Amphib Otter crash-France
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Rudder Bug
Amphib Otter crash-France
Apparently the laws of physics apply in France as well!
http://www.aeroweb-fr.net/actualites/20 ... sur-le-lac
Interesting view of the bottom of the floats as the pax evacuate off the bottom surface of the wing!
http://www.aeroweb-fr.net/actualites/20 ... sur-le-lac
Interesting view of the bottom of the floats as the pax evacuate off the bottom surface of the wing!
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not after you!
- cdnpilot77
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: There are no new accidents.
I can't read in French, but seems the gear is in a curious position for landing on water...hmmm....must have been a former French Fighter pilot and the crappy Canadian Airframe not holding up that caused this one
-
- Rank Moderator
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
- Location: Straight outta Dundarave...
Re: There are no new accidents.
Mon Francais nest pas le meillure, but I think that this:
means that it wasn't the usual pilot, and that the accident had something to do with the landing gear position - as shown in the picture.La thèse la plus plausible est que les roulettes avant se soient enfoncées dans l'eau à l'amerrissage, entrainant le reste de l'avion. Il semblerait en outre que le propriétaire de l'avion était aux commandes de celui-ci et non le pilote habituel qui a opéré sur le site tout au long du week-end.
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:24 am
- Location: Drink in my hand, feet in the sand
Re: There are no new accidents.
I'm really suprised how high it floated upside down and how far it slid on the gear before flipping.
I disagree, it can only happen to a pilot that leaves the gear down, then lands on water.Use it to learn from, it could happen to anyone.
We're all here, because we're not all there.
Re: There are no new accidents.
Interesting how the main gear grabbed the water, but its the nose gear that pulled it tits over ass. I'm amazed how strong that nose gear is, I've often wondered if they could design a break away system that would shear off if jammed in the water like that, yet would be strong enough to handle the regular forces associated with paved runways.
Or just leave the gear up landing on the water, but that doesn't seem to be working well.
Or just leave the gear up landing on the water, but that doesn't seem to be working well.
No trees were harmed in the transmission of this message. However, a rather large number of electrons were temporarily inconvenienced.
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 7374
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:50 pm
- Location: Cowering in my little room because the Water Cooler is locked.
- Contact:
Re: There are no new accidents.
I'm used to seeing this video of a faster flip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6e3n1RYvsI
I think maybe if you have a bigger amphib, you have more time to contemplate your neglect before you get wet and upside down. Maybe it's got to do with all those force vector things I saw in From The Ground Up years ago.
Still, it's good no one was killed.
-istp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6e3n1RYvsI
I think maybe if you have a bigger amphib, you have more time to contemplate your neglect before you get wet and upside down. Maybe it's got to do with all those force vector things I saw in From The Ground Up years ago.
Still, it's good no one was killed.
-istp

-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:24 am
- Location: Drink in my hand, feet in the sand
Re: There are no new accidents.
I know of a beaver that landed gear down many years ago, and didn't flip. It's the only time I know of. Maybe there is more?
We're all here, because we're not all there.
- Pilot_king!
- Rank 1
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:26 pm
- Location: Western Canada
Re: There are no new accidents.
I have a pretty good bilingual tongue, and the quote earlier says
The planes front wheels caught the sea as the plane was landing. Tthe owner of the plane was flying and the not usual pilot as the plane crashed early into the long weekend.
The planes front wheels caught the sea as the plane was landing. Tthe owner of the plane was flying and the not usual pilot as the plane crashed early into the long weekend.
- Pilot_king!
- Rank 1
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:26 pm
- Location: Western Canada
Re: There are no new accidents.
After reading further into the article.
The pilot took off just a few minutes earlier from an airport just a few miles away.
No one was hurt except for one person who was airlifted for x-rays. The plane did sink to the bottom of the lake a few mins later. The plane is going to stay there until Agro Inc. can find away to bring it to the surface.
One less Swotter flying.
The pilot took off just a few minutes earlier from an airport just a few miles away.
No one was hurt except for one person who was airlifted for x-rays. The plane did sink to the bottom of the lake a few mins later. The plane is going to stay there until Agro Inc. can find away to bring it to the surface.
One less Swotter flying.
Last edited by Pilot_king! on Thu May 20, 2010 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 8133
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: There are no new accidents.
Looks like a swotter to me...Pilot_king! wrote: One less Twotter flying.
Me too. Fat wings full of air? I would imagine the volume is comparable to the floats.mag check wrote:I'm really suprised how high it floated upside down
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 8:05 pm
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
Ive always wondered how much having that revenue seat beside the pilot may play. Yes its still a stupid mistake and pilot shouldnt be distracted but you know how those passengers up front are.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:24 am
- Location: Drink in my hand, feet in the sand
Re: There are no new accidents.
I guess with the inspection panels on the underside of the wings, and the slow roll over not causing much damage, plus the fact it was nose low, keeping the trailing edge out, kept it up.iflyforpie wrote:Looks like a swotter to me...Pilot_king! wrote: One less Twotter flying.
Me too. Fat wings full of air? I would imagine the volume is comparable to the floats.mag check wrote:I'm really suprised how high it floated upside down
Even still I was suprised, I would have guessed that it would settle upto mid fuselage.
We're all here, because we're not all there.
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
An interesting vid to watch in the context of that raging discussion a couple of weeks back about whether to force into trees or water.
Water ain't pretty, but you're never going to be impaled, subjected to blunt force trauma, or burned going into water. Except in the mythical version of what it would be like, in which you still haven't gotten the doors open as you sink past 20 fathoms within 2.5 seconds of hitting the water. This is a good example of what really happens in a water landing. It's even less of a problem with a retractable.
Water ain't pretty, but you're never going to be impaled, subjected to blunt force trauma, or burned going into water. Except in the mythical version of what it would be like, in which you still haven't gotten the doors open as you sink past 20 fathoms within 2.5 seconds of hitting the water. This is a good example of what really happens in a water landing. It's even less of a problem with a retractable.
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
Don't worry she'll fly again, they have lots of parts, and most importantly a dataplate
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
Question to those who have the answer...
In that situation, could anything have been done to get everybody out, close the doors, and try and right that thing?
In that situation, could anything have been done to get everybody out, close the doors, and try and right that thing?
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
sad think that happened here ...
I believe something should be done on the amphibious airplanes ... i mean we should devise a way that the wheels lock inside the floats after a certain pitch after landing on water. Wheels out shouldn't make the whole airplane flip afterall ... (we're in 2010 by the way ...)
i agree this white otter looked pretty clean
I believe something should be done on the amphibious airplanes ... i mean we should devise a way that the wheels lock inside the floats after a certain pitch after landing on water. Wheels out shouldn't make the whole airplane flip afterall ... (we're in 2010 by the way ...)
i agree this white otter looked pretty clean
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:13 am
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
I believe a good fix would be to install an arm complete with a boxing glove,,spring loaded to hit the pilot on the side of the head IF the LG is down and the hydro-radar altimeter picks up water below with the throttles retarded !! Another tool would be a hand , arranged to slap the co-pilot on the cheek IN ADVANCE of the boxing glove hit to the pilot !! A third option would be a "squirter" which fills the crews pants full of water,, simulating a water landing with the wheels down !! Which one should i patent ?
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
Ogee wrote:Question to those who have the answer...
In that situation, could anything have been done to get everybody out, close the doors, and try and right that thing?
Uhh NO!
Re: There are no new accidents.
Hey 77... did your mother have any children that don't ride the short bus?cdnpilot77 wrote:....must have been a former French Fighter pilot and the crappy Canadian Airframe not holding up that caused this one
WTF are you talking about?
Don't Let the Same Dog Bite You Twice - . Berry
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:24 am
- Location: Drink in my hand, feet in the sand
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
Sure there is, but it would depend on having the proper equipment there at the time.rigpiggy wrote:Ogee wrote:Question to those who have the answer...
In that situation, could anything have been done to get everybody out, close the doors, and try and right that thing?
Uhh NO!
It is not too difficult to flip it back over, but not much time before it goes down.
We're all here, because we're not all there.
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
This is a perfect example of why pilots will never hit the ranks of 'professionals.' We will be extinct long before that happens.
"What's it doing now?"
"Fly low and slow and throttle back in the turns."
"Fly low and slow and throttle back in the turns."
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:19 pm
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
This is a terrible incident, I am very glad that no one got seriously hurt! (at least by how it appears on the video)
I believe that in Jack Schofields book “Flights of a coast dog" he makes mention of a pilot who landed a single otter with its wheels down on water twice. Luckily the C of G was aft enough that it pitched forward and thrashed the prop in the water but did not flip over. The pilot was given a second chance after the 1st incident but was canned after the second.
What I don’t understand is how this nonsense keeps happening? I flew a beaver on wipline amphibs and as soon as you slowed down below a certain speed (80 KIAS I believe) the airplane would tell you either a: "Gear is up for water landing" Or b: "The gear is down for runway landing". I think the water landing voice was male and the runway landing was female, I cant remember exactly it has been ages! And of course there were the lights that would be either blue for water landings, green for down and locked or red for in transit.
Beyond that there where mirrors positioned all over the airplane so you could see what position the gear was in. I think that this is enough safety features to keep a pilot from landing with his gear in the wrong position. Add in a thorough pre landing check that is not "parroted" as quickly as humanly possible and there is no excuse for landing with your gear in the wrong position.
I believe that in Jack Schofields book “Flights of a coast dog" he makes mention of a pilot who landed a single otter with its wheels down on water twice. Luckily the C of G was aft enough that it pitched forward and thrashed the prop in the water but did not flip over. The pilot was given a second chance after the 1st incident but was canned after the second.
What I don’t understand is how this nonsense keeps happening? I flew a beaver on wipline amphibs and as soon as you slowed down below a certain speed (80 KIAS I believe) the airplane would tell you either a: "Gear is up for water landing" Or b: "The gear is down for runway landing". I think the water landing voice was male and the runway landing was female, I cant remember exactly it has been ages! And of course there were the lights that would be either blue for water landings, green for down and locked or red for in transit.
Beyond that there where mirrors positioned all over the airplane so you could see what position the gear was in. I think that this is enough safety features to keep a pilot from landing with his gear in the wrong position. Add in a thorough pre landing check that is not "parroted" as quickly as humanly possible and there is no excuse for landing with your gear in the wrong position.
c_172pilot
Aviation is proof, that given the will,
we have the capacity to achieve the impossible."
Aviation is proof, that given the will,
we have the capacity to achieve the impossible."
Re: Amphib Otter crash-France
Mods,
Is there a particular reason the title of this thread got changed? I have no gripe with the current title but I didn't think the original one was all that inflamatory or contentious!
Is there a particular reason the title of this thread got changed? I have no gripe with the current title but I didn't think the original one was all that inflamatory or contentious!
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not after you!