Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
-
200hr Wonder
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2212
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:52 pm
- Location: CYVR
- Contact:
Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
What is wrong with a cal something like: "Pan Pan Pan This is so and so I am having an engine problem"? Seems to me what I would do.
Cheers,
200hr Wonder
200hr Wonder
Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
Good Post.
We will discuss it at our next safety meeting.
We will discuss it at our next safety meeting.
Accident speculation:
Those that post don’t know. Those that know don’t post
Those that post don’t know. Those that know don’t post
Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
That's funny, I immediatley assumed it was engine power they were talking about but my co-pilot, like you, thought they meant electrical power. There's lots of new pilots in northern ont. right now and thats going to mean some ambiguous communications for you unfortunately. Nice job giving them their options for airfields.
-
Liquid Charlie
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1461
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:40 am
- Location: YXL
- Contact:
Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
Great post and it drives home that ATC wants accurate but short transmissions - we do not need to run a diagnostic for the controllers -- verbosity is a very normal reaction - I would say that this is the one area where smaller carriers can improve in their training departments. We all get the drills and emergencies hammered into us in training but airborne training does not give a good platform to fine tune communication procedures. Most is concentrated on flying the airplane -- which is good but there is a lot more going on. Talking on the radio, to passengers and company tends to be acknowledged in training but not followed through.
Single engine IFR -- while it seems statically safe I still think the "pucker" factor is high and stress levels when the one thing that is allowing you to defy gravity makes you go "WTF" -- a good shot of adrenaline is forth coming.
Good job to the crew -- good decisions always gives everyone the warm fuzzies.

Single engine IFR -- while it seems statically safe I still think the "pucker" factor is high and stress levels when the one thing that is allowing you to defy gravity makes you go "WTF" -- a good shot of adrenaline is forth coming.
Good job to the crew -- good decisions always gives everyone the warm fuzzies.

Black Air has no Lift - Extra Fuel has no Weight
ACTPA
ACTPA
-
2milefinal
- Rank 6

- Posts: 429
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:36 pm
Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
This is a pretty good video of how things should go when dealing with an emergency.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9KhZwsYtNDE&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9KhZwsYtNDE&feature=related
Last edited by 2milefinal on Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
200hr Wonder
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2212
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:52 pm
- Location: CYVR
- Contact:
Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
From the Radio Operators Study Guide:
PAN PAN means the calling station has a very urgent message to transmit
concerning the safety of a mobile unit or a person.
I honestly think it is under used. An engine power problem is certainly very urgent, even if it is only an indication in the end. What Pan Pan does it get everyone's ears who are listening tuned in to you.
PAN PAN means the calling station has a very urgent message to transmit
concerning the safety of a mobile unit or a person.
I honestly think it is under used. An engine power problem is certainly very urgent, even if it is only an indication in the end. What Pan Pan does it get everyone's ears who are listening tuned in to you.
Cheers,
200hr Wonder
200hr Wonder
Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
Reminds me of a humorous incident from the mists of time. Trainee operator at Quesnel.
F-ABC: Quesnel Radio-FABC
Quesnel: FABC Quesnel go ahead
FABC: FABC is a 172 out of Williams Lake. 10 south inbound on one engine.
Quesnel: Are you declaring an emergency
FABC: No, this airplane only has one engine.
F-ABC: Quesnel Radio-FABC
Quesnel: FABC Quesnel go ahead
FABC: FABC is a 172 out of Williams Lake. 10 south inbound on one engine.
Quesnel: Are you declaring an emergency
FABC: No, this airplane only has one engine.
Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
Does the statement of "we've got one standing at attention" make it clear enough?
Re: Engine trouble? Use clear phraseology.
cpl_atc wrote:I can only assume that the indications were not troubling enough for the crew for them to consider that option. That being said, pilots also notoriously understate the severity of a problem/emergency.200hr Wonder wrote:What is wrong with a cal something like: "Pan Pan Pan This is so and so I am having an engine problem"? Seems to me what I would do.
Well, if it was enough to divert for, maybe it should have been.
Wahunga!


