That's how it works everywhere not just for mideast dictators. If the US reinstated slavery and bombed Mexico the world would than push for regime change there too.
Dash-ate, you have a very selfish and self centered view on the world. It's a good thing the majority of world citizens don't think like you. What you fail to realize is that you may want to defend only yourself BUT it's easier to defend yourself and your interests early and before things get out of hand. Are you the type of person to watch your neighbours house burn down with hose in hand waiting but not helping just incase the fire spreads to your house?
Peace unfortunatly in many parts of the world will only arrive at the end of a gun. Dictators only understand violence since if they employed other means they would have been voted/booted out of power decades ago
Dash-Ate wrote:Friends with UK, Italy, France, US. A friend of the globalist, until he got out of line. TIme to change the guard, install a new dictator.
Do you see, we are being lied to in the so called news media??
They are playing us like fools. FOr 40 years they supported this dictator.
Absolutly but I wouldn't call us all friends. Libya and it's leader were tollerated since he renounced terrorism and pledged to work with the world instead of against it. Encouraging those actions is important as is also giving someone the benefit of the doubt. Catch is if they misbehave you gotta step in which is what we are doing. If your friend started beating the shit out of someone he was having a non physical debate with and was doing serious harm to said other person would you stand by and do nothing? If you tried to stop your friend and he just hit the stranger harder would you not than clock your friend across the face yourself?
Everyone says oil is not worth fighting for, "no blood for oil" blah blah blah. Well guess what, our world runs on it and yes, we all need it, have to have it and can't live with out it. It a sad reality but it is reality. The human cost is important too but make no mistake, destabilizing the world economy is also a huge factor in global decisions. You ever wonder why the world didn't really intervene in Sudan? Cost benefit analysis didn't add up. In my opinion the UN/NATO or whoever should have gone in guns blazing, bombed the President's mansion and said "next one to pick up a gun gets a bullet between the eyes". The civil war would have been over in days.
The bombing campaign in the former Yugoslavia did cost some civilian lives but how many lives were lost during the civil war? The bombing campaign ended that war and now look, they all still hate each other but no war.
Dictators understand one thing.
BTW the threat of action has already caused "our buddy" to call a ceasefire. Imagine that.
http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/World/2011031 ... ya-110318/
At least, that was the idea 20 years ago, before they proved their usefulness.
