VMC vs. Weight
Moderators: Sulako, Right Seat Captain, lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia
VMC vs. Weight
hey guys ...
here is the question ...
How is the weight dose effect the VMC speed ..? and why ?
please guys i need a good explaination for my Multi Flight test.!
here is the question ...
How is the weight dose effect the VMC speed ..? and why ?
please guys i need a good explaination for my Multi Flight test.!
Re: VMC vs. Weight
Think about it,,, really think... you'll figure it out...
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
Re: VMC vs. Weight
That's quite some insight. I'm pretty sure he really thought about it, and so he came on here.Strega wrote:Think about it,,, really think... you'll figure it out...
Here's the answer, about 3/4 pagde down:
http://www.avweb.com/news/airman/184438-1.html
Re: VMC vs. Weight
I wrote that 14 years ago
I didn't know it was still around!
- FlaplessDork
- Rank 7

- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 9:50 am
- Location: British Columbia
Re: VMC vs. Weight
Basically its harder to move (Yaw) a heavier object.FAA Airplane Flying Handbook wrote:Most unfavorable weight and center-of-gravity
position. VMC increases as the center of gravity
is moved aft. The moment arm of the rudder is
reduced, and therefore its effectivity is reduced,
as the center of gravity is moved aft. At the same
time, the moment arm of the propeller blade is
increased, aggravating asymmetrical thrust.
Invariably, the aft-most CG limit is the most
unfavorable CG position. Currently, 14 CFR
part 23 calls for VMC to be determined at the
most unfavorable weight. For twins certificated
under CAR 3 or early 14 CFR part 23,
the weight at which VMC was determined was
not specified. VMC increases as weight is
reduced.
Re: VMC vs. Weight
Seriously, I have seen that document on more than one occasion. Good on you.Hedley wrote:I wrote that 14 years agoI didn't know it was still around!
-
floats4fun
- Rank 2

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:46 pm
Re: VMC vs. Weight
I believe it has to do with the heavier the aircraft, the more lift it has to generate to keep flying. The added lift (compared to a lighter a/c) is what (is said...Im not a engineer) to reduce VMC. I may be wrong..
-
iflyforpie
- Top Poster

- Posts: 8132
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: VMC vs. Weight
Yeah you did. You quoted it not too long ago.Hedley wrote:I wrote that 14 years agoI didn't know it was still around!
Excellent article!
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
-
Buzz Lightyear
- Rank 5

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:05 am
Re: VMC vs. Weight
And 14 years ago they already called you a veteran....ouch! 
Born to fly, forced to work
Re: VMC vs. Weight
When you're in the zero sideslip configuration, the higher weight promotes higher horizontal component of lift , giving you more authority and decreasing Vmc.
Re: VMC vs. Weight
Basically its about forces.
In the "test configuration" the aircraft is banked into the good engine 5 degrees or so. This generates a horizontal lift component. Since lift is greater with an increase in weight. The heavier the airplane the greater the horizontal force generated when you bank the airplane.
Since the horizontal force is going to pull the airplane into the good engine the demands on the rudder to maintain straight flight are decreased. So you can manage a lower speed and still keep the shiny side up. However! an increase in weight will lower VMC from a controlability point of view only. In light twins as weight increases so does the power loading. So you may be able to control the airplane but you may not have any performance to climbout.
In the "test configuration" the aircraft is banked into the good engine 5 degrees or so. This generates a horizontal lift component. Since lift is greater with an increase in weight. The heavier the airplane the greater the horizontal force generated when you bank the airplane.
Since the horizontal force is going to pull the airplane into the good engine the demands on the rudder to maintain straight flight are decreased. So you can manage a lower speed and still keep the shiny side up. However! an increase in weight will lower VMC from a controlability point of view only. In light twins as weight increases so does the power loading. So you may be able to control the airplane but you may not have any performance to climbout.
x15
Skin, Tin, Ticket...In that order.
Skin, Tin, Ticket...In that order.
Re: VMC vs. Weight
From the link above:
Those refer to the airplane loaded as lightly as you can (worse for VMC), yet with a pile of weight in the rear for the most aft C-of-G (again, worse for VMC). Hence, the airplane is not at BEW, but some higher value that gives the worst case scenario for both light weight, and most aft C-of-G.
Sometimes you will see the VMC test is done at Minimum Practical Weight or Minimum Test Weight.So, we can see that the angle of bank into the good engine in addition to affecting performance, most definitely affects Vmc. What else affects Vmc?
Well, the published Vmc figure is determined at maximum gross weight.
Those refer to the airplane loaded as lightly as you can (worse for VMC), yet with a pile of weight in the rear for the most aft C-of-G (again, worse for VMC). Hence, the airplane is not at BEW, but some higher value that gives the worst case scenario for both light weight, and most aft C-of-G.
-
TC Aviator
- Rank 1

- Posts: 38
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:17 am
- Location: Canada
Re: VMC vs. Weight
Dagwood is correct on this one.
Please read the bottom of Page 63 of AC 23-8B, Section 23-149 at the following link:
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_an ... ghlight=ac 23-8b
Please read the bottom of Page 63 of AC 23-8B, Section 23-149 at the following link:
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_an ... ghlight=ac 23-8b




