Apparantly some guy dies from prostate cancer and he is only worth $16,700 but a lady who dies from breast cancer is worth more than $21,800 in research.
I guess its just not in vogue to have prostate cancer.
http://underscorebleach.net/jotsheet/20 ... er-fundingThe politicization of disease: Prostate cancer versus breast cancer
I am saddened the politicization of disease. Sickness should be un-trendy and apolitical. The reality is otherwise.
Breast cancer for women and prostate cancer for men are quite similar afflictions. Consider these projections from the American Cancer Society:
Breast cancer (females) Prostate cancer (males)
New cases (2004) 215,990 230,110
Deaths (2004) 40,580 29,900
Yet in the media and our culture, prostate cancer and breast cancer are far from similar. October is National Breast Cancer Awareness month, and the disease is receiving significant national attention, just as it does every year. Many celebrities have taken up the cause of raising money to fight breast cancer. The Arch in St. Louis is lit pink this month, the first-ever case of supporting for a “cause” by decorating the Arch. This precedent concerns the National Park Service, but they were overruled.
In stark contrast to the “popular” cause of fighting breast cancer is the short shrift given prostate cancer. I’m aware of no groundswell of support from Hollywood to raise awareness about this cancer. I can’t remember the last time I heard about a musician giving a benefit concert to raise money to fight it. And by the way, were you aware that September is National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month? Something tells me you weren’t.
Unfortunately, the disparity between breast cancer and prostate cancer is not merely a matter of media attention. The funding disparity is significant as well, as laid bare here by the National Prostate Cancer Coalition (NPCC):
The United States invests approximately $16,700 to find a cure for each life lost to prostate cancer; more than $21,800 for each life lost to breast cancer, and about $160,000 for each life lost to AIDS.
Furthermore, the NPCC’s “Funding to Find a Cure” PDF shows that in 2003, prostate cancer accounted for 16.6% of cancer cases and 5.2% of its deaths but received just 7.1% of the funding allotted for cancer research.
Of course, the politicization of breast cancer pales in comparison to the attention given AIDS. Awareness and fundraising campaigns for the disease have been taken up enthusiastically by Hollywood and the media elite. In my view, this is truly a misallocation of resources. AIDS is extremely preventable; in fact, prevention is the cure. Attempting to treat the disease, which is a virus, has proven extraordinarily difficult. Breast cancer and prostate cancer, by contrast, are not preventable, and the biggest risk factor of these diseases is not behavior but heredity.
Absolutely AIDS and breast cancer research shoult be funded, and well-funded at that. I simply wish that the funding were not so political.



