A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Right Seat Captain, lilfssister, North Shore
A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
I have decided to complete a self sponsored A320 Type Rating with CAE in Toronto for a potential job in the Middle East. I am looking for a training partner to complete the course within the next few months.
Please let me know if there are any takers?
Please let me know if there are any takers?
- fingersmac
- Rank 7
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:17 pm
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
Pretty expensive gamble.delay256 wrote:I have decided to complete a self sponsored A320 Type Rating with CAE in Toronto for a potential job in the Middle East. I am looking for a training partner to complete the course within the next few months.
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 2:13 pm
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
Hey, pilots get married every day.
At least this guy is guaranteed to have something to show for his gamble, regardless of how the job works out - a type rating on his ATPL!
At least this guy is guaranteed to have something to show for his gamble, regardless of how the job works out - a type rating on his ATPL!
- fingersmac
- Rank 7
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:17 pm
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
I highly suspect this person does not have an ATPL.
Most likely a CPL, 250hrs and a case of SJS.
Most likely a CPL, 250hrs and a case of SJS.
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
@fingersmac
I have 1100 Hours and a frozen ATPL.
This isn't a debate about the advantages/disadvantages of paying for type ratings. I have spoken to several airlines and they have indicated that this is the right way forward.
I am just looking for a training partner to reduce training costs.
I have 1100 Hours and a frozen ATPL.
This isn't a debate about the advantages/disadvantages of paying for type ratings. I have spoken to several airlines and they have indicated that this is the right way forward.
I am just looking for a training partner to reduce training costs.
- cdnpilot77
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
Of course they say that, then they dont have to pay for it, it waters down the competition for jobs and allows them to make low ball offers because you just dropped 30k+ on a rating and are now desperate for a job before it expires....just out of curiosity, did any of them actually say "get a TR and you will have a job with us"? Why wouldnt they tell you this is the way forward? Good riddance man...keep that mentality on the other side of the pond, dont bring it here!
- fingersmac
- Rank 7
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:17 pm
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
Are you that naive? Of course airlines say it's the "right" way forward; you're paying for training that should be provided by the company potentially hiring you!
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
"frozen ATPL" - keep telling yourself that.
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
Seriously What is wrong with you people?
I just posted this to find a training partner.
I just posted this to find a training partner.
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
An MBA costs $45,000 to $60,000 easy which eventually leads to higher salaries and better positions in the corporate world. How is this any different?
I dont know if all of this pays off and I do realize these are hard times for all of us but I have made my decision.
@altiplano - Fine! I have completed the SARON and SAMRA and have written the ATPL exams back in the Middle East. (Call it whatever you want to call it)
Again guys, I am just here to look for a sim partner.
I dont know if all of this pays off and I do realize these are hard times for all of us but I have made my decision.
@altiplano - Fine! I have completed the SARON and SAMRA and have written the ATPL exams back in the Middle East. (Call it whatever you want to call it)
Again guys, I am just here to look for a sim partner.
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
Have you asked yourself why you're expected to pay for type specific training for these companies you talked to, while everywhere else the company pays to train their employees after they've been hired? A type rating is not an MBA, it isn't as useful and versatile, and an MBA doesn't cost as much as an A320 type rating.
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 8132
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
The general rule about paying for your training is, you should not expected to pay for training specific to the job you are trying to get that isn't applicable at any other job.
An instrument rating, an ATPL, an MBA, they are all widely transferable and are basic qualifications for a job. An A320 rating is not, it is job specific. Please do us and yourself a favour and don't try to get ahead by selling yourself out.
It is much more satisfying to have somebody else put you on a course, even if it is years later. It says you are worth something.
An instrument rating, an ATPL, an MBA, they are all widely transferable and are basic qualifications for a job. An A320 rating is not, it is job specific. Please do us and yourself a favour and don't try to get ahead by selling yourself out.
It is much more satisfying to have somebody else put you on a course, even if it is years later. It says you are worth something.
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
I see it as an investment in my future, a chance to move ahead. Many jobs today require you to have job specific training courses completed before you join I dont see how aviation is any different.
@iflyforpie Im pretty sure you would do the same if you were in my shoes. I made near nothing as a flight instructor and dont see any positive outlook on the job front here in Canada which has led me to try back home.
@iflyforpie Im pretty sure you would do the same if you were in my shoes. I made near nothing as a flight instructor and dont see any positive outlook on the job front here in Canada which has led me to try back home.
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 8132
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
I would not even if the job was guaranteed, secure, and well-paying, which from the sounds of it is none of those. Ask some ex-Jetsgo guys about how paying for their training turned out.delay256 wrote: @iflyforpie Im pretty sure you would do the same if you were in my shoes. I made near nothing as a flight instructor and dont see any positive outlook on the job front here in Canada which has led me to try back home.
I have managed to make a living in aviation without shelling out money for company specific training. I have purposefully avoided any companies that wanted money or bonds for training and I believe it has payed dividends not only in money saved, but in quality of life, safety, and self-respect. There were times when I wondered if I had missed the boat on a better career, but any regrets soon vanished when watching the aftermath of others' decisions to go those routes.
If nobody was willing to pay for training, the companies would have to. But it seems that there is always somebody who has several grand to throw away (how did you get that making 'near nothing?') to 'buy' themselves a job. A320, PA31, or C182 jumper course, it is all the same.
Once the company realizes that you will pay for training, what else are they going to make you pay for, and how well do you think they will pay?
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
In what way is a type-rating company specific? Lots of airlines fly A320s, don't they?
Why is a type rating any different from a multi- rating?
Why is a type rating any different from a multi- rating?
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
- Shiny Side Up
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5335
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Group W bench
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
A lot more companies have multi engine aircraft than have A320s. That and it wouldn't be out of the question for an individual to benefit privately from having a multi rating, relatively rare, but within the realm of probability. Few individuals could use an A320 type rating privately, and definitely no one who works as a pilot.photofly wrote:In what way is a type-rating company specific? Lots of airlines fly A320s, don't they?
Why is a type rating any different from a multi- rating?
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
If there is a difference it would seem to be one of (slight) degree, rather than black and white. You could make the same argument that an airline should pay not only for your type rating but also your multi-, IFR, CPL, and probably PPL too. Regardless of what some pilots might use it for, to the person who's interested in an airline job even a basic PPL is just as useless (or useful) as a type rating, they're both just bits of paper that get you employed.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
- Shiny Side Up
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5335
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Group W bench
Re: A320 Type Rating- Looking for Training Partner
Hardly a slight degree. For example, I make regular use of my pilot skillz outside of working as a pilot, which so far has included the use of my seaplane, multi and instrument ratings. I can think of no means of using an A320 rating to do that outside of the possibility of maybe aquiring the means of say John Travolta.If there is a difference it would seem to be one of (slight) degree, rather than black and white.
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!