New TA reached!

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Rockie »

rudder wrote:One thing that seems clear is that if the choice for the 35 year old new-hire is AC (DC pension) or WJ, there is much more career money (wages and non-wage compensation) to be had at WJ. Food for thought.
That is an excellent point. Salaries at Air Canada are inferior to Westjet especially for new hires, and the only thing Air Canada had going for them in the compensation department was the pension. Unless the proposed DC plan leaves people slackjawed in awe in comparison to Westjet, eliminating the DB pension removes most of the incentive to work at Air Canada vs. Westjet. Westjet has a much happier work force than Air Canada if you can stand stupid jokes, institutional jocularity and cleaning seats. Westjet has momentum going up vs. Air Canada going down. And Westjet doesn't kick their pilots to the curb at age 60.

How is Air Canada going to compete with that now for pilots?

That isn't Air Canada bashing, it's just the irrefutable facts of life that Air Canada has to deal with.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2795
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: New TA reached!

Post by yycflyguy »

Rockie wrote:
rudder wrote:One thing that seems clear is that if the choice for the 35 year old new-hire is AC (DC pension) or WJ, there is much more career money (wages and non-wage compensation) to be had at WJ. Food for thought.
That is an excellent point. Salaries at Air Canada are inferior to Westjet especially for new hires, and the only thing Air Canada had going for them in the compensation department was the pension. Unless the proposed DC plan leaves people slackjawed in awe in comparison to Westjet, eliminating the DB pension removes most of the incentive to work at Air Canada vs. Westjet. Westjet has a much happier work force than Air Canada if you can stand stupid jokes, institutional jocularity and cleaning seats. Westjet has momentum going up vs. Air Canada going down. And Westjet doesn't kick their pilots to the curb at age 60.

How is Air Canada going to compete with that now for pilots?

That isn't Air Canada bashing, it's just the irrefutable facts of life that Air Canada has to deal with.
Along that same line of thought. I had a couple of close friends who were interviewed and offered employment at BOTH Air Canada and WJ at the same time around 5 years ago. Neither one chose AC. Both are happy with their choice.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2795
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: New TA reached!

Post by yycflyguy »

What is the trend (post CCAA) in the AC pilot wages and working conditions? To be determined
I think it is safe to say that WAWCON has deteriorated for AC pilots post CCAA. We are not even keeping up with Cost of Living.
---------- ADS -----------
 
vic777
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 421
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:00 am

Re: New TA reached!

Post by vic777 »

Rockie wrote: How is Air Canada going to compete with that now for pilots?
put an ad in the paper ....

"Air Canada, Pilots wanted"

that should do it!

Seriously though, buying a CASE 580 backhoe is probably a better bet ....
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Rockie »

vic777 wrote:
Rockie wrote: How is Air Canada going to compete with that now for pilots?
put an ad in the paper ....

"Air Canada, Pilots wanted"

that should do it!

Seriously though, buying a CASE 580 backhoe is probably a better bet ....
Of course they'll still get people, afterall Mike the White can find people for his seats I'm sure Air Canada will still be able to as well. But it won't be their first choice.

I have a young family member just getting into the business and I used to tell him Air Canada is the place he wants to be despite all its faults. I can't say that anymore because he will be better off in the long run at Westjet.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1840
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Fanblade »

Rockie wrote:
rudder wrote:One thing that seems clear is that if the choice for the 35 year old new-hire is AC (DC pension) or WJ, there is much more career money (wages and non-wage compensation) to be had at WJ. Food for thought.
That is an excellent point. Salaries at Air Canada are inferior to Westjet especially for new hires, and the only thing Air Canada had going for them in the compensation department was the pension. Westjet has momentum going up vs. Air Canada going down.
Rockie,

That is what happens when you don't deal with the problem. You give, and give, and give. How much have AC pilots "given" since 2003 to protect the DB pension plan? How has "giving," to protect something that is unsustainable, worked for the group in the last 8-9 years? How much more "giving" do you want to do to protect it? Because that is what is going to happen at every crisis as it happens. Give give give give. How are those in the future going to get anything close to the same inflation adjusted DB benefit, once their best 5 years have been ravaged through pay cuts and stagnating pay?

At what point do you scratch your head, step back, and say. Hmmm something is wrong with this picture. In fairness of course your post sounds like you are almost there.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1840
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Fanblade »

Sorry meant to comment on what would be a good DC pension. Obviously it is not just the contribution levels. There needs to be an appreciable pay increase at the lower end to make this work.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Rockie »

You seem to have a good grasp of pension issues and legislation Fanblade, certainly better than mine and I don't mind admitting it. You have inspired me to re-read everything the ACPA committee has put out regarding our pension, but I have to tell you it is tough sledding. While they may know the subject cold, they absolutely suck at imparting that knowledge to us dopes. Like you I'm waiting to see what the DC pension is going to look like.

As far as giving to maintain something, maybe it's long past the time to just stop giving and go to the wall to protect what we have. Not to say there aren't things we can do to help the company and ourselves in that regard...dare I say extending the time we can work and not draw from the pension for one? There is one thing I can guarantee you though from past experience, once the company gets something from us their eyes shift hungrily to the next thing. At some point you have to stop giving.
---------- ADS -----------
 
the original tony
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:18 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by the original tony »

If CR wants to make this a real milestone contract, make it clear.
Like it or not, pilots and mechanics are the two groups required to make this
Company run. The rest are expendable. It takes a pilot a month to get through
the interview process, an FA gets online in three weeks, yet who takes concessions?
Pilots. Wildcat strikes to punch false time cards. And the rampies take no paycut.
The road is clear, protect who you need, skilled labour.
Enough guessing on our contract. Get rid of the "me too" clauses and get serious.
That itself will save millions.
Gate agents getting paid more than FO's to be rude to our customers. Sounds like a money
maker to me.
If you don't like your job and hate AC that much, leave. Nobody is forcing you to stay here and make our company less competitive.
Rant over.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
yyz monkey
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:36 am
Location: CNC3

Re: New TA reached!

Post by yyz monkey »

Tony,

It doesn't matter who you are at this company - pilot, mx, ramp rat, gate agent, inflight - without any of us, this company doesn't run.

None of us are any more important, in the grand scheme of things, than the other. Throwing the other employee groups under the bus does no one any good, except management.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The Theory of Flight - Because even after 100 years, we're still not sure it works!
the original tony
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:18 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by the original tony »

Yes, it is a complete effort. Yes, division is a bad thing.
But why is it ALWAYS the front group taking the brunt on concessions?
If we don't protect what is ours first and foremost we are in a lot of trouble.
From laying blame on a delay to the flight being late due to whatever, we get the calls into The office. And when concessions are to be made, ironically we get called on again,
Like mikey, he'll eat anything......ask the pilots they like getting bent over, they'll do anything.
Not this time.
We took cuts so other groups didn't have to, now it's their turn to get in line.
---------- ADS -----------
 
accumulous
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:05 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by accumulous »

As far as giving to maintain something, maybe it's long past the time to just stop giving and go to the wall to protect what we have.
And this is from the Internet CAW Public Website.
http://www.caw2002tca.ca

Air Canada CAW Negotiations

As the global economy recovers, so too will investments for pension plans. We will be vigilant in protecting our pension plans, as secure pension benefits for our current and future retirees must be maintained. We do not intend to have this round of bargaining sidetracked by pension discussions.

Obviously the CAW, with an abundance of smarts, doesn't intend to entertain dumping their own DB Plan.

It should prove noteworthy to the CAW that the Company savings incurred through the Pilots dumping their own DB plan in the Round File, just because a billion dollar pension, to a pilot, seems to be a fair trade for a 3 percent raise, ought to pay for the other Unions keeping their own DB pensions.

That's the problem with leading at the Pointy End. You have absolutely no idea what the intelligent people back in the cabin are doing.
---------- ADS -----------
 
MackTheKnife
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:54 am
Location: The 'Wet Coast"

Re: New TA reached!

Post by MackTheKnife »

yyz monkey wrote:Tony,

Throwing the other employee groups under the bus does no one any good, except management.

And that's exactly what the pilots will do, YET AGAIN, with this DB/DC can of worms. Who here doesn't think for one moment that once the pilots accept this DC POC concoction ( and they will ), that the company won't launch headstrong against the rest of the employee groups with the same demands?

If ACPA thought the pilot group was despised before, I suggest they issue every pilot with a helmet instead of a cap when walking through the terminals. The pilots will be forever known as the group who sold the pension down the river !
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cry me a river, build a bridge and get over it !!!
User avatar
yyz monkey
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:36 am
Location: CNC3

Re: New TA reached!

Post by yyz monkey »

the original tony wrote:Yes, it is a complete effort. Yes, division is a bad thing.
But why is it ALWAYS the front group taking the brunt on concessions?
Simple - because we (as the group of front line employees) refuse to stand up to management and, with one voice, tell them no. Everyone is too busy looking out for & protecting their own little slice of the company instead of banding together with everyone else.
the original tony wrote:If we don't protect what is ours first and foremost we are in a lot of trouble.
From laying blame on a delay to the flight being late due to whatever, we get the calls into The office.
Hey, BTW gets just as much blame for delays as ATW, IFS & Flt Ops does. The problem here is that no one in management seems able or willing to figure out why they delay occurred in the first place - they're more interested in covering their collective asses and tossing the blame on someone else so they can get their bonus.
the original tony wrote:And when concessions are to be made, ironically we get called on again
Yup, and you never see the brass taking any cuts. I took Montie to task for this on the old employee forum when he was here and was talking about cutbacks back in 2007 or 2008 - but I was the only voice doing so.
the original tony wrote:We took cuts so other groups didn't have to, now it's their turn to get in line.
Well, from what I've heard talking with the senior guys that are out and about on the ramp, the pilot group wasn't the only one to take cuts.

None of us front line employees deserve to be bent over when the company is in dire straits - the axe should fall on management for leading us there in the first place - but because we're such a fractured employee group (even fractures within different employee groups) management can get away with these shenanigans time and again.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The Theory of Flight - Because even after 100 years, we're still not sure it works!
User avatar
Doug Moore
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:44 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Doug Moore »

FICU wrote:As has been mentioned here even though there is protection for a DB plan not all of the money is protected should something happen to the company down the road. My company has only ever had a DC pension plan so there is no other option for me. I have no problem with managing the money for my retirement and am secure in knowing that whatever the company has contributed to the plan remains mine and can't be touched. I'm sure AC will be around for a very long time but with the moves ACE has made in the recent past I wouldn't bet all my chips the company will look the same.
Hi FICU,

I note that you say that your employer has a DC plan and so there is no other option for you. I don’t want to come across as beating up on you or your DC plan so I ask that you take what I have to say below as an expression of my opinion on pensions in general and not a personal criticism of you and your DC plan. Hope that’s understood.

You say about your DC Plan that you are “secure in knowing that whatever the company has contributed to the plan remains mine and can’t be touched.” I would ask: not touched by whom? I would presume that the money in your DC plan is invested, and thus is exposed, “touched” if you will, by all the forces at play in the investment world. You can sum up all those forces with one word: risk. Risk doesn’t care if your money is in a DC Plan or a DB Plan, it will take its toll without discrimination. The difference between DC and DB is that you assume all the risk in your DC Plan and live with its consequences, whereas with DB the employer assumes all the risk and you can sleep soundly at night not having to worry about what tomorrow might bring. So in terms of money that “can’t be touched”, I would say that both plans are touched equally.

Perhaps you were thinking of the case where the company goes bankrupt, the DB Plan has to be terminated, and that whatever the company has contributed to the plan won’t remain yours and can be touched. I’m also unsure what you consider constitutes ”all of the money”.

In our DB Plan, each month the employee makes a contribution and the employer makes a contribution and these two amounts are pooled together, held “in Trust” on your behalf and invested. Depending on investment performance, at any given time there will be less money, the same money, or more money than the total contributions deposited by employee and the employer. If the employer was to go bankrupt and the plan wound up, then, depending on the wind-up rules in the plan, you would get returned to you from the Trust less dollars, the same dollars or more dollars (also dependant on the investment performance of the plan) than that which you had personally contributed. In a wind-up situation, the plan would have to be seriously, seriously under-funded for you not to get returned to you at least all the dollars (all of the money) contributed by you and the employer. Because don’t forget, the solvency of a DB Plan is based upon what it promises to pay out on retirement, and not on the simple dollars contributed by you to the plan. There is no similar solvency test for a DC Plan because it doesn’t promise you anything.

On the other hand, if you consider what the DB plan promises to pay you on retirement as “all of the money”, then I would agree with you: “not all of the money is protected should something happen to the company”. That is so because the company promises to pay you a lifetime pension and no one knows how much constitutes “all of the money” that will be paid to you until after the day you die and the last retirement cheque has been paid out.

For example, and for the sake of simplicity, let’s say that on average throughout your career you contribute $500/month towards your pension and at the end of 30 years the plan promises to pay you $100,000/year. So over 30 years you would have contributed $180,000 into the plan and for sake of argument let’s say the employer paid in on your behalf an equal amount for a sum total of $360,000. In less than 2 years of retirement you will have been paid back the $180K that you originally put in and in a little more than 3 ½ years you will have received back all of the money that both you and the employer put in. For the remainder of your retirement days, if you live for another 30 years, the DB plan promises to keep paying you that $100K every year. Where does that money come from? It comes from the investment performance of the plan, the hundreds of millions of dollars invested and held for all the pilots. Who guarantees the investment performance of the plan? The employer.

Consider a DC plan. That $360,000 total amount that you and the employer contributed over 30 years will, roughly calculated, buy you and your wife a lifetime $21,000/year last survivor annuity. Now what about that $100K/year pension provided by the DB plan? Well, to get that amount of annual pension you’ll need roughly $1.8 Million so you have to hope that your investment savvy will turn that $360K into $1.8M. For the average guy, of which I consider myself to be one, I see that as a daunting task, and loaded with risk and uncertainty.

To complicate matters, or I would say, to make matters worse, there is no guarantee at all for your investment. The risk is all yours. Retire, as I did, during an economic downturn and you could get wiped out. What is in your DC plan on retirement day is what you have to retire on. Lose 30-40% in the year or two before retirement and all of a sudden your 1.8M (if you were smart enough and lucky enough to get that kind of return in the first place) is more like 1.1 or 1.2 and that $100K pension you were looking forward to is now 55-60K. Things might even be worse.

So let’s be clear. There is no magic here. A DB Plan, in terms of an investment vehicle for your retirement, provides you the best risk protection that you could ever wish for when it comes to providing retirement income. Yes, the employer is the guarantor and if the employer goes bankrupt, then the landscape changes. A DC Plan, in terms of an investment vehicle, provides no risk protection at all when it comes to providing retirement income. The employer guarantees you nothing, and if it goes bankrupt you may, or may not have the same amount of money in your DC Plan that would have been held in Trust and returned to you from the wind-up of the DB Plan. Most significantly, what disappears with the wind-up of a DB Plan is the promise to pay a specific level of retirement income – and you never, ever had that from the git-go with your DC Plan.

I am not a financial guru, I have no formal investment training; I speak solely from my life’s experiences, from my heart and from my gut feel. I see discussions such as these as learning experiences and often I learn more from these discussions than I contribute. I welcome constructive criticism and opposing viewpoints.

Cheers,
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Thirteentennorth
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:06 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Thirteentennorth »

Rockie wrote:You seem to have a good grasp of pension issues and legislation Fanblade, certainly better than mine and I don't mind admitting it. You have inspired me to re-read everything the ACPA committee has put out regarding our pension, but I have to tell you it is tough sledding. While they may know the subject cold, they absolutely suck at imparting that knowledge to us dopes...
Hey Rockie, don't wait for ACPA to put out an info bulletin; get yourself down to ACPA HQ, present your membership card, and demand to be shown ALL documents pertaining to pensions, including all achival material. That is your right as a dues-paying member. While you're at it, you might as well ask to be shown all MEC minutes pertaining to Age 60. That too is your right and you may be very surprised as to what a little diligent archival research yields!!

One caveat. You'll need a good supply of Country Style Donuts black java [can't stand that Tim Horton's stuff].

Have fun stormin' de castle!

Cheers,

Iain.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The 4 most important words for a pilot: BRAKES SET, GO-AROUND!
the original tony
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:18 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by the original tony »

If anyone gets thrown under anything or into anything (fanblade turkey test)
It better be the top end. Salaries are never 100% disclosed. Bonuses never fully
Transparent. Why again? F$"c the pension, F:,k wage increases. All is off the table until
all employees see what the managers and higher ups make and lost when we gave up all for the company a few years back. If not one park brake is released these guys are shit out o luck. Try getting your bonus now B&$/@es. And im not talking about the 50 cents you get for OTP and less hate from customers. This company makes a LOT of money. Let's see some if it. And to start, status quo for the top, or less. Then we talk about the rest. When an FO starting out makes the same as full time at a corner store......
Manager=bonus=STRIKE.
let's see that OTP now .
I need a drink.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Deerinheadlights
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 3:32 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Deerinheadlights »

I was reading this thread.Starting to feel bad for those that were fighting this losing battle of DC vs. DB! Pensions dropping,people slipping into poverty.Then someone said their pension would be $100,000+/year.I really started to cry! But it wasn't for them.

I believe everyone deserves a good pension after putting in 25-35 years of life to a company.When I retire at age (60) with 30 years with company and pension I will collect approx. $35,000/yr pension.And all I do is make sure the bolts holding the wing on after install are tight then sign my name to it.

If we are all equal then maybe our pensions should be equal.How about 30 years of cleaning urine and vomit of seats for poor cleaners? They deserves something don't you think.Come join me.
I don't think you are going to invite me to your party!

Snag: Something loose in cockpit.
Fix: Something tightened.

Snag :Right engine missing.
Fix: After brief search engine found on right wing.

I should have been a pilot.
---------- ADS -----------
 
fish4life
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2555
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:32 am

Re: New TA reached!

Post by fish4life »

ya but the guys cleaning vomit didn't invest anything into an education and still made more money starting off than a pilot... especially now
---------- ADS -----------
 
MackTheKnife
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:54 am
Location: The 'Wet Coast"

Re: New TA reached!

Post by MackTheKnife »

Deerinheadlights wrote:I was reading this thread.Starting to feel bad for those that were fighting this losing battle of DC vs. DB! Pensions dropping,people slipping into poverty.Then someone said their pension would be $100,000+/year.I really started to cry! But it wasn't for them.

I believe everyone deserves a good pension after putting in 25-35 years of life to a company.When I retire at age (60) with 30 years with company and pension I will collect approx. $35,000/yr pension.And all I do is make sure the bolts holding the wing on after install are tight then sign my name to it.

If we are all equal then maybe our pensions should be equal.How about 30 years of cleaning urine and vomit of seats for poor cleaners? They deserves something don't you think.Come join me.
I don't think you are going to invite me to your party!


I should have been a pilot.

If you want to invest close to $1000 a month for 35 years towards your pension, you too can have a pension of $120,000.00 a year ! NO ? I didn;t think so ! You get what you've paid for ( into )
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cry me a river, build a bridge and get over it !!!
User avatar
Doug Moore
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:44 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Doug Moore »

Deerinheadlights wrote:I believe everyone deserves a good pension after putting in 25-35 years of life to a company. When I retire at age (60) with 30 years with company and pension I will collect approx. $35,000/yr pension.

If we are all equal then maybe our pensions should be equal.

I should have been a pilot.
Hi Dearinheadlights,

I think that you would have enjoyed being a pilot! I agree with you, everyone – including the cleaners – deserves a “good” pension after 25-35 years employment with any company.

Unfortunately, what we deserve and what we get are usually two different things. A Defined Benefit Plan retirement pension is usually based on your years of service and a percentage of your Final Average Earnings over your best (which normally is your last) 5 year’s employment. Pension actuaries, whose expertise is in calculating the cost and funding formulae for these pension plans, do all the number crunching and then tell you how much money has to be put into the plan, together with predicted investment targets, to produce a monthly pension cheque at a given retirement age. In other words, you have to pay during your working life for whatever monthly amount you want your plan to provide on retirement.

You mentioned that your pension will be approximately $35K/year and that is what you paid for. A person who receives a $100K/year pension will have paid significantly more for that pension amount.

It’s no different than purchasing a car. You can walk onto a Honda car lot and drive off in either a $15,000 Civic Sedan or a $30,000 Civic Si Coupe. They’re both Civics, but you ride off the lot in what you pay for, not what you want; same thing with pensions.

As human beings, yes, we are all equal but when it comes to pensions you get what you pay for. Just like our wages, we get what we negotiate. It’s not written down anywhere that life is, or has to be, fair.

Cheers,
---------- ADS -----------
 
FICU
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:37 am

Re: New TA reached!

Post by FICU »

Doug Moore wrote: Hi FICU,

I note that you say that your employer has a DC plan and so there is no other option for you. I don’t want to come across as beating up on you or your DC plan so I ask that you take what I have to say below as an expression of my opinion on pensions in general and not a personal criticism of you and your DC plan. Hope that’s understood.
Hi Doug,

I wholeheartedly agree that a well funded DB pension plan with a stable company throughout your career is by far the best plan. Where I am, with a large exposure to economic(read oil) turbulence because of a much larger charter ratio compared to scheduled operation my company is at a greater risk to being upset then a schedule reliant airline. The past recession and crash of oil put a beating on us but we weathered the storm and have recovered beyond our pre-recession state into a more diversified airline and are growing and doing very well.

Years ago I didn't know much about DB pensions other than what I know from the US so you can see why I was happy to have a DC pension with my airline. My point about, "all the money being mine", reflects the fact that once the money is in the account it won't be affected by anything whatsoever to do with the financial state of the company or if they went under. As you said, the money in a DB pension is always in the hands of the employer which up until now I felt would be risky and may ultimately pose a risk to the AC crews. I also agree that all the risk is mine but putting it in the hands of professionals helps mitigate that risk considerably. We are only 12 years old and I don't know of any "newer" airlines in Canada that have a DB pension plan and that must be for a good reason. DB pensions are really only seen with municipal, provincial, federal, and blue chip companies in today's world... and Air Canada. :)

Best of luck with the negotiations and with holding on to what you have.

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Doug Moore
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:44 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Doug Moore »

Hi FICU,

Now I better understand your circumstances and where you're coming from.

Thanks, and all the best to you too!

Cheers,
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Doug Moore
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:44 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by Doug Moore »

Fanblade wrote:I believe that is not entirely true anymore. The "distressed pension workout scheme" provisions within the new legislation tip the scale toward the company. Not all the way, but it nevertheless favors the company. Companies used to have to fail to get out of their liability. Now the legislation allows for dealing with the pension liability in advance of CCAA. The devil is always in the details. This devil is negotiations with a CCAA gun to your head, that ultimately require OFSI and gov't approval. Now think about how you think that will play out.

Why did the gov't do this? Because unions have refused to budge. Making failure of corporations the only way out of debt burdens they can not support. Not good for the overall welfare of the country. So guess who looses? Guess who is being set up to loose?

So what used to take wiping out shareholders to accomplish, now means corporate executives can try to shed pension liability, without hurting the shareholders at all. How convenient! In fact, if they are successful they can increase shareholder value. Awesome!

I am willing to sit a listen. For no other reason than I really don't have a better option. The last thing I want to happen, is the regulator basically dictated how this will unfold.

As silent majority pointed out. At the moment CR is touting DC from here on out as the solution. If we say no? Can you promise me the solution imposed later will be any better? Because in 30 month,as the past service moratorium ends, AC will very very likely be in a position to request help under the new distressed pension workout scheme legislation.

Being a retiree have you had access to information from the union, regarding the warnings all AC unions have received from the minister of finance in this regard?
Hi Fanblade,

I have been trying to understand your concern about the "distressed pension workout scheme" that you apparently believe puts us at a disadvantage. I refer again to this analysis of the proposed federal pension plan workout scheme: http://www.mcmillan.ca/Files/118845_Dis ... n_0111.pdf

To quote from that document:
“The workout scheme is designed to provide a statutory mechanism to allow an employer who sponsors a federally regulated active pension plan with breathing room in which to negotiate and restructure potentially crippling pension obligations. If successful, the negotiations will result in a reordered amortization schedule of the statutory special or “catch-up” payments that the employer is obligated to make to in order to fund deficits that have developed in the pension plan. The workout scheme does not provide an employer with any relief with respect to its statutory obligations to fund the ongoing normal pension costs of the pension plan.”

The way I read the above is that this workout scheme does not give the employer “any relief with respect to its statutory obligations to fund the ongoing normal pension costs of the pension plan” but rather, it provides a “statutory mechanism” to allow the employer “breathing room” to negotiate and re-structure “catch-up” payments that the employer is obligated to make to address solvency deficits that have developed as a result of poor investment performance. This is legislation that allows for a payment delay, not payment forgiveness. So how is that a bad thing and how can that be used against us? Therefore, I don’t at all see how, as you put it, “corporate executives can try to shed pension liability”.

I also don’t understand how, as you put it, the company “can increase shareholder value” through the implementation of this workout scheme.

Perhaps you can expand on your concerns in order to help us all better understand?

Cheers,

PS. No, I don’t recall having received any info from the union and/or the Finance Minister with reference to the workout scheme.
---------- ADS -----------
 
torx
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 1:46 pm

Re: New TA reached!

Post by torx »

the original tony wrote:If CR wants to make this a real milestone contract, make it clear.
Like it or not, pilots and mechanics are the two groups required to make this
Company run. The rest are expendable. It takes a pilot a month to get through
the interview process, an FA gets online in three weeks, yet who takes concessions?
Pilots. Wildcat strikes to punch false time cards. And the rampies take no paycut.
The road is clear, protect who you need, skilled labour.
Enough guessing on our contract. Get rid of the "me too" clauses and get serious.
That itself will save millions.
Gate agents getting paid more than FO's to be rude to our customers. Sounds like a money
maker to me.
If you don't like your job and hate AC that much, leave. Nobody is forcing you to stay here and make our company less competitive.
Rant over.
Tony? I don't even know where to begin poking holes in your rubbish.
Pilots and AMEs' eh? What about Flight attendants? Sub those out? Brilliant!
I believe the W/C strike was related to other reasons...I'll let you do the research.
And Rampies took no paycuts? Hmmm....ask around.
Gate agents being rude and highly paid? Absolutely correct there mon ami. I agree. But I may add that Food Truck drivers and even the CATSA people who pleasantly scan you before you go airside, make more than a Junior FO. Problem is... there is an unlimited supply of people willing to work for peanuts. Sorry, but that's reality.
So you sub-contract out all the Rampies, F/As, CSAs, Cargo and say Load Planning...then what happens to all those pension contributions? Understand that even new hires making $12/hr are paying into our Pension Fund. And BTW...at least 35% of the Rampies are P/T and about 30% of the F/T Rampies are new hires (1-3 years).Both groups well under $15 AFAIK.
Also I know numerous employees that hate Air Canada, hate their job and most of their co-workers too, but they won't quit. Why? Dunno...maybe they'll share some insight here. They know who they are!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”