Dubai

Discuss topics relating to airlines.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

User avatar
Panama Jack
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3263
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:10 am
Location: Back here

Re: Dubai

Post by Panama Jack »

jonny dangerous, rumour has it that Abu Dhabi already has taken a majority interest in Emirates' as a condition for the bailout. Of course, you won't see this published publically as there are reputations and face at stake here, and despite regional rivalries, the sheiks and royals in the region have more in common than they have differences.

But there is nothing like a bit of jet blast in the morning, and here is one article from a British publication:
This is a rough time for the cute Russian whores in the fetid nightclub of the Dubai Metropolitan hotel, plying their wares for 50 quid a go.

Even during the boom days they outnumbered the punters by about five to one; now, all the money has run out and the European expats will soon be leaving.

What will they do, these viciously bleached blonde Katyas and Natashas from Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan?

They won’t sell themselves to the berobed local Emiratis, whom they loathe. I suppose they will have to go home and the whore-traffickers will be out of work too.

Perhaps one day soon there will be only Emiratis left in Dubai — its population dropped by 17% at the start of last year’s credit crunch and now there’s much, much, worse to come because there is no money to pay for anything. The desert will reclaim the expensive hotels with their bling-encrusted lobbies and opulent suites for the likes of Paris Hilton, who once turned up here to open a mall and was indistinguishable from her surroundings.

And the sea will wash away those hideous palm-shaped islands where our cheaper celebs spend spring weekends, the expat apartment blocks will crumble into dust, the scorpions will return and Dubai will be what it was in the 1960s, a frowsy fishing port in a scorched and very backward Third World country, with a moral code for the indigenous population drawn from AD 1335. And the rest of us will look on and wonder: what powerful but unrecorded race / Once dwelt in this annihilated place? Well, hell, you can hope this might happen. Better that than what it has been these past 15 years.

Dubai is wrecked but, like an old tart with a kiss-and-tell contract from the red-tops, threatens to drag the rest of us down with it. In a sense it is merely Britain writ much larger: a despised, criminally underpaid and perpetually ill-treated underclass of imported foreign labourers on top of which squats a fat, indigenous population which cannot believe its luck, doing absolutely nothing other than spending money.

A property boom so absurd in its assumptions and aspirations that its imminent implosion was evident to everyone — except, of course, the bankers who mindlessly bought into the deal and funded it.

And then there’s the over-remunerated elite of western European expats who are now trying to get the hell out, binning their Porsches at the airport, kissing goodbye to their obliging Filipino slaves. What’s Dubai, without its money? Some rocks, some sand, some Islam, some flies.

We are dragged down because our bankers — the ones who dropped us in it last year — bought into this bizarre fiction too. Dubai has a £48 billion debt default and this has a knock-on effect for our own RBS, which was Dubai’s biggest loan arranger to the tune of some £1.4 billion, and HSBC, which has some £10 billion tied up in the state, and Barclays, which has an estimated £3 billion investment there.

The stock market fell by 3% when it became clear to the money men that Dubai was a busted flush — late last week (well spotted, boys).

It was evident to most of us a year ago that Dubai was well and truly rogered, when the plush apartments were not selling anywhere near as quickly as they should have been and the city had to go cap in hand to its more cautious partner, Abu Dhabi, for a bailout.

But you might have guessed even before 2008 that Dubai was heading for a fall, that its economy did not actually seem to be founded on anything tangible, aside from the exploitation of Bangladeshi labour.

Our banks were grabbed by the moment, by the Dubai hype, and they swallowed it whole. It should be a bigger lesson to them than the collapse of last year, but you would not bet that it will be a lesson learnt.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commen ... 936316.ece

P.S. You won't see this one republished in the Middle East either. :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
“If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.”
-President Ronald Reagan
ScudRunner
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3239
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:58 am

Re: Dubai

Post by ScudRunner »

Hold the Phone here people I thought Emirates was a private company? :rolleyes:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009 ... ubai-debt


Dubai authorities may be forced to put up Emirates airline as debt collateral

Emirates airline: a potential pawn in Dubai's scramble for financial stability. Photograph: James D. Morgan/Rex Features

Dubai's flagship airline, Emirates, has emerged as a potential pawn in the city state's scramble for financial stability.

One of the world's fastest growing carriers, the scale of Emirates's ambition is underlined by its status as the biggest customer for the A380 super-jumbo and its lavish sponsorships of leading European football clubs including Arsenal and Paris St Germain.

But financial experts believe the airline's future could be determined by Dubai's sister emirate, Abu Dhabi, which could demand ownership of the company for bailing out its neighbour if the troubles at Dubai World worsen. Emirates is owned by the Investment Corporation of Dubai, which is in turn controlled by the Dubai government.

"It [Emirates] could be on the table. It is one of Dubai's crown jewels, it has very strong market reputation and it also acts as a hub between Asia, the Middle East and Europe," said Vivek Tawadey, head of credit portfolio strategy at BNP Paribas.

If Emirates continues its present growth trajectory it could become the world's biggest long-haul carrier within a decade. It has ordered 58 A380s, each with nearly 500 seats, as it strives to make Dubai a major international travel hub, linking Europe and North America to the Middle East, Asia and Australia. In stark contrast with most of the international airline industry, the carrier is also profitable, posting a net profit of £163m after carrying 22.7 million passengers last year.

Cynical executives at rival airlines, browbeaten by losses, disparage Emirates's profitability and argue its strong performance is propped up by covert state aid in the form of subsidies for fuel and landing fees. The airline's chief executive, Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed al-Maktoum, is the uncle of Dubai's ruler, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, but the airline says it pays the same fuel prices and landing fees as other carriers.

Tim Clark, Emirates's president, was angered at an airline conference last year when he was publicly accused by fellow executives of enjoying state assistance, something the former BA executive denies vehemently.

Emirates was back on the defensive today as it reacted to speculation that it could be forced to merge with the Abu Dhabi carrier, Etihad.

Maurice Flanagan, Emirates vice-chairman, described the media response to Dubai World's request for a debt moratorium as "hate Dubai week".

In an interview with Bloomberg he added: "You wouldn't know it from the media comment, but Dubai has a number of substantial businesses."

Etihad said there are "no talks" about a deal with Emirates.

An aviation industry source said the Dubai government would be loth to let the airline go. "It's the family silver. Although the airline cannot decide whether or not it is sold, it is probably the last thing that the government would want to go under the hammer," the source said.

It is understood that some of Emirates' business partners would not be averse to a deal nonetheless. Arsenal signed a sponsorship deal worth £90m with Emirates in 2004 and is believed to have received the majority of the airline's investment already, with £28m outstanding. It is understood that Arsenal is aware of more lucrative deals being signed by its Premier League rivals and would not complain if Emirates scrapped a contract that gives the carrier naming rights over Arsenal's stadium until the 2020-21 season and a shirt sponsorship deal until 2013-14.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Jastapilot
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 832
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:42 pm

Re: Dubai

Post by Jastapilot »

---------- ADS -----------
 
W5
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1005
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Edmonton,AB

Re: Dubai

Post by W5 »

Dubai May Defer, Cancel $29 Billion of Airbus, Boeing Jet Orders, WSJ Says

Dubai Aerospace Enterprise may defer or cancel $29 billion of orders for 200 aircraft, divided equally between Airbus SAS and Boeing Co., the Wall Street Journal reported, citing unidentified people familiar with the matter.
As an alternative, the state-controlled Dubai aircraft-leasing company may try to switch the orders to Emirates Airline and FlyDubai, the newspaper said.

The cancelation threat stems from Dubai's parlous financial state, the Journal said, adding that Dubai Aerospace, Airbus and Boeing all declined to comment.

http://www.bloomberg.com/
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Airline Industry Comments”