those civil servants to invent and implement useless shit like this.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Yeah. There is a problem. You...because you're dangerous. You're dangerous and foolish - and that makes you dangerous! Now, let's cut the...crap. We've got a plane to fly. Let's try to be on time, okay?"
~Val Kilmer, Saturday Night Live
User avatar
looproll
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1461
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 2:51 pm

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by looproll »

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
Wilbur
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1181
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 11:26 am

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Wilbur »

I'm quite sure that if it ever sees the light of day, laws will be written making rules for it's use. Only a judge could order it placed on your car, and you can bet that same order will outlaw you driving any other car not equipped with the device. If you do, you will be driving while under suspension which means go to gaol, go directly to gaol.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Walker
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Left Coast... (CYYJ)

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Walker »

And I bet some 13 year old kid in the basement would be able to figure out a software workaround in 20 minutes flat, post it to the net and who the hell cares anymore... For myself, I drive a truck that doesn't have a computer.... and its made out of metal..... not plastic......
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Nark
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2967
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: LA

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Nark »

Do you know if any 13 year olds have gotten past the breathalizer/ignition device? I doubt it.

Would you place the same arguement against habitual rapists and pedophiles? Say they put a similar device around the pecker of some asshole who has been convicted (more than once) of a brutal crime. He steps within 100' of a school and he gets zapped.

What is the difference in this case?

Bandaid:

Do you care to describe the accident scenes you roll up too as the result of speed?

The gov is doing something to stop useless accidents, something the public asked for, and now it's an invasion of privacy?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Semper Fidelis
“De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites"-
Do not wish death for your enemy, plan it.
FL_CH
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:59 am
Location: Toronto

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by FL_CH »

Time for a revolution yet?
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Then from 1000 ft AGL until the final capture altitude, the A/C accelerates backwards up along the altitude profile with idle thrust"
Walker
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Left Coast... (CYYJ)

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Walker »

Nark wrote:Do you know if any 13 year olds have gotten past the breathalizer/ignition device? I doubt it.
Actually most people can get passed a hand held Breathalyzer if they know the science behind them and have good mental control. (However in the interest of not promoting drinking and driving im not going to tell people how to go about it,) That being said nark if your interested PM me and ill tell you all about it!

HOWEVER back to cars, no I do not personally know any 13 year olds whom have bypassed a Breathalyzer ignition device, actually iv never seen one in real life, that being said I bet I could have it on a hidden bypass switch inside of 60 minutes, and im not all that clever.

The point i was making about the 13 year old was in reference to the computer age and the speed at which information can be disseminated; such a device is likely only going to be installed on new vehicles, most likely they aren't going to be pissing around with servos/solenoids etc, more likely its going to follow a similar tract thats used on bait cars, where a command is given to the ECU to gradually limit engine power. The system will likely be a remote mounted unit that calculates GPS data, makes a judgment as to vehicular speed and thus sends ECU commands.
Im my totally non expert opinion having only ever heard of this device today I would suggest there are numerous points that could be exploited:

1) (as per the 13year old reference) If you are computer literate, simply rewrite the ECU software and re flash the EPROM with an updated version, have a limiting switch so say, the system is usually armed, unless you engage the rear defrost, with the window lock ON, or some such thing, so it is not immediately visible to someone inspecting the car that anything is out of the ordinary.

2) put something in line from the limiting module to the ECU to interrupt its ability to send data

3) jam, cover, or install something in line to interrupt the GPS sensor (the cars still got to work when your in a tunnle or if the GPS network goes down right?

4) The system may or may not use the GPS data to determine speed, if it is using the cars speedo to determine speed, then bypass the speedo (not that thats a terribly clever thing to do.)

HOWEVER more to the point of the issue (although the above is fun banter it really accomplishes nothing) I think what perturbs me (and most here) is the idea of government interfering in my things or life. I honestly have no issue with a Breathalyzer/lock device installed on offenders cars, nor do I have a problem with a speeding device on a habitual speeders car. What bothers me is the issue of what will happen 5-10-15-20 years from now, just as fingerprints and genetic data collect started out only for serious offenders, over the years it has come to be used on less serious offenders, then people who were charged but not convicted, and now many people who are not criminals are being subjected to what really in many ways is being seen as an Orwellian state. I suppose perhaps I have a very different sense of freedom than some people. Personally I would rather run the faint risk of some nutjob trying to blow me up in a coffee shop over handing over all of the rights and freedoms "I" feel those whom came before me fought and died to produce. I have no doubt that whomever comes up with "most" of these ideas thinks they are doing something positive, but I really must admit I think a lot of unintended harm comes about from misguided logic and thoughtlessness of action before examination.

For example in BC now they are rolling out a beta project for RFID tag'd DLs, for this whole fortress America BS. Well ok, cool, fine nice idea but there are serious security flaws with RFID, irregardless of if "the man" is going to try and track me etc... a nefarious morally flexible individual could have a field day walking around with a palm pilot in her/his bag snatching RFID packets out of the air all day long, after a day of walking though the mall go home and sell the info to some jerkoff in Tennessee whos more than happy to pay $0.25 a head for 10000 names, addresses, DL numbers, Date of birth, height, weight, hair color, eye color, photo in jpg and whatever other mumbo jumbo they decided to toss in there.
but dear god no, don't suggest someone may have dropped the ball here, because the hotshot lobbyists at Intermec tell us its all ok, and please don't cancel our $150 million contract.....


Anywho.... Iv been drinking (but I walked home) its time for bed, -end rant
PS I rocked my IO exam today YEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAA
---------- ADS -----------
 
CD
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2731
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 5:13 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by CD »

Couple of interesting thoughts expressed along those lines:
THE OTTAWA CITIZEN
11/18/2002

Smart card, dumb idea: Biometric ID cards are bad for one reason: they're too hard to replace


Immigration Minister Denis Coderre has suggested that Canadians concerned about security debate the merits of a "biometric" national identity card. Civil libertarians are alarmed about the privacy implications of cards containing so much personal data. But there's another reason to oppose them too: bad engineering.

For the uninitiated, "biometric" cards use sophisticated technology to identify their bearers by some unique physical characteristic recorded on the card. To enter a restricted area, you have to have the card, and the eyeballs or fingerprints to match it. That makes these cards hard to counterfeit.

They're already in limited use by governments and businesses, and the Canadian Air Transportation Security Agency is considering them. But while biometrics" sounds cool, there is a broad problem. Security systems based on it may be unlikely to fail, but if they do fail, the consequences will be very serious.

No one likes failure, but between unpredictable events and predictable human stupidity, it happens a lot. That's why engineers, when designing any safeguard, must ask what the consequences of failure are. (They use the term "ductile" for a system that fails relatively "well" -- that is, in which any failure is either limited or can be fixed quickly. They use the term "brittle" for a failure that will have widespread consequences if things go badly.)

In a perfect world, for example, there would be no car accidents. But between bad weather and bad driving, accidents happen. So in addition to sophisticated vehicle and road designs, automotive safety experts build in a simple safeguard: the seat belt. Likewise, architects first try to design buildings that won't catch fire. But they also incorporate features to minimize the harm should a fire occur, such as smoke detectors.

The Atlantic Monthly recently profiled cyber-security expert Bruce Schneier, who devoted himself to devising theoretically foolproof computer systems -- until one day he realized he was doing it for clients who couldn't program their VCRs. Then he realized, and began to preach, the importance of "ductile" rather than "brittle" security systems. He puts biometric cards in the latter category.

Suppose, he says, all your data is encoded to your thumbprint, and someone hacks into the database. True, you can stop them from using it by cancelling it. But what next? "The bank can issue you a new card with a new number. But (with biometrics) this is your thumb -- you can't get a new one." Identity theft is bad enough with replaceable passports, bank cards and drivers' licences. With a biometric ID card, the only way to get rid of the stolen identity would be permanently to delete the legitimate one as well. That's a nightmare for governments and citizens.

Anyone who has seen the film Minority Report knows what he's talking about. In the movie, a character played by Tom Cruise, whose eyes are biometrically scanned all the time in his futuristic world, has to go to the trouble of getting an eye transplant when he wants to change his identity. Biometrics are definitely "brittle."

Recently, nearly 1,000 traditional Pearson International Airport passes were misplaced. Security supervisors quickly cancelled them (and eventually recovered them). If they'd been biometric, and stolen rather than misplaced, cancelling them wouldn't have been enough. You'd have had to change employees -- hire ones with different thumbs or eyeballs (or go the Tom Cruise route).

In seeking to protect Canada's national security, the specific measures will be as varied as the problems, but they must all share one characteristic. In addition to being designed not to fail very easily, they should be designed not to fail catastrophically.
September 2002 Atlantic Monthly
A top expert says America's approach to protecting itself will only make matters worse. Forget "foolproof" technology—we need systems designed to fail smartly
by Charles C. Mann

Homeland Insecurity

* To stop the rampant theft of expensive cars, manufacturers in the 1990s began to make ignitions very difficult to hot-wire. This reduced the likelihood that cars would be stolen from parking lots—but apparently contributed to the sudden appearance of a new and more dangerous crime, carjacking.

* After a vote against management Vivendi Universal announced earlier this year that its electronic shareholder-voting system, which it had adopted to tabulate votes efficiently and securely, had been broken into by hackers. Because the new system eliminated the old paper ballots, recounting the votes—or even independently verifying that the attack had occurred—was impossible.

* To help merchants verify and protect the identity of their customers, marketing firms and financial institutions have created large computerized databases of personal information: Social Security numbers, credit-card numbers, telephone numbers, home addresses, and the like. With these databases being increasingly interconnected by means of the Internet, they have become irresistible targets for criminals. From 1995 to 2000 the incidence of identity theft tripled.

Full article here...
---------- ADS -----------
 
corporate joe
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 754
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 8:18 am
Location: the coast

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by corporate joe »

Will mod your speed limiter for 50$ call xxx-xxxx
---------- ADS -----------
 
The 3 most important things to remember when you're old:

1) Never pass an opportunity to use a washroom
2) Never waste a hard on
3) Never trust a fart



John Mayer
User avatar
v6g
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 9:01 pm

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by v6g »

I've been wondering when we'd start seeing things like this - I predict that it's only a matter of time before they're mandatory in every new vehicle (10 years maybe). There will be significant consumer reluctance initially (with a hit to the auto industry in the short term after introduction), but after time (and financial encouragement from the insurance industry) it will be coming to a dealer near you.

I design consumer electronic devices with technology very similar to this. While it will always be 'possible' (note emphasis) for the proverbial 13-year-old to 'crack' such a device, if the product is designed well, then it should be extremely unlikely that he/she will ever do so. In software encryption technology we use the term 'unlikely to be cracked' to mean that if, given the entire computing power on earth today, applied to working on cracking a single device, it would take more than the age of the universe to crack. Additionally, should one individual unit be cracked, the cracker has no additional advantage in proceeding with the next device. The foundation of this is PGP encryption.

An example of poorly designed encryption technology (aka non-existent) is the Apple iPhone. The products I work on are in use by 100's of millions of consumers worldwide and none have yet been cracked.

And to the dissenters that argue that it is their human right to drive at whatever speed they wish, can you kindly clarify why you clearly know more about road traffic safety than the professional engineers who design our roads?

I support this initiative, both from a public safety and embracing new technologies perspectives.
---------- ADS -----------
 
2R
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4328
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: left coast

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by 2R »

Be easier and cheaper just to flog the offenders :smt079 :smt079 :smt079
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Cat Driver »

or taser them.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Walker
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Left Coast... (CYYJ)

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by Walker »

Well its one thing to have significant “consumer” resistance, but the more important issue (which once again I think is being lost these days) is what about the significant “citizen” resistance. If the citizenry of a country does not want such devices to be implemented, do you feel that the technocracy has the right to impose them anyway if it will reduce accidents?

And certainly there are other ways to crack encryption over and above brute force attacks, (as a note I read a paper the other day showing how someone broke the US RFID passport encryption with brute force in under 10 minutes, ill see if I can dig it up for you guys.) The ultimate issue here: for every one engineer you employ at a private firm to develop security, there are a 100 tinkeres, students, and other engineers trying to un-develop that security. This has been true with all things, but the issue with the digitizing of this information is once a breach occurs (and there will always be breaches) the damage that can result is exponentially more devastating than if someone managed to pick a mechanical lock on a door.

Granted I have no clue what projects you work on, so I obviously have no right to comment, but I have to admit a product that has 100’s of millions of iterations in circulation that clams to have never had a breach does seem somewhat doubtful. Perhaps no one has done anything nasty with it, but that’s not to say someone hasn’t figured out HOW to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBo_dnQrkCw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH7IhhOh30s
---------- ADS -----------
 
200hr Wonder
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: CYVR
Contact:

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by 200hr Wonder »

Can you say Faraday cage over the GPS antenna anyone?

The problem with technology in general is that engineers NEVER seem to think about failure. Classic example, the controls for my Heat/AC in my truck packed it not long ago. Now if they had been stuck on Defrost then it would have been an inconvenience more than anything at least my windows would be clear. But no the failure mode of this particular unit was to have air pumped out at my feet ONLY, thus my windows would instantly fog up. Same goes for god knows how many products. What about the voting machines. They have no physical paper trail which once a vote is entered can not be altered. How hard would it be to for example have a write once flash memory of some sort and when a vote is registered it permanently records the data on the card. When all is said and done you have a count from that machine of how many votes are for candidate X, Y and Z. Any discrepancies and and you juts re-read the card. Want a re-count? Re-read each physical card. Simple. Dibold managed to screw it up royally! The fact is that engineers are putting way too much technology where you do not need with out thinking about the consequences of failure.

v6g I am sure you disagree with me 100% but I think that every consumer device should come unencrypted. I want to by my iPhone or iPod and make the most of it. Nothing pisses me off more than a company disabling features because they control software (re cell phone companies and phones). If that where the case I could use my iPod any which way I please. Just because I bought an iNail does not mean that I need to pound it into an i2x4 with an iHammer. I could gasp use the Microsoft Hammer if I wanted. Why can I not tweak my cars computer to get more power. Sure I sacrifice engine life and millage, but they is MY choice, I bought the damn thing.


What the consumer world needs desperately is standards. Standards for power adapters, dear god I really want just ONE type of power brick to go from 110V 60Hz AC to anywhere from 2V->48V DC it seems. OK one might be stretching it, but maybe a low power for things like cell phones and a high power for things like video game consoles would work. An HD next gen disk, we have seen how HDDVD and Blueray will work out with VHS and Beta 20 years ago. Lets not even get started on standards in the software world, or M$ lack of ability to adhere to them :evil:

So in conclusion I think engineers are not all they are cracked up to be, some of them should be forced to use the crap they make so that they will re-think there designs. Lets have stuff that fails in an intelligent manner. Lets think ahead lay down some standards and stick to them for the sake of everyone. Lets not go touting technology as the magic bullet because A. it is not and B. someone will always find away around it. Quit screwing the consumer to protect your precious IP. If you make a product that is GOOD and offer services that are VALUABLE people will pay regardless of DRM or Copy protection. FYI I can get around most copy protection schemes faster than I can play within the rules (Windows XP activation after about the 2nd time and you need to call India is a classic example).

Now back to the example at hand, I am sure I would get there at some point. Is this GPS gizmo going to stop people from speeding? Not a chance in hell if they want to. Is going to cost someone there life when a father can't get to the hospital at 2am and ends up with a breach 20miles form the hospital? Probably. So what would be a good use of technology like this? Well first off all, a visual or audio warning when you are exceeding the speed would be good perhaps? Sort of like the seatbelt light or ding. More education for new drives. Perhaps a speed lockout so you that Mom and Dad can make sure little Johnny does not speed. Or maybe even a report so that you can discuss little Johnny's driving habits when he returns home. Treating an adult like a child is going to lead to childish rebellion by some, usually the people are least capable of handling the rebellion.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cheers,

200hr Wonder
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2949
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by rigpiggy »

Or maybe, quit making 300+ hp vehicles capable of 180+kph. Oh i forgot, because in our bigger is better society it's important to have the biggest machine to make up for other smaller things, besides there is higher profit on more expensive cars. Personally the feebate on hi efficiency vehicles should be increased, you want a road warrior, you pay the price. You want simple efficient wheels it won't break the bank.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ottawa,kan
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Kansas

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by ottawa,kan »

I don't know how you extremely smart folks up there get past the breathalyzer key lock, but down here we just let the girlfriend blow in it. Works every time, and gets her the practice she needs. This device will be cracked too. Look at the DVD copy codes. And it doesn't have to be cracked by a hacker. An insider could release the code. I kind of doubt it's safe too. I can see lots of instances where I might want to speed for a minute to avoid some catastrophe, or even a misjudgement on my part, say passing on a two lane road.
---------- ADS -----------
 
TheCheez
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 410
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:53 pm
Location: Trenton

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by TheCheez »

This is just one small step away from the device automatically mailing you a ticket for exceeding a limit.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
1000 HP
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1090
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 8:00 am
Location: South-East Asia

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by 1000 HP »

Canada, the "Elected Dictatorship". Just wait until they decide to put a chip in your brain to see what you are thinking. I recommend the book "1984" for reading. :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Drinking lots of coffee lately, at a nice safe jungle desk, wishing I were flying......
MUSKEG
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 11:49 am

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by MUSKEG »

If everyone HAD to drive at 130 there would be less speeding. Lets put a devise on cars that if it does not reach 130 in 60 seconds it accelerates you there automatically. Again I have ocean front property for sale in paraguay.
---------- ADS -----------
 
l_reason
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:37 am

Re: Transport Canada to mandate speed-limiting devices on cars

Post by l_reason »

I was in traffic court last week, I beat my $325 6 point ticket. There were quite a few people there that had to pay some big fines. One was 186km/h in a 100km zone. He was fined $875 plus the victim surcharge(20%ish) and court costs along with 30 day license suspension.

Why electronically monitor drivers or limit their speed? Whats wrong with the system now? You get points for every speeding or other dumb thing you get caught doing. Once you have 9 you get to talk to the judge about why you should be allowed to drive. If you are smart enough to get your self another 3 point (20km over). You earned the right to walk every where you go. (this is for Ontario)

I would think that chronic speeder would be someone that got caught 4 or more times doing more then 20 over and with the current system you would have lost your driving privileges.

I traded in the 300hp 240km/h car for a slow truck. Now I only get to go fast at work.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Locked

Return to “The Water Cooler”