757 for Hawaii?

Discuss topics relating to Westjet.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

skyhigh
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:25 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by skyhigh »

Hi Mikeecho, the A/C that was supposed to be doing hawaii flying is being redeployed to new routes. So what happens to these routes after nine weeks?
---------- ADS -----------
 
mikeecho
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:31 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by mikeecho »

skyhigh wrote:Hi Mikeecho, the A/C that was supposed to be doing hawaii flying is being redeployed to new routes. So what happens to these routes after nine weeks?
The Hawaii flying was designed to maximize a/c utilization for a new aircraft delivery in February through the start of the summer schedule in April, so I would assume the aircraft in question would be built into the summer schedule as per normal at the end of the 9 weeks.

In the old days, the timing of the new aircraft delivery before the summer sked created extra sections between YYC-YYZ, YVR-YYZ, etc... Last year it was AB-Hawaii.
---------- ADS -----------
 
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5621
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by North Shore »

Anyone know the name of the leasing company?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
User avatar
invertedattitude
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2353
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:12 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by invertedattitude »

A quick search has shown "Air Finland" as offering 2 757-200's available for lease as of a couple months back?
---------- ADS -----------
 
biffnaked
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:04 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by biffnaked »

Well, we will see where this goes. I (and many others) will be mighty pissed if this is a reacharound...

We\'ll know this time next year.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JestWet
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:29 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by JestWet »

skyhigh wrote:Only gripe I have with this is that we are Wet Leasing in a year in which we are deferring an A/C delivery. I know it sounds short sighted and self-fish but thats how I feel about it.
Skyhigh, I'm with you. We're delaying our own deliveries only to take on a larger aircraft with more capacity - which is being crewed by another airline. ... Goodbye upgrade
---------- ADS -----------
 
mattedfred
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1502
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by mattedfred »

does the WJPA agreement include scope language?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mach75
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 6:14 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by Mach75 »

... goodbye westjettitude
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightlevels
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 7:16 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by Flightlevels »

You guys crack me up. Scope language! Delay in upgrade and westjettitude!
That is a clear lack of understanding of what is going on and where we sit with this flying. Should have went to a town hall or better yet give one of the wjpa a call. We have 45 new tails on order, we have retirements around the corner, we have block growth and efficiencies to utilize and one of the highest if not the highest fo pay scales out there. Second to none scheduling and shift trading, progressive port enhancing the list goes on. As my old retired friend Tony says. Apples and oranges. (I know you are still lurking Tony) Ya pretty tough place. :P I've semi retired too!
---------- ADS -----------
 
mattedfred
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1502
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by mattedfred »

easy texas

it was just a question

try not to read it in a tone that was not intended
---------- ADS -----------
 
JestWet
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:29 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by JestWet »

Flightlevels wrote:Ya pretty tough place. I've semi retired too!
Easy comment to make when you're already sitting in the left seat, halfway up the captain's payscale.
Retirements were figured into our expansion plans long ago, delaying airplanes and replacing them with a larger capacity one being crewed from outside the company was not.
Delaying 3 additional airplanes for the next few years will slow upgrades & hiring - there is no other way to look at it. It will adversely affect anyone currently sitting in the right seat, and anyone hoping to get hired on in the future.
Things are good here; the port, the pay, the shift trades, etc.
My "westjettitude" isn't suffering yet but if this turns out to be a year-after-year, on-going wet-lease that further delays our own expansion, I think it might start to eat away at morale and our culture.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bcflyer
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1357
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Canada

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by bcflyer »

Just out of curiousity, how many days do you guys work every month? I realize it can vary depending on the season etc but what would be an average?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightlevels
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 703
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 7:16 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by Flightlevels »

I can see your concerns, however retirements weren't planned into the growth and upgrades. Where you got that info from isn't accurate. I can only assume you are assuming that. We can't tell the finical health of each pilot. Some will finish late some will early. We don't have the drop dead date like ac(for now).
you have to remember that the airplanes were spread out more for the soft economy not because of this wet lease. Put it this way we are not losing any 737 flying. We will deploy them elsewhere. This wet lease flying is stuff we couldn't do in the first place(profitably) We aren't big enough yet to support a second type economically on our own. We can test the waters and use partners for now. It's better than going through a downsize isn't it? It's smart business period. Take a good look around the industry. Take the time to go sit in with informed people. Trust me you want a heathy strong company. It's way too easy to say I need to drive it. It just doesn't make sense for us "yet" patience grasshopper.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Manicoti
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:47 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by Manicoti »

Boy, some of you guys sound like you've come from a previous bad marriage......Leave the baggage at the door!

I've been here over 7 years and if you have an example of where Westjet tried to "screw" us, i'd like to hear about it. I won't hold my breath.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rotten Apple #1
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 915
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:34 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by Rotten Apple #1 »

The fact that the CEO of your company has taken the time to sit down with the pilot group both in 'town halls' and ground school settings (and for as long as required) to get the pulse of the pilot group, should set anyone's mind at ease as regards the culture at WJ. GS is simply too smart to blow the culture thing. No one ordered airplanes to upgrade pilots; planes were ordered to execute a business plan.

And that might be an easy comment for me to make as well, considering I'm up the list on the left side of the airplane. I'll spare you the rundown on the three airlines I worked for that aren't here anymore and the effect that had on what I thought was entitled to.

Pick yourself up by your boot straps and go do the work you were hired to do and one day you'll look back and wonder what the fuss was all about. Or go talk to the SSV pilot I just flew with who was my captain back at C3 and see what his expectations were.

That is all.

(PS: smile, tomorrow's payday)
---------- ADS -----------
 
biffnaked
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:04 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by biffnaked »

Things are good at WJ, most will agree. And most will agree that 9 weeks ain't a big deal. I'm just wondering what the end game is. AC is starting their AB-HI flights in Nov, why aren't we worried about them during this time?

Why only the 9 weeks in Feb-Mar? Sure it's spring break time and lots of money to be made but they will be stealing our yvr thrus for two months, AND over the Xmas holidays, aren't we worried about that? Something fishy, that's all. The execs are very good salesman, you wrap it up in a "Big Bad Air Canada" wrapper and it's like Clive all over again, the sure way to get WJers on side is to play the AC bogeyman game. Don't think for a minute that the townhalls weren't very carefully crafted sales jobs.

AC will fight us, and they can afford to hammer us on other routes because they don't care about losing money in the markets we compete on, they will just make it up on the INTL stuff.

I'd hate to see us expand this to other routes just as a way to get sexy flying. Yeah, try it out, but don't come back to us next year asking for 5 planes to do yvr-mbj, ab-hi, etc etc.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Donald
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Canada

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by Donald »

biffnaked wrote:AC will fight us, and they can afford to hammer us on other routes because they don't care about losing money in the markets we compete on, they will just make it up on the INTL stuff.
Don't kid yourself into believing that WJ doesn't do the exact same thing!
---------- ADS -----------
 
WJ200
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by WJ200 »

Reacharound....upgrades screwed.....seriously guys. When you came to WestJet did you expect it to be just like another airline. The airline doesn't exist just so you have a place to go for half the month. It exists to make money and to outlast the competition. When you came did you think that management had a vested interest in screwing the employees? If that was the case you should have gone somewhere that it actually does. Gregg didn't even have to come to the pilots to address this issue. Does that sound like someone out to screw the pilots? Also keep things in perspective....it's NINE weeks.....108 FLIGHTS!!! We do 400+ departures per day!! Conspriacy theories don't exist at WestJet nor do we have time for them.....
---------- ADS -----------
 
FOX69
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:06 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by FOX69 »

The type of WJ pilot who stomps his feet and complains that his "career progression" is being interrupted is the type who has some false ideas about how the aviation business works. I made 737 skip before 40, and I consider that extremely lucky. Or should I complain that 911 slowed down my career progression? I don't think anyone would listen. If I never have to suffer through another downgrade, layoff, or bankruptcy, I'll consider myself very very lucky.

We must be vigilant about this wet lease business, but not over dramatic. When I was hired, it was explained that "we do things a little differently here, we work with the company, not against it."

Remember, it's better to be an FO at WJ than a Capt at Jazz.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JestWet
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:29 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by JestWet »

I'm not too worried about my own personal "career progression". More concerned about what it may do to morale.

For what its worth, I wouldn't exactly say that I'm "stomping my feet" either, as you so eloquently put it. Just trying to be cautious about how this may affect culture in the future.

Time will tell.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Westbeach
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:58 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by Westbeach »

JestWet..you're worried about how it may affect culture in the future? Well you are doing a real good job at getting things going. It is selfish guys on the line like you that give the group a bad name.. Do what you have been hired to do, and let the people in the office do what they need to do. As much as your selfish educated self might think that there is no plan and this is a big bend over the pilot thing, someone with an education and all sorts of data has decided this is what needs to be done and it is going to happen. The fact that you are concerned about your precious upgrade before the interests of the other 7899 employees you work with blows my mind. You obviously slipped thru the cracks. It is guys like you that will kill our amazing culture before any decision the guys on the 5th floor do. Give your head a shake you bum.
---------- ADS -----------
 
beast
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by beast »

JestWet..you're worried about how it may affect culture in the future? Well you are doing a real good job at getting things going. It is selfish guys on the line like you that give the group a bad name.. Do what you have been hired to do, and let the people in the office do what they need to do. As much as your selfish educated self might think that there is no plan and this is a big bend over the pilot thing, someone with an education and all sorts of data has decided this is what needs to be done and it is going to happen. The fact that you are concerned about your precious upgrade before the interests of the other 7899 employees you work with blows my mind. You obviously slipped thru the cracks. It is guys like you that will kill our amazing culture before any decision the guys on the 5th floor do. Give your head a shake you bum.
Wow. The westjet miracle in action.....time to down some more koolaid guys...
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
KAG
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by KAG »

Both sides of this argument have valid points, Here's where I sit -The short term lease is a good thing. As it's been pointed out it's only for 9 weeks. In that 9 weeks we have have valuable data to gather/crunch and to fight off AC in our backyard. All the while doing it at minimal cost.
In any other company this would be the "slippery slope" (wet lease) but I don't think thats the case here. It may well last for a few years untill it's been proven that we can use those heavies year round at a profit, and then MAYBE we'll buy our own.

I would rather our company take this conservative approach, rather then bet the house and try to take over the world.
And if that means holding up my upgrade for a bit, then so be it. I really don't want to have to start over.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The feet you step on today might be attached to the ass you're kissing tomorrow.
Chase lifestyle not metal.
Manicoti
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:47 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by Manicoti »

beast wrote:
JestWet..you're worried about how it may affect culture in the future? Well you are doing a real good job at getting things going. It is selfish guys on the line like you that give the group a bad name.. Do what you have been hired to do, and let the people in the office do what they need to do. As much as your selfish educated self might think that there is no plan and this is a big bend over the pilot thing, someone with an education and all sorts of data has decided this is what needs to be done and it is going to happen. The fact that you are concerned about your precious upgrade before the interests of the other 7899 employees you work with blows my mind. You obviously slipped thru the cracks. It is guys like you that will kill our amazing culture before any decision the guys on the 5th floor do. Give your head a shake you bum.
Wow. The westjet miracle in action.....time to down some more koolaid guys...
Hmm, i wonder which airline you work for?
It's not about drinking coolaid buddy, it's called being "professional" and acting like one! If having pride in what I do and having great work ethics is called drinking cool aid then........BURP!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
JestWet
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:29 am

Re: 757 for Hawaii?

Post by JestWet »

Westbeach ... wow.
Re-read my posts please. I didn't think they were "over the top" negative comments when I was writing them, maybe I'm wrong. That certainly wasn't my intent anyways. Nice response though - way to keep it as a professional debate.

And I'm the one who slipped through the cracks?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “WestJet”