Advice for career move
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
Advice for career move
Ive got 500TT with very little multi. Instructing, things are starting to improve after a slow winter. Multi / multi-ifr instructing prob long wait.
Opportunity to dispatch with part time F/O (just a few hours occaisionally) on turbine single. Leads to full-time F/O on turbine single after around a year. Company has twin turbines but prob long wait for that. Company seems pretty good.
Should I take the new job or stick with instructing?
Opportunity to dispatch with part time F/O (just a few hours occaisionally) on turbine single. Leads to full-time F/O on turbine single after around a year. Company has twin turbines but prob long wait for that. Company seems pretty good.
Should I take the new job or stick with instructing?
Have you tried single operators that also have twins?CClub wrote:From my experience with 1000TT 880PIC and no multi, I'd say stay instructing and at least build the PIC time. I've talked to many places, and no one is interested in a guy with 1000 hours but no multi. I got shot down pretty much every where I've looked.
- Cool Rythms!
- Rank 6

- Posts: 435
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:29 pm
- Location: Montreal
Redbaron, I tend to agree with Cclub. At this stage in the game (and it is a game!), I would stick with instructing for now, just to get your total time up. While it's nice to have some quality time in your logbook, most employers will be more concerned with your total hours. Too much instructing of course, isn't good, but it's the fastest way to build hours towards your ATPL. If you were able to fly part-time with this company, without having to work dispatch, you could always try combining the two, meaning instructing and building some turbine experience. However, if there is the possibility of full-time flying, then you might want to consider doing just that. It's really your call, but I would strongly suggest, that you don't drop instructing just yet. Keep you options open. Best of luck to you, with whichever choice you make.
Cool
Cool
"When the power of love overcomes the love for power, only then will this world know peace"
- Jimi Hendrix
- Jimi Hendrix
-
scotothedoublet
- Rank 3

- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:59 pm
- Contact:
When I started out a million years ago, I had a hard time getting night time for my ATP (now I've got 2 - whaddaya know). Ended up flying a 172 back and forth from town to town for weeks at night (free fuel! No, my employer supplied it). I would recommend that if you do not have it yet, stay put and get your night time so you will not be held up for that all-important ATP.
For the life of me. I can't see the purpose for a Cojo in a single - programming FMS? OK. Talking to ATC? Nope. CRM? In a single?
I did the road trip after wasting a year as a dispatcher ("...just wait 'til summers over and I'll check you out...") Got a float job in deepest darkest Sask, got laid off for a couple of winters and never looked back.
For me, corporate was the break I needed, but career-wise, more engines are better than one!
And so, to bed.
For the life of me. I can't see the purpose for a Cojo in a single - programming FMS? OK. Talking to ATC? Nope. CRM? In a single?
I did the road trip after wasting a year as a dispatcher ("...just wait 'til summers over and I'll check you out...") Got a float job in deepest darkest Sask, got laid off for a couple of winters and never looked back.
For me, corporate was the break I needed, but career-wise, more engines are better than one!
And so, to bed.
"What's it doing now?"
"Fly low and slow and throttle back in the turns."
"Fly low and slow and throttle back in the turns."
-
duplicate2
- Rank 5

- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:54 am
- Location: Limbo
I agree if this is a Caravan we're talking about, but what if it's a PC-12? Does everyone who runs PC-12s in Canada fly them 2 crew? Anyone ever had problems getting TC to sign off on PC-12 co-pilot time for ATPL?xsbank wrote:For the life of me. I can't see the purpose for a Cojo in a single - programming FMS? OK. Talking to ATC? Nope. CRM? In a single?
They'll sign off co-pilot time in a C172 if it's written into the C.O.M. that said machines are only to be flown 2 crew, but who in hell would do that? 
Aviation- the hardest way possible to make an easy living!
"You can bomb the world to pieces, but you can't bomb it into peace!" Michael Franti- Spearhead
"Trust everyone, but cut the cards". My Grandma.
"You can bomb the world to pieces, but you can't bomb it into peace!" Michael Franti- Spearhead
"Trust everyone, but cut the cards". My Grandma.
- Cat Driver
- Top Poster

- Posts: 18921
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm
" For the life of me. I can't see the purpose for a Cojo in a single - programming FMS? OK. Talking to ATC? Nope. CRM? In a single? "
The number of powerplants has no bearing on the need for two pilots on any flying machine.
Yes, CRM is part of the answer. It is all about safety and two pilots using proper CRM will lower the work load in high density IFR areas as well as at times when the work load gets high due to unsual circimstances.
One pilot talking to ATC can forget what ATC said, two pilots working in a properly structured enviorement will tend to not forget.
Cat
The number of powerplants has no bearing on the need for two pilots on any flying machine.
Yes, CRM is part of the answer. It is all about safety and two pilots using proper CRM will lower the work load in high density IFR areas as well as at times when the work load gets high due to unsual circimstances.
One pilot talking to ATC can forget what ATC said, two pilots working in a properly structured enviorement will tend to not forget.
Cat
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
-
Northern Skies
- Rank 8

- Posts: 769
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 2:00 pm
Its not caravans that they fly.
I know they fly with 2 pilots almost always, is there a way to know if there ops manual requires it?
Assuming legit copilot time for ATPL, it will still take long time since only 50% credit right? Thats what makes me wonder if instructing is the better route.
I know they fly with 2 pilots almost always, is there a way to know if there ops manual requires it?
Assuming legit copilot time for ATPL, it will still take long time since only 50% credit right? Thats what makes me wonder if instructing is the better route.
- CaptainHaddock
- Rank 4

- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:22 am
- Location: Nowhere fast
-
twindriver
- Rank 0

- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:58 am
keep instructing. obtain at least a class 2 before leaving instructing so it will be valid while you are trying your next job in case it doesn't work out. A class one is great too. just wait until you are in your 5th different ground school on piston or turbine twins and you say to yourself I could be teaching this.next thing you know you are the training captain and find yourself very valuable to that company.you will be checked out on everything that company owns, very secure and probably well taken care of.and of course you are still flying right now and will have less company's on your resume to show that you will stick around when they decide to give you that free pa-31 ppc because you look like a keeper.Instructing is steady and taking chances are risky, we all do that enough all day.

