* AvCanada's Home Page * Photo Gallery * Directory * Topsites *Weather *Enter Chat * Media Kit
It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 12:21 am



All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is chatting

Who is chatting
Enter Chat




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: A-10
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:14 pm 
Offline
Rank 11
Rank 11
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:17 am
Posts: 4199
Location: Over Macho Grande
Hope this isn't a repost:



Thank you, Colonel John Boyd, USAF (retd), where ever
you are!

The A-10 was an odd airplane - it was only developed by the USAF,
which hated John Boyd and the A-10, to deny the money to it's
worst enemy, the US Army.

John Boyd was responsible for the F-15, F-16, F-18 and A-10. You
might have heard of them.

It's a real pity he wasn't around to straighten out the F-22 and JSF.

He lack of influence on those programs is obvious.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
Rank 4
Rank 4

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 278
Thanks for that - brings back memories of a School Trip to Mildenhall Airbase in Suffolk, UK when I was about 9 or 10 which was the first time I ever got up close and personal with a Warbird. The A-10 is still one of my favourite jet aircraft.
The safety briefing still sticks in my head. "If you hear an alarm, go stand next to the nearest wall. The crash trucka won't see or stop for you, but they know where the walls are."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline
Rank 11
Rank 11

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:25 pm
Posts: 3782
Location: left coast
AWESOME :mrgreen: :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:08 am 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:11 pm
Posts: 580
Colonel Sanders wrote:

John Boyd was responsible for the F-15, F-16, F-18 and A-10.



I think it's fair to say that Pierre Sprey really was the guy behind the A-10 (yeah you could argue that Boyd was the guy behind Pierre Sprey...)

I'm not sure Boyd would be happy to hear that he was responsible for the F-15 and F-16 :wink: .
He aimed for much better, but the bureaucrats/technocrats got their hands too deep in theses projects.
What he wanted was lighter and much more maneuverable than what got out the production lines. As for the F-18, he was sort of the loser in the F-16 development competition.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:51 am 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7

Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Posts: 635
Location: Yow!
Always been my favorite plane. So many redundant and functional design aspects.
Interesting features off the top of my head- triple hydraulic systems, can fly minus one engine, one tail, and half the wing area compromised. Vulcan cannon offset to accommodate nose gear. The giant Garrett turbofans mounted in the most protected position from ground fire, cockpit housed in titanium and Kevlar tub.... Seem to remember something about the Vulcan actually slowing the aircraft down.
Anyone remember the story of the USAF chick flying back in half an a10?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:29 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:17 am
Posts: 1730
Location: west to east
the other way around, gear offset so cannon on centerline, GE CF34 equivalents. Just a toe-toe brawler of an airplane


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline
Rank 11
Rank 11
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:17 am
Posts: 4199
Location: Over Macho Grande
It's funny how the LWF "loser" (F-18) went on to become the mainstay
of so many military forces, so many decades later ... RCAF, USN, Aussies, etc.

Well, they finally got rid of John Boyd and the bureaucrats had a free hand
at the F-35, and look what they got.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:01 pm 
Offline
Rank 7
Rank 7
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:11 pm
Posts: 580
DanWEC wrote:
Seem to remember something about the Vulcan actually slowing the aircraft down.


They also have to keep inside all the empty shells to not disturb too much the W&B of the airplane!



Colonel, we still don't know how the F35 is going to perform once operational. It might no be as bad as you think.
Remember that Boyd was pissed at what the F-15 ended up becoming, yet it became nonetheless the best air to air fighter of an era.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:15 am 
Offline
Rank 11
Rank 11
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:17 am
Posts: 4199
Location: Over Macho Grande
Quote:
the Vulcan actually slowing the aircraft down


Of course! Isaac Newton (a very unpleasant fellow, by all accounts)
described exactly that :wink:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion

My father flew (and loved) the F-86 Sabre, and he says that you could
lose 50 knots when you fired the six Browning 50 caliber machine guns
it was equipped with, and they were only tiny 12.7mm pea shooters
compared to the honking huge depleted uranium 35mm rounds the
A-10 fired. Also, the rate of fire is over 3x on the A-10 vs the M3.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:48 pm 
Offline
Rank 0
Rank 0

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:09 pm
Posts: 8
DanWEC wrote:
Always been my favorite plane. So many redundant and functional design aspects.
Interesting features off the top of my head- triple hydraulic systems, can fly minus one engine, one tail, and half the wing area compromised. Vulcan cannon offset to accommodate nose gear. The giant Garrett turbofans mounted in the most protected position from ground fire, cockpit housed in titanium and Kevlar tub.... Seem to remember something about the Vulcanactually slowing the aircraft down.
Anyone remember the story of the USAF chick flying back in half an a10?



The gun the A-10 was desingned around is the GAU-8 Avenger, not the Vulcan.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: A-10
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 5:47 am 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 22
Bad-ass. Thanks for that Col.

Wish we still had Mavericks, they would've been handy...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 


All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Genetk44, Google [Bot] and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

 
For questions/comments please send them to
webmaster@avcanada.ca


AvCanada Topsites List
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

While the administrators and moderators of this  forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as  quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. If you feel a  topic or post is inappropriate email us at support@avcanada.ca .  By reading these forums you acknowledge that  all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and  not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these  people) and hence will not be held liable. This website is not responsible or liable in any way for any false or misleading messages or job ads placed at our site.   

Use AvCanada's information at your own risk!

We reserve the right to remove any messages that we deem unacceptable.
  When you post a message, your IP is logged and may be provided to concerned parties where unethical or illegal  behavior is apparent. All rights reserved.