Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Four1oh.....you are indeed correct.
____________________________________
I'm just two girls short of a threesome.
I'm just two girls short of a threesome.
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Well then... he's proven a fool twice.
Drinking outside the box.
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
This so-called expert (Hall) was a political appointee, and never an investigator.
-
props ahead
- Rank 1

- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:01 pm
- Location: FarAway
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Ground all aircraft so everyone can travel by bus,car,train,boat because they are all proven 100% safe 100% of the time!
There is something missing here though courtesy of the Star. I just cant believe he would publicly say something that stupid.
There is something missing here though courtesy of the Star. I just cant believe he would publicly say something that stupid.
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Jeez, Hedley,
if we ground all aircraft so theirs no accidents, there would be no TSB, NTSB etc. Think of the jobloss!!!
if we ground all aircraft so theirs no accidents, there would be no TSB, NTSB etc. Think of the jobloss!!!
-
Joe Blow Schmo
- Rank 5

- Posts: 357
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:48 am
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Looks like he runs a consulting company which, amongst other things, provides "expert testimony". Perhaps he's looking to make some money off of a few lawsuits.
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Interesting comment about heated wings vice de-ice boots though... eh?
Thoughts
Thoughts
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
To put this in a sad perspective, in the last 5 days ………420 people have been killed in US car crashes since this Q400 went down. Are we up in arms about that? 
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
More likely a vested interest in this little law firm:airbournesailor wrote:Probably has shares in a regional jet manufacturing company or an airline that only flies jets!!
http://www.nolan-law.com/
But considering his current job, it all makes perfect sense.Tim wrote:wow, considering his former job, you'd think he know his advice doesn't make any sense.
http://www.nolan-law.com/staff/attorneys/james-e-hall/
Otherwise known as a Washington insiders male reproductive organ suction applicator.W5 wrote:This so-called expert (Hall) was a political appointee, and never an investigator.
BP
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Not quite right... I was flying the ATR back then (have about 3000hrs on it) and if you remember correctly, the FAA did, in fact, GROUND the whole ATR fleet and TC followed suit. Hell, for about a year CRA were doing our skeds for us, and we were jumpseating on the DH8-300 to give them support.jigger79 wrote:I fly the ATR and will bet that the Dash 8 will now have to go through all the icing bullshit that the ATR had to go through.
Funny though, they're not talking about grounding a fleet of North American (Canadian) made aircraft although they suspect the same cause of accident.
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Catch rate is based on a combination of airspeed and airfoil design,no? That's what would totally suprise me about this aircraft being of DeHavilland origin.
-
wallypilot
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:59 pm
- Location: The Best Coast
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
I am surprised no one has picked up on this comment yet. what a bafoon.monkeyspankmasterflex wrote:http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/588565Hall said aircraft with turboprop engines fly at slower speeds than jets, making it easier for ice to accumulate.
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Maybe perhaps the reason for this is because the NTSB feels at this point it is not a fault of the airplane, but loss of situational awareness? (i.e. letting the aircraft slow to the point of stall, then incorrect recovery?)SkyLounger wrote:Not quite right... I was flying the ATR back then (have about 3000hrs on it) and if you remember correctly, the FAA did, in fact, GROUND the whole ATR fleet and TC followed suit. Hell, for about a year CRA were doing our skeds for us, and we were jumpseating on the DH8-300 to give them support.jigger79 wrote:I fly the ATR and will bet that the Dash 8 will now have to go through all the icing bullshit that the ATR had to go through.
Funny though, they're not talking about grounding a fleet of North American (Canadian) made aircraft although they suspect the same cause of accident.
JMHO
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1234929 ... malertNEWSThe commuter plane slowed to an unsafe speed as it approached the airport, causing an automatic stall warning, these people said. The pilot pulled back sharply on the plane's controls and added power instead of following the proper procedure of pushing forward to lower the plane's nose to regain speed, they said. He held the controls there, locking the airplane into a deadly stall, they added.
If this is the cause (seems likely now), then Hall should go crawl into a little hole and never come out. Or save face and come out publicly saying he was wrong, then go into his hole.
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
monkeyspankmasterflex wrote:"But this does not sound like anything related to the aircraft. This sounds like it is related to some other issues that have yet to come out."
Hall isn't the only one making questionable statments in this article. Nobody knows yet wether it is related to the aircraft or not. I'm sure that Deluce would be very happy if it didn't have anything to do with the aircraft (if that's even possible).
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Wasn't it exactly the same thing that was suspected initially with the Roselawn accident? F/O alone in cockpit, Captain chatting in the back with the F/A, airplane flying into supercooled water droplets?1973-150L wrote:Maybe perhaps the reason for this is because the NTSB feels at this point it is not a fault of the airplane, but loss of situational awareness? (i.e. letting the aircraft slow to the point of stall, then incorrect recovery?)SkyLounger wrote:Not quite right... I was flying the ATR back then (have about 3000hrs on it) and if you remember correctly, the FAA did, in fact, GROUND the whole ATR fleet and TC followed suit. Hell, for about a year CRA were doing our skeds for us, and we were jumpseating on the DH8-300 to give them support.jigger79 wrote:I fly the ATR and will bet that the Dash 8 will now have to go through all the icing bullshit that the ATR had to go through.
Funny though, they're not talking about grounding a fleet of North American (Canadian) made aircraft although they suspect the same cause of accident.
JMHO
They grounded the whole fleet regardless and then found out what might have happened...
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
i believe this Gentleman is acting on emotions and not logic
-
crazy_aviator
- Rank 8

- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:13 am
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Im thinking that the Q400 fleet should be grounded along with ALL pilots who fly the plane UNTIL it is verified whether the plane can be flown safely with stick pusher operating or with the ASI covered up OR whether the " Qualified " pilots are qualified to fly the plane without making any mistakes !! ( Am i starting to sound like a certain ex-ntsb investigator? )
-
pointyertoes
- Rank 3

- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 11:42 am
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
There is no way that such action would be justified. Hundreds of Q400s are being flown and have flown millions of hours in icing conditions. (I have accumulated a great deal of ice in this airplane and consider it the most capable turboprop to operate in these climates).crazy_aviator wrote:Im thinking that the Q400 fleet should be grounded along with ALL pilots who fly the plane UNTIL it is verified whether the plane can be flown safely with stick pusher operating or with the ASI covered up OR whether the " Qualified " pilots are qualified to fly the plane without making any mistakes !! ( Am i starting to sound like a certain ex-ntsb investigator? )
Why aren't all 777's grounded after multiple uncommanded (and unexplained) thrust rollbacks on the GE90 engine? (The BA incident leading to a very near catastrophe) Could it be because there is MUCH more financially at stake for Boeing and they have the PR budget of a small western country?
Come back when you have something intelligent to say.
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
Four1oh wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't a faster airplane have a higher catch rate than a slower airplane? I don't feel like cracking the books to look it up...Hall said aircraft with turboprop engines fly at slower speeds than jets, making it easier for ice to accumulate. He was also critical of turboprop de-icing technology – air-filled rubber "boots" that expand and contract to dislodge ice, instead of the in-wing heaters used on jets to keep ice from forming.
I'd hate to see how quickly the ice use to build up on the SR-71.....kidding.mcrit wrote:Four1oh.....you are indeed correct.
I'm not a jet guy...but that's only true up to about 350kts?
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
You start to get enough aerodynamic heating at around M0.8-0.9 or so to burn off ice, but if you're doing that kind of speed you're not likely to be on approach. Best dude to ask about that is AuxBatOn, I think he mentioned something about burning off ice at around 450 kts.C-GPFG wrote:
I'm not a jet guy...but that's only true up to about 350kts?
____________________________________
I'm just two girls short of a threesome.
I'm just two girls short of a threesome.
- Ref Plus 10
- Rank 5

- Posts: 316
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:00 pm
- Location: Wherever the winds may take me...and the paycheque
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
I'd ground an aircraft after it crashed too! At least until it's fixed 
-
IRAcontractor
- Rank 0

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:15 pm
Re: Ground turboprop aircraft, expert says
I wonder if it's the American way to try and get rid of FOREIGN products....I mean most large turboprops are NOT American built.....see where I am headed with this. Protectionists trying to ground foreign built turboprops, BUY American Built Jits only! 





