looking for another video
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore
looking for another video
Its an animated remake of a US constellation emergency landing. it has the overlay of the CVR and the crew is completely clueless
Re: looking for another video
any more details? Do you mean USS Constellation? What a/c type?
Re: looking for another video
thanks but it's not there. ya i think it was a constellation, military of course
Re: looking for another video
so it was the TYPE Lockheed Constellation, not ON THE USS CONSTELLATION 
was it a EC-121 Warning Star? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EC-121_Warning_Star
or maybe you're talking about the GALAXY in this crash:
HERE IS THE VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI5xTmmPbsY
http://www.512aw.afrc.af.mil/news/story ... =123023042
Following a normal takeoff and initial climb, the C-5 aircrew observed a No. 2 engine "Thrust Reverser Not Locked" indication light. Following procedure they shut down the No. 2 engine as a precaution and returned to Dover AFB.
The board determined that during the return to the base:
-- The pilots and flight engineers continued to use the shut-down No. 2 engine's throttle while leaving the fully-operational No. 3 engine in idle.
"The (AIB) performed numerous C-5B simulator flights using similar weather and aircraft conditions as the mishap flight," said Colonel Torres. "Utilizing the number three fully-operational engine as late as 300 feet above the ground, during the same approach flown by the mishap crew, resulted in a safe final approach and landing."
-- Both instructor and primary flight engineers failed to brief the crew, and pilots failed to consider and use a proper flap setting.
"At the mishap aircraft weight, speed, altitude and position, this selection of full flaps was premature," according to Colonel Torres.
-- The pilots' attempt at a visual approach to runway 32 resulted in the aircraft descending well below a normal glidepath for an instrument-aided approach or the normal visual flight rules pattern altitude.
"A normal glidepath would have been approximately 900 feet at three miles, 500 feet at 1.8 miles and 300 feet at one mile. The mishap aircraft was 500 feet at three miles, 300 feet at 1.8 miles and 150 feet at one mile," the colonel said.
Additionally, the aircraft commander failed to give a complete approach briefing that would have included non-standard factors, configuration, landing distance and missed approach intentions. While this was not considered a cause, it was determined to be a contributing factor to this mishap by the board.
"Had a full briefing occurred, it is possible the other pilots or flight engineers would have further discussed these factors, leading to a safe return to Dover AFB," said Colonel Torres.
All 17 people on board the C-5 survived the crash, but three crewmembers were seriously injured when the aircraft stalled, hit a utility pole and crashed into a field about a mile short of the runway. The other passengers and crewmembers sustained minor injures and were treated and released from local hospitals.
was it a EC-121 Warning Star? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EC-121_Warning_Star
or maybe you're talking about the GALAXY in this crash:
HERE IS THE VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI5xTmmPbsY
http://www.512aw.afrc.af.mil/news/story ... =123023042
Following a normal takeoff and initial climb, the C-5 aircrew observed a No. 2 engine "Thrust Reverser Not Locked" indication light. Following procedure they shut down the No. 2 engine as a precaution and returned to Dover AFB.
The board determined that during the return to the base:
-- The pilots and flight engineers continued to use the shut-down No. 2 engine's throttle while leaving the fully-operational No. 3 engine in idle.
"The (AIB) performed numerous C-5B simulator flights using similar weather and aircraft conditions as the mishap flight," said Colonel Torres. "Utilizing the number three fully-operational engine as late as 300 feet above the ground, during the same approach flown by the mishap crew, resulted in a safe final approach and landing."
-- Both instructor and primary flight engineers failed to brief the crew, and pilots failed to consider and use a proper flap setting.
"At the mishap aircraft weight, speed, altitude and position, this selection of full flaps was premature," according to Colonel Torres.
-- The pilots' attempt at a visual approach to runway 32 resulted in the aircraft descending well below a normal glidepath for an instrument-aided approach or the normal visual flight rules pattern altitude.
"A normal glidepath would have been approximately 900 feet at three miles, 500 feet at 1.8 miles and 300 feet at one mile. The mishap aircraft was 500 feet at three miles, 300 feet at 1.8 miles and 150 feet at one mile," the colonel said.
Additionally, the aircraft commander failed to give a complete approach briefing that would have included non-standard factors, configuration, landing distance and missed approach intentions. While this was not considered a cause, it was determined to be a contributing factor to this mishap by the board.
"Had a full briefing occurred, it is possible the other pilots or flight engineers would have further discussed these factors, leading to a safe return to Dover AFB," said Colonel Torres.
All 17 people on board the C-5 survived the crash, but three crewmembers were seriously injured when the aircraft stalled, hit a utility pole and crashed into a field about a mile short of the runway. The other passengers and crewmembers sustained minor injures and were treated and released from local hospitals.
Re: looking for another video
YES this is the one. Thanks alot guys. i wanted to use it for Human Factors groundschool. That CVR is unbelievable, everyone is all over the place
