question about upper air analysis charts

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Tim
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1026
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 6:16 pm

question about upper air analysis charts

Post by Tim »

anyone know what the stations with the dotted circles around them mean?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Matthew
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 6:03 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: question about upper air analysis charts

Post by Matthew »

I was told that they are positions of reporting stations whose information has been excluded from the making of that particular chart.

In other words....just there to throw you off :)

Matt.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
FREEFALL
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 1:49 pm
Location: T.I.

Re: question about upper air analysis charts

Post by FREEFALL »

Matthew wrote:I was told that they are positions of reporting stations whose information has been excluded from the making of that particular chart.

In other words....just there to throw you off :)

Matt.

To add a little more....the station's data that is circled was not used in the creation of the chart because it's data was way off of what was expected to be reported by said staion relative to surrounding stations.
---------- ADS -----------
 
If riding in a plane is FLYING. Then Riding in a boat is SWIMMING!
Tim
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1026
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 6:16 pm

Re: question about upper air analysis charts

Post by Tim »

any idea why the data would be so far off?

edited for clarity
---------- ADS -----------
 
Changes in Latitudes
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2396
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:47 am
Location: The weather is here, I wish you were beautiful.

Re: question about upper air analysis charts

Post by Changes in Latitudes »

There's a fair bit of reasons for erroneous upper air data. Poor soundings, equipment malfunctions both in the air and on the ground (radiosonde sensor failure, ground receiver failure), human error...etc. Sometimes the computer algorithms designed to filter out garbage data misinterpret certain parameters and toss out good data as well. The onus lies on both the observer and organizations like NCEP or Environment Canada to subjectively AND objectively filter out poor data. To be brief, it's quite a task.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”