Jazz Ratification Vote.

Discuss topics relating to Jazz Aviation LP.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

flyinhigh
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3135
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: my couch

Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by flyinhigh »

Well folks, just thought that I would start a new thread.

Our results are in on out TZ Agreement Vote.

Of the eligible pilots able to vote we had a 90% voters turn out, with an astounding turn out of just shy of 86% in Favor.

Good for me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
moreccsplease
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by moreccsplease »

Good for me, good for the pilot group, good for all professional pilots in Canadian aviation.

We now have a good contract that ALPA and Jazz Air LP can both take ownership of.

This pilot group forges ahead, unified.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
moreccsplease
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by moreccsplease »

Some highlights of the Agreement:


- Total of $131,000,000 additional dollars will be spent by Jazz on Pilot wages, benefits and expenses over the next five years, an average of $26,000,000 per year.

- Complete Pilot payroll including wages, benefits and expenses will rise from an annual level of approximately $125,000,000 today to approximately $153,000,000 after July 1, 2014. This equates to a 22.4% increase.

- The total dollar breakdown is $58,000,000 in additional wages, $29,000,000 in additional pension funding, $19,000,000 toward reduction of pilot benefit premiums, $14,000,000 in additional non-taxable expense payments and finally $11,000,000 toward various allowances.


Other improvements include:


- All pilots, including Reserve block holders, will receive a minimum of the blocking average for their roster each month.

- Fatigue Units will now be applied to each duty period, maximum of 19. Example, a 12 hour duty period could have a maximum of 7 landings.

- Overnights away from base minimum rest period increased to 11 hours.

- Maximum Reserve aggregate time reduced from 22 hours to 20 hours.

- Training outside the window eliminated with the exception of one day a year for home-based recurrent ground school.

- Significant increases for involuntary move allowances and expenses.


Plus many other improvements all over the contract. A complete re-write, word for word -- comma for comma, on all 195 pages of this contract was done.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ng78
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:48 pm

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by ng78 »

That's excellent news, congratulations to the Jazz pilots! Any word on what the pay scale will be with the new agreement?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
V1 Rotate
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: Fragrant Harbour

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by V1 Rotate »

Progress! You gotta love it.

Well done Jazz.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"I have control!"
User avatar
Chuck Yeagermister
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:11 pm
Location: YYZ

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Chuck Yeagermister »

Yes Congrats. We had NO other option.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Dark Helmet
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:59 pm

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Dark Helmet »

. Yeagermister wrote:Yes Congrats. We had NO other option.
Actually we did have another option. Just do happens it was not going to be a better option that what we got.
---------- ADS -----------
 
VicMackey
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:08 pm

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by VicMackey »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Brick Head
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:37 pm

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Brick Head »

moreccsplease wrote:
Total of $131,000,000 additional dollars will be spent by Jazz on Pilot wages, benefits and expenses over the next five years, an average of $26,000,000 per year.
26 million per year divided by 1500 pilots is a $17,333 increase per pilot per year. Or about $86,000 per pilot over 5 years.

That is absolutely impressive.

Since I am always skeptical of numbers thrown at me. It is healthy to be so I think.

Does that sound reasonable based on what you heard at the road shows? To be clear I am not calling BS or anything. Just would like to know from the troops if in their mind that number makes sense for corroboration. Costing things out can be very subjective.

So you know my motivation.

ME TOO PLEASE!
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyinhigh
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3135
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: my couch

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by flyinhigh »

I can't believe someone posted this on Airline Pay before the contract was even Ratified.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Squid
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:35 pm
Location: Timmins

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Squid »

Still not much cash for the regular old pay :?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4858
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Bede »

Squid wrote:Still not much cash for the regular old pay :?
That is a good thing. Regular old pay is taxed highly, per diems, etc. are not. Congrats on a great contract.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
moreccsplease
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by moreccsplease »

Brick Head wrote:
moreccsplease wrote:
Total of $131,000,000 additional dollars will be spent by Jazz on Pilot wages, benefits and expenses over the next five years, an average of $26,000,000 per year.
26 million per year divided by 1500 pilots is a $17,333 increase per pilot per year. Or about $86,000 per pilot over 5 years.

That is absolutely impressive.

Since I am always skeptical of numbers thrown at me. It is healthy to be so I think.

Does that sound reasonable based on what you heard at the road shows? To be clear I am not calling BS or anything. Just would like to know from the troops if in their mind that number makes sense for corroboration. Costing things out can be very subjective.

So you know my motivation.

ME TOO PLEASE!
Hi Brick Head,

These numbers are what Jazz said this deal would cost when it was sent out for ratification. ALPA costed the deal out as well to see if these numbers Jazz were using were factual, and on the roadshows ALPA said they agree that the numbers are very close.

One more thing to take into account with that, is that First Officers are getting the best deal here as roughly 57% of all gains are going to First Officers in some way, shape, or form. This was one of the Pilot group's top priorities, to re-balance the First Officer side of things, junior and senior. Our guys definitely looked out for their young, I gotta say.

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Localizer
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:18 pm
Location: CYYZ

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Localizer »

Squid wrote:Still not much cash for the regular old pay
The point of the contract was to get overall increases .. but where possible increase the net pay over the gross pay. Hence keep the governments hands out of our money. Its a good contract going forward .. it also takes care of some big ticket items and frees our bargaining power up on the next go. (ie. Never have to worry about the pension again)

Cheers, Loc
---------- ADS -----------
 
OceansEdge
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:17 pm

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by OceansEdge »

Congratulations - looks like a fairly solid deal - good on everyone
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Dark Helmet
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:59 pm

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Dark Helmet »

The pay scale and the perdiems are accurate on Airline Pilot Central.

Keep in mind that the numbers on the payscale and the perdiems will go up 2% on July 01 of every year for the duration of the CA.

On top of that,

The pay rates will be adjusted annualy to reflect fleet composition. For example, they will be adjusted next year when the 757's arrive.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
vortac
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: 108.10 to 117.9

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by vortac »

soooooo...Let me get this straight

A new hire Jazz FO now makes more than a new hire AC mainline FO?
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyinhigh
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3135
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: my couch

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by flyinhigh »

According to what we saw that is correct.

Yes the pay goes up 2% per year but that is for captains. Fos
Go up faster, I believe it is 4% till year 5, than 5% to the end, topping out now at $75 not the 68 shown on that airline pay site.

Also when you look at that site you now cap out as a F/O in 11 years not the previously 16 years.
---------- ADS -----------
 
teacher
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2450
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:25 pm

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by teacher »

............and many other non taxable allowances and expenses that are not listed, a big uplift in per diem (already mentioned) and other quality of life improvements. Overall a good contract which could have been better without government interference.
---------- ADS -----------
 
https://eresonatemedia.com/
https://bambaits.ca/
https://youtube.com/channel/UCWit8N8YCJSvSaiSw5EWWeQ
El Comat
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:01 pm
Location: Sudbury

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by El Comat »

With the yearly 2% inflationary raise plus my yearly jump up the pay scale, I'll get about 6% more base salary every year for the duration of this collective agreement. Add that to the non-taxable benefits, and I'm looking at about 15-22% more IN MY POCKET and the end of the day. Plus my pension got a MASSIVE uplift, as long as it's there in 33-38 years when I need it!

EC
---------- ADS -----------
 
whiteguy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1059
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: YYC

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by whiteguy »

vortac wrote:soooooo...Let me get this straight

A new hire Jazz FO now makes more than a new hire AC mainline FO?

And a new hire WJ pilot make's more than a new hire AC FO!

Separate companies, why are you surprised?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Dark Helmet
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:59 pm

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Dark Helmet »

flyinhigh wrote:According to what we saw that is correct.

Yes the pay goes up 2% per year but that is for captains. Fos
Go up faster, I believe it is 4% till year 5, than 5% to the end, topping out now at $75 not the 68 shown on that airline pay site.

Also when you look at that site you now cap out as a F/O in 11 years not the previously 16 years.
Just for Clarification,

There is the YOS (Year of Service) pay rates increases that each pilot will receive on their DOH day.

The YOS for CAPTS is 2%/year until the top of the scale at 16 years (17 years in 2015)

FO"S Year 1,2,3 is 2% then it jumps to 4% on years 4,5,6,and 7, and then 2.5% for years 8,9,10,and 11. With 11 years being the top of the FO scale.(12 in 2015)

There is also an annual 2% pay uplift on July 1st of every year that every pilot will receive.

For example,

If the company decides to hire on July 19th again, These pilots would start at $40.00/hr (Note: there is no longer a flat pay rate for years 1 and 2. Everyone gets the hourly wage guaranteed to the blocking average for the month to a minimum of 77.5 hours.)

On July 1 2011, these pilots would get a raise to $41.20 (2011 pay rates). On July 19th, 2011 these pilots would move up to $46.35 (YOS 2 payscale for 2011), and so on...

Probably more than what you needed to know.

DH
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Samson
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Van City

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Samson »

Bede wrote:
Squid wrote:Still not much cash for the regular old pay :?
That is a good thing. Regular old pay is taxed highly, per diems, etc. are not. Congrats on a great contract.
Most people on here will agree per diems are not pay but are there to reimburse personal expenses. But if you are getting $78 a day many are going to pocket a good chunk of that. What are the legalities of paying employees this way? Obviously Jazz can save a ton of money paying very low regular pay while employees survive on non-taxable income. $40 a flight hour is still shockingly low for someone with as much experience as most new-hires at Jazz have.

Would there be anything stopping a company from paying $1 per flight hour and $200 a day per diems? Are there laws limiting per diems?
---------- ADS -----------
 
mbav8r
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Manitoba

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by mbav8r »

Our new per diems are slightly less than the federal gov daily per diem rate. The gov sets the rate every 6 months based on 3 meals a day(healthy meals) Try and eat three healthy meals on less. At the end of the contract our per diems will be what the current gov rate is, hopefully meals won't have doubled by then. I imagine if you were to pay more than their daily rate you might have to justify it, like try buying a meal in Rankin vs Winnipeg.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Stand-by, I'm inverted"
User avatar
Samson
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Van City

Re: Jazz Ratification Vote.

Post by Samson »

Ah, ok thanks. I guess they won't be able to pocket that much.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Jazz Aviation LP - Air Canada Express”