Cat Driver wrote:So, just to clarify for one of those "wannabe lawyers", if I get charged for breaking a Canadian Aviation Regulation, but it doesn't endanger lives or it's considered a pointless rule by an AvCanada expert,
I assume you are directing this at me?
Yes, in part, that was directed at you. Just as I assumed that goldeneagle was directing the "wannabe lawyer" comment at myself, as I was the first poster to bring up the legality of what Sully wanted to do. You did mention the "endangering lives" part but the "pointless rule" part was posted by canpilot. Just trying to multi-task and debate more than one person with an opposing viewpoint at the same time.
Cat Driver wrote:Can you point out exactly what regulation Sully would have been breaking?
Sure. In my opinion, CAR 401.28(1) based on not meeting the requirement found in 401.28(2)(c)
http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Regse ... htm#401_28 Again, I can't take credit for discovering that as it was repeatedly referred to in the past posts I linked to in my first post on this topic.
Cat Driver wrote:As to the regulations and breaking of same get back to me after you have over fifty years in this industry and let me know how you never were in a position where you ended up braking some regulation.
Ok, I never said anything about
not breaking regulations. I mentioned being charged and having to defend myself against said charge. In my poor attempt to try to get a point across, I was trying to say that disagreeing with, just as ignorance of, a regulation is not a defence.
Cat Driver wrote:I may not be an expert in your opinion but maybe we could compare our backgrounds in aviation and then examine the safety part.

In my opinion, you
are an expert. You have seen and done things in aviation that many who read your comments and thoughts can only dream of doing. But comparing backgrounds would be pointless as mine is neither as lengthy nor as spotless as yours (please, no penis jokes!

). However, I believe that having experienced such a bumpy road in my relatively short career has given me some insight on protecting my licence as well as my livelihood. Some may call it paranoid but I would rather cover my bases (and my ass!) than subject myself as well as my family to some of the things I have seen and heard. And if I can help out others by pointing out things so they don't have to experience some of the negative crap that this industry can bring, I will continue to do so, even if that means I open myself up to the possibility being ridiculed or labelled.