Interesting diversion for Porter last night

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
tedcuthbert
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:37 am

Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by tedcuthbert »

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/POE1 ... /KEWR/CYOW

Should have diverted to YYZ (poor viz, low ceilings at YTZ). Toronto star said YYZ was unable to take them due to G20 traffic, so they went to Ottawa?? (I'm sure the passengers were not pleased) Must have been getting short of fuel at the end? Would they plan fuel for a diversion that far away?
---------- ADS -----------
 
YYZatcboy
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:12 pm
Location: CYYC

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by YYZatcboy »

Yes, If a diversion looked possible, SOCC would look at all the suitable diversion airports. They would know that YYZ was going to have the G 20, and YHM was likely below Alternate minimums, so they would send them to YOW. The flight was likely weight restricted for the extra fuel, and in all likelihood the passengers would have been advised before they boarded that the flight might have to divert to YOW.

That's how I think it went down.
---------- ADS -----------
 
midwingcrisis
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:54 pm

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by midwingcrisis »

Appears they may have been in the vicinity of CYTZ attempting approach(s) even after "official" closing time. The Com Air gang would have been all over this one.
---------- ADS -----------
 
How do you go 205 kts TAS on 32 gal/hr without turbos!
CanterburyTail
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: CYTZ

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by CanterburyTail »

midwingcrisis wrote:Appears they may have been in the vicinity of CYTZ attempting approach(s) even after "official" closing time. The Com Air gang would have been all over this one.
YTZ closes at 11 at night. They were down in Ottawa before 12 so wouldn't have arrived after closing time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
AuxBatOn
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3283
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:13 pm
Location: North America, sometimes

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by AuxBatOn »

midwingcrisis wrote:Appears they may have been in the vicinity of CYTZ attempting approach(s) even after "official" closing time. The Com Air gang would have been all over this one.
According to the FlightAware Log, they overshot for the last time from YTZ @ 1057PM. Maybe you should research before you post...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Going for the deck at corner
niss
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: I'm a CPL trapped in a PPL's Body.
Contact:

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by niss »

AuxBatOn wrote:
midwingcrisis wrote: Maybe you should research before you post...
Meeeeeooowwwww......

Image

You've been kind of irritable lately.
---------- ADS -----------
 
She’s built like a Steakhouse, but she handles like a Bistro.

Let's kick the tires, and light the fires.... SHIT! FIRE! EMERGENCY CHECKLIST!
User avatar
invertedattitude
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2353
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:12 pm

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by invertedattitude »

Porter also had a diversion from YHZ as well due to weather...
---------- ADS -----------
 
EastCoaster
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:39 am

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by EastCoaster »

So what's your issue then??? Last overshoot at 2257, airport closes at 2300. Am I missing something here or is this just another mud slinging crap post. Other airlines routinely land right at the time of closing at many airports across this country and others..... Of course they had fuel on board for their alternate in YOW. They may not be your favourite airline, but they do encompass a group of seasoned airline folks. Their alternate requirements would be the same as those of AC, WS, and the rest of the gang. I don't even work within 2000 miles of Porter or Toronto, but I'm just tired of this armchair quarterback bullsh!t crap. They aren't going to endanger the lives of a load of passengers by not carrying more than enough fuel.
---------- ADS -----------
 
midwingcrisis
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:54 pm

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by midwingcrisis »

....yes according to "Flightaware post log info", you are correct. My general point was that the folks over at CA have many "algorithms" for curfew violations. Remember, they do not want the airport..period. Looks like the weather was crazy there last night. I think the passengers would understand.
---------- ADS -----------
 
How do you go 205 kts TAS on 32 gal/hr without turbos!
User avatar
Hawkerflyer
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 2:50 pm
Location: Here today, gone tomorrow

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by Hawkerflyer »

Slow day in aviation fellas? Who cares.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Six of us broke formation, five Jerries and I". - George "Buzz" Beurling
CanterburyTail
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: CYTZ

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by CanterburyTail »

midwingcrisis wrote:....yes according to "Flightaware post log info", you are correct. My general point was that the folks over at CA have many "algorithms" for curfew violations. Remember, they do not want the airport..period. Looks like the weather was crazy there last night. I think the passengers would understand.
Yeah well the Community Air folks are losing a lot of support. With the addition of all those shiny new condos, most people now want the airport.
---------- ADS -----------
 
OceansEdge
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:17 pm

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by OceansEdge »

midwingcrisis wrote:....yes according to "Flightaware post log info", you are correct. My general point was that the folks over at CA have many "algorithms" for curfew violations. Remember, they do not want the airport..period. Looks like the weather was crazy there last night. I think the passengers would understand.
So use the weather as an 'excuse' to miss and not land to appease a community group that doesn't want them.... that's a truly sound business model :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
EastCoaster
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:39 am

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by EastCoaster »

No,

That's not the business model or the case. They tried the approach, would have landed prior to curfew or within the grace period, and missed the approach so then, much like airplanes trying to get into any other airport with crap wxx, they diverted to a suitable alternate.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Main Gear
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:48 am
Location: Earth

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by Main Gear »

This has to be one of the stupidest treads of the year...my vote. Am I missing something? Isn't this just a normal part of operating an airline? Sounds like just another day at the office.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Never point your aircraft to some place your brain hasn't already been 5 minutes earlier.
ng78
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:48 pm

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by ng78 »

Oh no! Porter diverted to their legal alternate due to weather, for which they were carrying enough fuel? Oh dear!

C'mon, this is an aviation forum, I expect better than this.
---------- ADS -----------
 
tedcuthbert
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:37 am

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by tedcuthbert »

YYZatcboy, thanks for the response, that makes sense. Sorry, I didn't mean to stir the pot. I fly privately & VFR only, so am a bit behind the curve on airline opp's so I thought it an odd diversion (particularly since it was mentioned in the media) and their normal alternates have been YYZ and YHM. But now that I think of it, Ottawa would be the best "second alternate" as they have customs, and is a regular Porter destination. Also, I forgot to mention an "Air Bravo" flight from Muskoka diverted from YTZ to YYZ at about the same time and they were able to land, so didn't see why Porter could'nt, though I now understand that was because they were likely a medivac flight.
---------- ADS -----------
 
OceansEdge
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:17 pm

Re: Interesting diversion for Porter last night

Post by OceansEdge »

EastCoaster wrote:No,
That's not the business model or the case. They tried the approach, would have landed prior to curfew or within the grace period, and missed the approach so then, much like airplanes trying to get into any other airport with crap wxx, they diverted to a suitable alternate.
Main Gear wrote:This has to be one of the stupidest treads of the year...my vote. Am I missing something? Isn't this just a normal part of operating an airline? Sounds like just another day at the office.
Sorry - yes, I was being facetious

I had just finished explaining all this to a friend who's flight was diverted back to Pittsburg...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”