spinning

[Tango01]

Aux, I do understand now how you went about it. Good call to have somebody monitoring your flying. You obviously have a lot more experience than me, its just something I wouldn't do at this stage unless I went up with somebody and/or practiced at a safe height.

To your defence from what Michael was saying, here is a textbook example:


Return to runway after simulated engine failure at 800'AGL. Flaps, slip, and slight s-turns were utilized to minimize chance of overrun.

Aircraft is a late 1970s C172, 160 HP. Climb performed at Vy; 6 second delay after engine failure and before turn started; turn airspeed is 75kts. Density altitude is around 1000' and headwind is about 15 kts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNgoOFq87aY

[Tango01]

One more thing. This topic started as a spin entry question. To help out the OP, he/she is asking how to spin the C172P. I hope this video gives you an idea. Read what 5x5 and BPF said also.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxBQBEMyuUw


Gotta love youtube!

[ry6198]

Hey Lance what i always did was when you are going to spin to the left is to have a bit of right rudder on then just before the stall kick full left rudder and give a little shot of power, and then as soon as the a/c starts to drop its wing i pull the power to idle. just what i did to get the 172 going into a good spin and it worked for me

[AEROBAT]

I have never seen a 172 stay in a true spin once you relax the control inputs. Flying in the utility C of G I think they won't stay in a spin. I never have flown a P model the newest was an M with LR tanks I used to own. I found I had to almost snap it into a spin, that being fairly abrupt use of the controls and a dash of power. Even then it would stop the rotation after a couple of turns when you relaxed the input, power at idle of course.

The 150 will stay in a spin however.

[Old Dog Flying]

"The Cessna 172 of any model does not spin when in the utility category.

If you try to spin it in accordance with the POH it will spiral every time."

Pretty broad statement but then again our resident expert from Dear Old Blighty probably has never spun an older model C172...and yes Michael they do spin power off without developing into a spiral...but then again they were not designed and built in Britain.

Only the second day of 2010 and his nibs is at it again, slamming anything and everything on the left side of the "Pond"

[mcrit]

Past the PPL, sure. It teaches the student to fly the airplane in its whole envelope and gives him 1 more thing that he can use in case shit hit the fan.

Here's a good example on a succesful one:

For most light trainers there is no part of the envelope that allows the pilot to turn back to the runway if the engine dies below ~1000 AGL. The 172 has a best glide of ~65 KIAS and a climbs out around 75 KIAS. There is no energy to zoom, the gear is down and welded, and the prop doesn't fx. Your best bet for survivial if you lose the engine on T/O is to hit the softest thing in front of you.

As for how to spin a 172, cgzro had it best. When you hear the stall warning go come back fully on the yoke and put in the rudder. It will spin, but it won't stay in past 3-4 rotations.

[AuxBatOn]

For most light trainers there is no part of the envelope that allows the pilot to turn back to the runway if the engine dies below ~1000 AGL. The 172 has a best glide of ~65 KIAS and a climbs out around 75 KIAS. There is no energy to zoom, the gear is down and welded, and the prop doesn't fx. Your best bet for survivial if you lose the engine on T/O is to hit the softest thing in front of you.

As stated in a subsequent post, I have done it well below 1000' and landed succesfully. I'll take that over a field any day.

[AEROBAT]

A spin is a autorotation induced by yaw coupling, Auto meaning "self". If it comes out on it's own once control inputs are stopped full autorotation did not develop. In a 172 in utility C of G I doubt the wing stays stalled enough due to the foreward C of G envelope.

[SkySailor]

While working on my Commercial completion, I also had to deal with the 172's lack of desire to spin. I found it ironic that a student pilot had to spend more effort and education trying to spin it as opposed to recovering it. Perhaps this is a compliment to the fine engineers at Cessna. What started out as a lesson in spin recognition and recovery, always seemed to wind up being a demo in spiral dive recognition and recovery. It could get irritating after a while.

I suppose I found it irritating because during my Private, training was done on a Piper Tomahawk. When you were ready to spin, that great little trainer would take you on a magic carpet ride!!! No trying to figure out spin entry on that one. Piper, you built a bang-on little trainer.

[AEROBAT]

The Traumahawk got a bad rap because it would actually spin and lock in.

[AuxBatOn]

For most light trainers there is no part of the envelope that allows the pilot to turn back to the runway if the engine dies below ~1000 AGL. The 172 has a best glide of ~65 KIAS and a climbs out around 75 KIAS. There is no energy to zoom, the gear is down and welded, and the prop doesn't fx. Your best bet for survivial if you lose the engine on T/O is to hit the softest thing in front of you.

Allright, I ran some numbers, based on my old Cessna 150M manual. I assumed that the indicated airspeeds were TAS, that the aircraft was a MTOW and wind constant with altitude. Altitude lost in the turn assumed to be 200', everything flown at Vx (best rate).

With no wind on take off, and a 3000' runway, there is a very narrow window in which you could make it, with very little margin, between 210' and 250' AAE. Really, it's unrealistic in those conditions.

However, we add 10 kts headwind in take off and that window expands from 210' AAE to infinity, meaning that from that point, the climb angle exceeds the glide angle.

Now, for a 5000' runway and no wind, the window is now between 210' and 1300' AAE. Outside that, you are eighter too low to make the turn or you can't glide back after the turn.

So, with as little as a 10 kts headwind, you can be reasonably sure you can make it back.

[Big Pistons Forever]

Past the PPL, sure. It teaches the student to fly the airplane in its whole envelope and gives him 1 more thing that he can use in case shit hit the fan.

Here's a good example on a succesful one:

For most light trainers there is no part of the envelope that allows the pilot to turn back to the runway if the engine dies below ~1000 AGL. The 172 has a best glide of ~65 KIAS and a climbs out around 75 KIAS. There is no energy to zoom, the gear is down and welded, and the prop doesn't fx. Your best bet for survivial if you lose the engine on T/O is to hit the softest thing in front of you.

As for how to spin a 172, cgzro had it best. When you hear the stall warning go come back fully on the yoke and put in the rudder. It will spin, but it won't stay in past 3-4 rotations.

Spin entries in every aircraft I have flown work better if yaw is induced first and then the stick is brought briskly back to induce the stall.

[Big Pistons Forever]

A spin is a autorotation induced by yaw coupling, Auto meaning "self". If it comes out on it's own once control inputs are stopped full autorotation did not develop. In a 172 in utility C of G I doubt the wing stays stalled enough due to the foreward C of G envelope.

A fully developed spin occurs when the aircraft has settled into a stable rate of rotation and has a stable pitch attitude. Most airplanes take at least two rotation for this to occur. For the purpose of PPL and CPL training the distinction is meaningless as the point of the exercise is to first recognize the developing spin condition and recover and failing that, then if you are do inadvertantly let the aircraft continue into a spin again recognize and recover. If you let the aircraft achieve the fully developed spin condition than you are IMO missing the point of the exercise.

If you truely want to fully learn all aspects of how to enter and recover from spins than you should IMO do it as part of an aerobatic training program in an aerobatic airplane

[767]

Your best bet for survivial if you lose the engine on T/O is to hit the softest thing in front of you.

+1.

During EFTO at low altitude, there is no time to figure out about what energy state the airplane will turn back safely. I dont understand what this has to do with flying experience. When your way up there, there is plenty of time to decide where you want to land.

[hz2p]

.

[Big Pistons Forever]

For most light trainers there is no part of the envelope that allows the pilot to turn back to the runway if the engine dies below ~1000 AGL

Completely wrong. I have personally demonstrated the "impossible possible turn" - see Dave Roger's paper - many times, for real in a C172 with the throttle pulled at 500 feet AGL.

http://jeremy.zawodny.com/flying/turnback.pdf

Please don't confuse what the AIRCRAFT is aerodynamically capable, with what a particular, fumbling pilot randomly decides to sub-optimally do on any given day.

The ignorance here is astounding.

You would likely be surprised to learn what are the important factors in the turnback. But then again, no one here needs to learn anything because they know it all.

I dont understand what this has to do with flying experience

I really pity your students.


As far as spin entries go ... I guess none of the geniuses here have considered the rate of airspeed decrease?

Why do find it necessary to be so rude ?

Since this thread is about spinning perhaps if anyone wants to further discuss the turn back manoever, they should start a new thread

[MichaelP]

Four seat aircraft have to be controllable in a stall situation fully loaded and at a full aft CG position.
For this reason alone they are at a fwd CG position that is not helpful for spin entry in the utility category.

A fine example of this is the TB10 which is not easy to land power off with one or two persons on board. It runs out of pitch control and so they put a short nose leg on it!
For this aeroplane to be 'safe' at the stall with 454lbs on the back seat pitch authority has to be enough to stall and recover of course at the aft CG limit. This means compromising pitch authority when at the fwd limit.

Many aeroplanes are like this, for 182's, 206's, and Senecas as examples it's always advisable to put some weight in the rear when flying one or two up.

A Cessna 172 would spin if you could move the CG back.

A British trainer that the critical Barney might be refering to was the Beagle Pup 150. Provision was made to bolt weights onto the ventral fin for spin training.
In this way the three to four seat Pup 150 could still be spun when two up while without the weights the CG would allow for one or two (lightweight) people in the back.

The proof of the spin is in the airspeed.
If on the second turn the speed is still low and staying there, this is a true spin.
Those that claim that a Cessna 172 properly loaded in the Utility category can do 2 to 3 turns should look at the ASI to confirm this.

Yesterday we did indeed 'spin' the Cessna 172 C GCZN using 1800 RPM on entry and for one left turn.
One turn of this alleged spin is all that needs to be demonstrated for a CPL flight test.
I have done a lot of 'spinning' so to speak in the Cessna 172 and I am obviously not nearly as competent as Barney is or many on this forum because I look at the ASI and I see it increasing as the aeroplane I believe enters a spiral.
Indeed while still holding the control column all the way back and with full rudder applied I found that I could roll the aeroplane out of this 'spin' which is something I would normally do to flatten a true spin.

But, loaded to the aft CG limit the control authority is easily enough to spin the Cessna 172, and in this condition we need to be aware.
The aeroplane will not be as difficult to spin fully loaded and will catch you out very quickly.

Go fly a true spinning aeroplane for at least once in your career.

[AEROBAT]

I am surprised nobody ever brings up the Beggs/Mueller method of spin recovery. It is foolproof for a lot of aerobatic planes. There is no difference if you are inverted or upright.

[Tango01]

I am surprised nobody ever brings up the Beggs/Mueller method of spin recovery. It is foolproof for a lot of aerobatic planes. There is no difference if you are inverted or upright.

That's because its a spin entry thread. Once we settle the entry, we'll start the recovery discussion.

[AEROBAT]

I am surprised nobody ever brings up the Beggs/Mueller method of spin recovery. It is foolproof for a lot of aerobatic planes. There is no difference if you are inverted or upright.

That's because its a spin entry thread. Once we settle the entry, we'll start the recovery discussion.

Sorry.....