* AvCanada's Home Page * Photo Gallery * Directory * Topsites *Weather *Enter Chat * Media Kit
It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 6:05 am



All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is chatting

Who is chatting
Enter Chat




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Crossflow
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:25 pm 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:13 am
Posts: 247
Could anyone out in the homebuilt world offer some insight on the Crossflow Subaru engine conversions. I have heard rumors of of greatness. It seems that the Crossflow website no longer exists, is this true or is it just being revised/updated. If anyone does have a working link to Crossflow could you please send it. I have reached the end of my limited Goggle skills with no success. Cheers,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:05 am 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:29 am
Posts: 345
They were based in Collingwood but lately their hangar looks abandoned. I asked locally and no one seems to know where they moved to.

Jim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:35 am 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:13 am
Posts: 247
I guess that puts a nail in that idea. I have a subby engine block that I had hoped to rebuild. If you hear anything further could you shoot me note, thanks for the reply.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:40 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 4:44 pm
Posts: 1395
Location: NWO
2 words....

Lycoming & Continental..


PLEASE!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:05 pm 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:13 am
Posts: 247
Jungle Jim,
I have tried a couple of different phone numbers, Collingwood, Shelburne and Nottawasaga. They all go unanswered or a recorded "no longer in service" guess that answers the question. Cheers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:59 pm 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:29 am
Posts: 345
I agree with Strega. I had a turbocharged, planetary gear drive, Subaru engine in my first plane and although it ran ok, it was always on my mind that it really wasn't a proven system. Also when things do go wrong the Lycoming, Continental and Franklin engines are easy to fix, parts are available and there's no shortage of knowledgeable people that can troubleshoot and repair these engines at most airports. I found that when it was all done there really was not a cost savings over a conventional aircraft engine. Since then I had a Stinson with a Franklin and now fly behind a Lycoming in the Thorp T18. There's nothing worse than having an airframe that is ready to fly but can't because of engine/redrive issues. Even looking at the Eggenfeller conversions there have been about a dozen revisions and versions which leads one to believe the changes/improvements were needed to address "issues" or shortcomings.

Jim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:04 pm 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:13 am
Posts: 247
Ok Jungle Jim, Strega you have convinced me on the value of a more "conventional" engine, plus some research. Would either of you two fine gentleman consider it foolish to "re-build" one. Certainly parts for the bid two are easy to find. What would be your choice in the 180/ 250 hp range.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:30 pm 
Offline
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator

Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:21 am
Posts: 3526
Location: Vancouver
Lycoming O-360.

Personally, I like the Chevy V8 though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:42 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7

Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 553
Mid time O-540's are generaly cheaper than a O-360. What kind of plane are you building?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:25 am 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:13 am
Posts: 247
Originally I was very seriously considering building a BD-4, they appear to be one of the easier homebuilts, I like alluminum. I can't afford any of the quick build kits offered. However after a long look at my intended flying I will likely settle on a re-build of an existing airframe. I am now on the hunt for a suitable, long forgotten project hiding in the back recesses of a hanger or barn, once loved but now pushed aside. First choice is one of the earlier Maules, this airplane will live on floats FOREVER. Why are the 540's better priced, less market? What could one expect to shell out for a rebuildable one? Oh heck well I'm asking does anyone out there know of a long forgotten Maule project? I might even try to convince the local MDRA that I have or will meet the 51% rule and call it a homebuild otherwise OM is a clear avenue also.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:56 am 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7

Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 553
RV builders drove up the price of O-320's and O-360's it seems. There is a BD4 with a O-540 near Edmonton. Climbs like crazy. Check out Barnstormers for used engines. MOT can't hassle you over importing engines and props.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 2:35 pm 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:29 am
Posts: 345
With respect to rebuilding one of the conventional engines, this is easily do-able. I rebuilt my Franklin engine with oversight by my AME. You will need to have your torque wrenches and measuring tools calibrated and you will need all the manuals. You will find that the paperwork with measuring and recording the measurements of the components will take longer than the actual hands-on time. It's still quite an expensive venture when you add the costs of sending the parts out for inspection and overhaul if required. It is satisfying when it is all done though.

Jim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:33 pm 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:13 am
Posts: 247
Thanks Jungle Jim here iscouple of thoughts for your consideration and feedback. Does the need for AME oversite, certified overhaul etc. still exist if the final product is being used in a homebuilt or OM aircraft. Using of the correct manuals, calibrated tools and proper procedures come under the heading of safety first definately, even some AME input would be wise.

Cheers,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:03 pm 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:29 am
Posts: 345
Mapleflag,

No, the need for AME oversight does not apply for a homebuilt or O/M aircraft but some oversight by an experienced person would be a good idea. In the case of my Franklin, I run a tool shop so the calibration of tools was easy. There was still a lot of stuff that had to be sent out for testing and overhaul that I was not comfortable in doing. Examples being, crank, cylinders, mags, engine mount, cam, etc.

Jim


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:45 am 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:05 am
Posts: 28
Crossflow is no longer in the engine business. They were not good on delivering what they promised; people waited years for their engines, then had problems. In my opinion, they were asking too much from the engines. Too much horsepower promised for long life. The six cylinder Subaru is 3.3 litres; 199 cubic inches, and they were proposing to replace 340 hp engines with it.

Lots of Subarus flying in various applications. At reasonable horsepower ratings, there is no reason it will not be reliable. One of the converters recently published the steps necessary to build an aircraft Subaru. Lots of internal details are important.

Robinson seems to have got the Chevy V8 working very well in his conversions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:21 am 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:13 am
Posts: 247
115B,

Do you recall which supplier/converter it was that published the conversion process? Was it a downloadable document?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crossflow
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:41 am 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:05 am
Posts: 28
It was an article; possibly in Kitplanes, detailing all the things one of the conversion experts does to ensure long life in a converted Subaru.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 


All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

 
For questions/comments please send them to
webmaster@avcanada.ca


AvCanada Topsites List
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

While the administrators and moderators of this  forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as  quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. If you feel a  topic or post is inappropriate email us at support@avcanada.ca .  By reading these forums you acknowledge that  all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and  not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these  people) and hence will not be held liable. This website is not responsible or liable in any way for any false or misleading messages or job ads placed at our site.   

Use AvCanada's information at your own risk!

We reserve the right to remove any messages that we deem unacceptable.
  When you post a message, your IP is logged and may be provided to concerned parties where unethical or illegal  behavior is apparent. All rights reserved.