Lifestyle/Pay vs. PIC Time

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Post by Cat Driver »

There is no clear answer to this puzzle, there are just to many variables.

We usually have some hint of what the job being offered entails..usually we have little choice and grab a job anyhow, sometmes we luck in and find a good employer and good equipment.

As to the two crew operations the learning curve is far better and safer flying as a first officer with an outfit that splits the flying 50 / 50...the way it should be.

My crew love flying with me because they just automatically sit in the left seat and ocassionally offer me a take off or landing just to see if I can still out think the thing.

If you look at my web site there is a picture of me in the left seat, that was the last three hour leg of the ferry flight from Johannesburg S.A. to Norfolk Virginia via England and the North Atlantic and the only time I sat in the left seat during the whole trip....

The guys insisted that I be in the left seat on the last flight....I managed to out think it. :mrgreen:

Anyhow each of us must do what ever we think is best and some day it will be all over and hopefully it will have been worth it.

Cat Driver:
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
CAL
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1376
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:47 pm

HOLD ON A SEC

Post by CAL »

You mean you guys actually have a freaking choice??? :shock: hahahahaha

Hey! just give me a seat and pay me enough so that I can at least start eating......I will think about being a 747 capt later....then again by the time most of us can even apply for a job in a 747 they will be museum items....
---------- ADS -----------
 
Leeside
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:27 pm

Lifestyle/Pay vs. PIC time

Post by Leeside »

Jiggly Bus couldnt have said it better in both post.....I totally agree with you!
---------- ADS -----------
 
just another pilot
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1069
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Edmonton

Post by just another pilot »

Pick the one that will allow time to go to the food bank :wink: .
---------- ADS -----------
 
ahramin
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 6324
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver

Well said jiggly

Post by ahramin »

What do i need skill for anyway? Luck is my best skill. Wouldn't you all rather fly with a lucky pilot than a good one?

ahramin
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
oldtimer
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Calgary

Life style vs pay/PiC

Post by oldtimer »

As an ex chief pilot responsible for hiring, or advising the boss on hiring, PIC is important and experience is great but I thought that co-pilot time on the right kind of equipment with a responsible operator was just as important as just plain PIC time. and remenber CASH IS KING. 1000 hrs single pilot in a Navajo with Clems Flying Service in Rubber Boot Ont(SASK,ALTA,BC PQ) did not mean as much as 1000 hrs F/O time in a Kingair or Metro with Vouyager, Bearskin, Perimeter, Alta Flights. Time with Jazz or Canadian Regional was worth double the value. Sh#$% or "unprincipaled" operators can have as much if not more negative influence than lack of time. You want to talk lifestyle, I left a Twin Otter job in Northern Manitoba to fly a Cessna 206 with a construction company in Lethbridge. Never once in 10 years did I ever work on July 1 holiday. somebody tried to sell us pagers. Boss says "WHY" Weekends were for my family. Xmas was at home. My kids all grew up with Dad at home and when we are at home celebrating our 38th wedding annivesary, the kids only remember the fun times. Most of my kids are now married and still living with their spouses. They bring the grandkids over because our place is a fun place. Maybe I did something right. I know guys who flew Lears and Hawkers that went 2.5 years without a holiday or a day off. Never ever turn your pager off. Celebrate the millenium in Cabo San Lucas, but family is in Calgary. Wife is bitchy. your stuck in some dumpy hotel. AIDS is a big problem (Aviation Induced Divorce Syndrome). Airlines have schedules. some kinda lifestyle. Sh#$%ty towns, (within reason) if the family is there and are close together, you will make do and be reasonably happy. I left Lynn Lake because of medical problems with one of my daughters. Good move for me. A friend flys a Falcon 900EX and spends more than 200 days a year away from home. The bigger the airplane, the bigger the suitcase. Corperate aviation can be great or it can be the pits. Stick with the airlines. Demand lots of Cash Do the best job you can possible do. You will survive.
---------- ADS -----------
 
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4773
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Post by co-joe »

Wise words old timer! I'd rather be a SO on a 172 and have a good lifestyle than an FO on a Citation X and hate my life. But that's just me. cj
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
KAG
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:24 pm

Post by KAG »

Tough question - PIC or pay/lifestyle....I have a few questions for you.

What is your present experience (hours, ATPL, and so on)?
Will this FO position lead to a left seat position in a resonable amount of time?
What is your debt load like? Can you afford the lower paying gig?
Are you in a huge rush to attain your "end job"?

Where do you want to end up?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The feet you step on today might be attached to the ass you're kissing tomorrow.
Chase lifestyle not metal.
gonnabeapilot
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 2:39 am

Post by gonnabeapilot »

Radio Phone,

You do raise some good points but I'm going to have to disagree with you. PIC time is and always will be a valuable addition to any log book however I think you may have overlooked the significance of the "In Command" part. A low time pilot (which I'd define as under 1500 hours)flying single pilot anything may be the one having to make all the decisions but I'd argue that the lack of experience means that that pilot isn't truly in command of the aircraft. A lack of experience means that the pilot is lacking the foundation to make a solid command decision. It comes down to guess work and I don't think that's the safest option.

In your arguement against 250 hour wonders racing for the right seat job you mentioned CMA so let's go back to them. You see an F/O wandering the halls of YYC learning more about killing time than flying an airplane. What I see here is an F/O who is wandering the halls of YYC happy that he's not digging around in a snowbank somewhere trying to remember where the fuel barrels were burried. You also implied that these F/Os gain experience through lessons taught by Capts who have learned in a similar situation, "the blind leading the blind". What I see is a young pilot who will fly with not one but 20 or so experienced Captains all of whom have different backgrounds and have encountered different situations in the airplane. This F/O can take the best aspects and experiences from each one of these Capts and will have the opportunity to become a much better pilot in return. The F/Os have an equal shot at the flying and any mistake that the F/O does make will result in the Captain calmly correcting it and providing an explanation as to why. Much better than the single pilot alternative where the mistake goes un-noticed and which frequently ends in a newspaper headline. Finally you spoke of a career progression that should start with single pilot vfr then move through to 2 crew etc... Once again I'd have to disagree. From my experience, being the only pilot on board an aircraft has a tendancy to lead to boundaries being pushed. I'm not saying that this doesn't happen in a 2 crew environment but when there is someone sitting in that seat next to you, it's harder to say "I THINK this is what the rule is...", "I don't HAVE to fly that part thanks to my gps" or "I can save some time cutting this out of the SOPs" etc... Starting at 250 hours in the right seat forces a pilot to know the CARs, the SOPs and IFR proceedures down cold or be quickly reminded by the Capt as to exactly what they are. In a single pilot environment, that check isn't in place. Getting back to this thread being about careers I'd have to agree with some of the other posters in saying that because of this, the airlines will put more weight on the resume of someone who has flown 2-crew over someone who's done it solo, especially with CRM being the latest flavour of the week.

Now before the protests come in, let me be clear that this is not a knock against people flying single-pilot. I think that it's great to enhance one's skills. My point is that a pilot should have a solid foundation to base his decisions on before setting out on the single pilot path, and that there's no better way than flying as an F/O for a reputable company.

Cheers,

gonnabe

PS- While I don't really have the background to comment directly on your remark about CMA north of Edmonton, I would like to ask since when is bush flying the be all, end all to being a good pilot? Just because someone doesn't know how to fly overgross, underpowered into gravel strips doesn't mean that they aren't the better pilot. I know which pilot out of the two I'd choose to fly me IFR into a busy, work-intensive environment such as Toronto or New York down to minimas in a high performance airplane. But alas that is for another day, another thread and another cup of coffee. :)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Radio Phone
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 6:30 am
Location: Greyhound Bus Lines...

Post by Radio Phone »

Well, it certainly looks like I'm loosing this one.

As to the CMA comment - I've got some good friends there who I've crossed paths with around say Peace River etc. So picture this. Two pilots, both brought up through the right seat 250 hr route, Capt with 4000+hrs, f/o with 3000+hrs, hardcore IFR day in Peace River, some getting in, some not - everyone holding. NO CAHRTS ON BOARD - nice. They get told to hold at a fix they have no idea where it is, mangae to bullshit enough to avoid being violated.

Why did this happen? A combined 7000hrs+ of flying the same routes with the same clearences and no requirement to THINK or be prepared.

As many of you are stating, the airline seems to be the end goal here. Again I ask, "how many of us actually see big iron?" To tailor your career for the airlines seems a bit narrow minded. So when you have 5000hrs and of flying the same routes day after day, your capacity for adaptation is dulled. How does that apply? Well maybe WJ and AC don't call, but an outfit that flies corperate or internationally does, then what? It's been so long since you flew a route you didn't have memorized that you don't even know where to start. I've seen it happen.

You say you see a pilot walking those halls happy he's not digging barrells out of snowdrift. I see a pilot who because company SOP doesn't use reverse regularly, doesn't know what operating in deep snow is like, doesn't know how to solve his/her own problems when they arise on that one off charter into nowheresville. And never will. I see an arguement about setting a parking brake in 10inches of fresh, I see a pilot who's ability to adapt to new situations is limited. Now I agree that IF this pilot makes the big stuff, it's no big deal, because he/she will never have to deal with any of this. But I go back to my old point of "how many will get there."

If the people doing airline hiring are looking for people who know nothing but the rules, regualtions and SOP's, fine. But those companies that operate the smaller stuff shouldn't be IMHO looking for the same qualities as the job is different.

"What do i need skill for anyway? Luck is my best skill. Wouldn't you all rather fly with a lucky pilot than a good one?"

ahramin

I hope you all find this as frightening as I do.

Again, I am not suggesting we throw people into situations that they can't handle. But I am suggesting that putting people in environments where they can "push the boundries" is very important. Very. The things you learn by making flying's little Ooop's are enormously important. To shun that is plain ignorant. Whether those lessons are learned SP IFR, on floats, skiis or otherwise is here nor there. They are important. That guy walking thorugh the YYC terminal at 500hrs will never KNOW how he reactes when the shit hits the fan. I think that is very important, it breeds conifdence and humillity - very important qualities in a good pilot of any any a/c.

And I never said Bush Flying was the be all and end all. But it is a GREAT palce to start - no question. CP, I'd love to chat with you more in depth about this, you have some very good perspective. Thanks. :)

RP
---------- ADS -----------
 
I'd Rather Be Flying
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 9:24 am
Location: This island earth.

Post by I'd Rather Be Flying »

Back to the original question:

I'd take the PIC flying first. Fortunately, for me, I have the time I want now and I am getting paid well regardless of which seat I'm in.

All is well that ends well.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Come down, your head is in the sky, feet on the ground...come down."
Moving
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 6:22 pm

Post by Moving »

Radio Phone -

"The vast majority of people flying for money in this country will never see jet type rating in their careers."

Why do you say that? (Looking for something a little more than "Because they won't")
What's stopping these people?

Moving (the optimist) ;)
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Right Seat Captain
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 1237
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Various/based CYOW

Post by Right Seat Captain »

I haven't read through all the posts, just too long. But back to the original question, I think it really depends on your situation. You can't answer it as either one or the other is better. If I'm starting a family, I would want a good schedule and money, and I still have a pretty sweet job, with the possibility of moving to left seat with this sweet company sometime in the future. If I'm a fress young strapping lad with no attatchements, I'd take the PIC job for the experience, both flying, and life experiences.

Just my 2 cents
---------- ADS -----------
 
Radio Phone
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 6:30 am
Location: Greyhound Bus Lines...

Post by Radio Phone »

Moving - do the math, there aren't that many jet jobs compared to active pilots....

That said, if things picked up again, there could be lots - then they'd take anyone with pulse wouldn't they! Guess this debate be obsolete??

RP
---------- ADS -----------
 
...
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4581
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:18 pm

Post by ... »

Amen Old Timer...amen.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dockjock
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:46 pm
Location: south saturn delta

Post by Dockjock »

I get a laugh from those so-called "northern" pilots who as someone said, think that their flying is the be-all end-all of aviation jobs. A bit of background- I just started a cushy right seat sked job with one of the airlines mentioned, basically right from the situation Disco was asking about.
My time is 80% PIC SE turbine in 2 crew and single pilot ops. I was looking at a part time 'ho job as captain or RS FO on sweet turbine equipment. Ya everyone says "take the PIC" including me most of the time, but take a look a year or two down the road: What's the next job after the ho? Gotta switch companies...again. In the RS on the other hand, for a bit of time, then upgrade and bam PIC over 12.5 etc. and so forth bobs your uncle...all those fancy acronyms the airlines want are all of a sudden piling up in your logbook.
Ya sure we have to endure snide remarks from Peace, Alta, Borek, Caribou about tromping around in snow with a damn double-breasted suit jacket on but damn guys, we're all doing the same job just with different tools. You'd look just as goofy in your sorels and balaclava walking through the terminal.
I will say this- hiring 250-hr pilot into the right seat of 1900's etc. in my opinion is not really the choice of the pilot. Pretty ignorant to think that folks- 250 hr pilots aren't choosing s$$t, other than what to eat for breakfast. I don't blame any one of them for taking the job though, but the fact is the company hires them because they can pay them crap all and they won't squawk.
But I digress. As far as the comments about no charts in Peace, dude, grow up. Being up north has absolutely nothing to do with that. Could have happened to anyone, hell it probably would have been worse had it been JFK or YYZ doncha think? As far a being prepared- well that's up to the pilot himself, not what airplane or company he's flying for.
For Disco I'd say go with the PIC for now especially if your seniority is protected in the other job. Forget all the macho pilot bs, we're in this as a career and if that advances your career then do it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Disco Stu
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:26 am
Location: Springfield, USA
Contact:

Post by Disco Stu »

Well I made the career over lifestyle decision.

6 month tour on the bag run, then back to turbine equipment.

Total potential loss of income = $3600+

Schedule goes from 1 week on, 1 week off, to M-F, 0600-2030, all weekends and civic holidays off. So much for the canoe trips.

After 6 months, if there is no turbine Captain slot, back to the sweet FO job hopefully. No loss of seniority.

With the soon addition of over 12500 equipment, and the Captain ATPL requirement that accompanies those planes, the decision became a no-brainer. Ain't gonna get the A sitting in the right seat!

Looking forward to the experience and the chance to scare myself stupid hopefully no more than once.

2500 turbine FO is lots, time to try something new and challenging.

Should be fun.
---------- ADS -----------
 
canadian_bacon
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:09 pm
Location: Prairie & Northern

Post by canadian_bacon »

I'm sure that more that one operator would agree that they would rather hire a 2000 hr pilot that has gained time in the left seat of a 206 than one that has gained time from the right seat of a twin.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Panama Jack
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3265
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:10 am
Location: Back here

Post by Panama Jack »

Take the money and schedule. That is what matters more in life. By the time you get to that point, the mega-salary airline jobs (and possibly Air Canada) will be gone and a Captain on a heavy jet may not earn more than a $100K flying international. You going to sacrifice lifestyle for that? Enjoy your career while you can. Get the most you can, and take more priority in lifestyle because the big bucks will be fewer and fewer.

Time to cash in on your training investment.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”