Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
200hr Wonder
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: CYVR
Contact:

Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

Post by 200hr Wonder »

What is wrong with a cal something like: "Pan Pan Pan This is so and so I am having an engine problem"? Seems to me what I would do.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cheers,

200hr Wonder
trey kule
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4766
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:09 pm

Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

Post by trey kule »

Good Post.

We will discuss it at our next safety meeting.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Accident speculation:
Those that post don’t know. Those that know don’t post
Rudy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:00 am
Location: N. Ont

Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

Post by Rudy »

That's funny, I immediatley assumed it was engine power they were talking about but my co-pilot, like you, thought they meant electrical power. There's lots of new pilots in northern ont. right now and thats going to mean some ambiguous communications for you unfortunately. Nice job giving them their options for airfields.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Liquid Charlie
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:40 am
Location: YXL
Contact:

Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

Post by Liquid Charlie »

Great post and it drives home that ATC wants accurate but short transmissions - we do not need to run a diagnostic for the controllers -- verbosity is a very normal reaction - I would say that this is the one area where smaller carriers can improve in their training departments. We all get the drills and emergencies hammered into us in training but airborne training does not give a good platform to fine tune communication procedures. Most is concentrated on flying the airplane -- which is good but there is a lot more going on. Talking on the radio, to passengers and company tends to be acknowledged in training but not followed through.

Single engine IFR -- while it seems statically safe I still think the "pucker" factor is high and stress levels when the one thing that is allowing you to defy gravity makes you go "WTF" -- a good shot of adrenaline is forth coming.

Good job to the crew -- good decisions always gives everyone the warm fuzzies. :smt023

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
Black Air has no Lift - Extra Fuel has no Weight

ACTPA :kriz:
2milefinal
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 429
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:36 pm

Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

Post by 2milefinal »

This is a pretty good video of how things should go when dealing with an emergency.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9KhZwsYtNDE&feature=related
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by 2milefinal on Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
200hr Wonder
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: CYVR
Contact:

Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

Post by 200hr Wonder »

From the Radio Operators Study Guide:

PAN PAN means the calling station has a very urgent message to transmit
concerning the safety of a mobile unit or a person.

I honestly think it is under used. An engine power problem is certainly very urgent, even if it is only an indication in the end. What Pan Pan does it get everyone's ears who are listening tuned in to you.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cheers,

200hr Wonder
Ogee
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:19 pm

Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

Post by Ogee »

Reminds me of a humorous incident from the mists of time. Trainee operator at Quesnel.

F-ABC: Quesnel Radio-FABC
Quesnel: FABC Quesnel go ahead
FABC: FABC is a 172 out of Williams Lake. 10 south inbound on one engine.
Quesnel: Are you declaring an emergency
FABC: No, this airplane only has one engine.
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8041
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

Post by pelmet »

Does the statement of "we've got one standing at attention" make it clear enough?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Spokes
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:22 pm
Location: Toronto, On

Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.

Post by Spokes »

cpl_atc wrote:
200hr Wonder wrote:What is wrong with a cal something like: "Pan Pan Pan This is so and so I am having an engine problem"? Seems to me what I would do.
I can only assume that the indications were not troubling enough for the crew for them to consider that option. That being said, pilots also notoriously understate the severity of a problem/emergency.

Well, if it was enough to divert for, maybe it should have been.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Wahunga!
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”