* AvCanada's Home Page * Photo Gallery * Directory * Topsites *Weather *Enter Chat * Media Kit
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:17 pm



All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is chatting

Who is chatting
Enter Chat




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:17 pm 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:42 pm
Posts: 88
Nine members of the Canadian Forces are safe after their military aircraft caught fire at a base in the U.S.

The CC-130 Hercules was participating in a training exercise when it caught fire at the Naval Air Station in Key West, Fla.

Those on board made a successful emergency landing and fire crews put out the flames.

The military is describing damage to the aircraft as "extensive."

Lt.-Col. Richard Pamplin, who commands the crew's squadron, says he's proud of the way those on board followed through on their training and got everyone out safely.

He adds that he's "relieved" to confirm all those who were on board are safe and in good spirits.

The aircraft and crew are from 435 Transport and Rescue Squadron of 17 Wing Winnipeg.

They were providing air-to-air refuelling support for the training of new CF-18 fighter pilots from 4 Wing Cold Lake in Alberta.

An investigation has been launched to determined the cause of the blaze.


From the CBC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:17 pm 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:47 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Eat at Joe's Diner
Who's buying the drinks in Margaritaville tonight? Not these guys.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:29 am 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:23 am
Posts: 358
Bravo Zulu


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:04 pm 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:19 pm
Posts: 25
The aftermath of the fire:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:55 am 
Offline
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 4:01 am
Posts: 2128
Holy crap! :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:55 am 
Offline
Rank 6
Rank 6

Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:17 pm
Posts: 487
Sulako wrote:
Holy crap! :shock:


Holy CRAP, Indeed.....imagine the toxins when you get an interior fire like that one. Lads were obviously lucky.
:bear: :bear:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:32 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:42 pm
Posts: 88
Attachment:
P1010854.JPG
P1010854.JPG [ 69.54 KiB | Viewed 3006 times ]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:35 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:42 pm
Posts: 88
Attachment:
c130 fire 024.jpg
c130 fire 024.jpg [ 54.75 KiB | Viewed 3000 times ]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:28 pm 
Online
Rank 4
Rank 4
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:11 am
Posts: 248
Location: North of YMX
Is that one of the old Hercules or a new one?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:37 am 
Offline
Rank 1
Rank 1

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:19 pm
Posts: 25
It's one of the H-models we bought in the 90's. This particular one was an aerial refueling tanker.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:20 am 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 391
Location: Trenton
We can rebuild it, we have the technology.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:52 am 
Offline
Rank (9)
Rank (9)

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:34 am
Posts: 1026
Had that aircraft had extensive rewire work completed at a facility near Abbotsford recently?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:58 am 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:42 am
Posts: 834
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:20 pm 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:40 pm
Posts: 948
Location: YXL
Quote:
It's one of the H-models we bought in the 90's.


Do they make "stubby" H models ? - I thought H models were stretched -- but I have been wrong before :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:07 pm 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 391
Location: Trenton
Liquid Charlie wrote:
Quote:
It's one of the H-models we bought in the 90's.


Do they make "stubby" H models ? - I thought H models were stretched -- but I have been wrong before :?


Most of the CFs H fleet is stubby, and all of the Js are stretch.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 2:10 am 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 12:26 am
Posts: 382
Location: Winterpeg
Didn't we get two stretched H models in the mid-late 90's?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:54 pm 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:53 am
Posts: 391
Location: Trenton
Yes. All the other ones are stubby, hence 'most'.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:48 pm 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:40 pm
Posts: 948
Location: YXL
What do they use to xfer fuel - pneumatic or hydraulic pumps --


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:11 am 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:23 am
Posts: 358
I think each underwing refueling pod has its own RAT, and the transfer pumps are electric.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:01 pm 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:40 pm
Posts: 948
Location: YXL
So are you saying that there are no internal tanks used for the air to air refueling and that all that fuel is carried in the external pod tanks - it would be interesting to know how the system works and is setup and was it some of that plumbing that caused the fire -- or it was a guy smoking sitting on the crapper -- lmfaooooooo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:37 am 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 12:26 am
Posts: 382
Location: Winterpeg
Been about 14 years since I operated one, so might not have this exactly correct.

Cdn C130 tankers usually have a large tank in the cargo compartment that is plumbed into the aircraft fuel system and can hold about 23000 lbs fuel. There is also an external fuel tank on each wing between the engines. Total fuel capacity with the fuselage tank installed is about 85000 lbs.

There are two high capacity transfer pumps in the fuselage tank allowing high offload rates to receivers. The refuelling pods outboard of #1 and #4 engines do not contain any fuel. They hold the refuellling hoses & drogues. IIRC, with a steady lineup of receivers, you can offload about 60000 lbs in less than 15 minutes.

Refuelling system is operated by the flight engineer from the cockpit. Two crew members serve as monitors at the paradoor windows because once the receivers move into position they can't be seen from the cockpit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:46 pm 
Offline
Rank 5
Rank 5

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:23 am
Posts: 358
Liquid Charlie wrote:
So are you saying that there are no internal tanks used for the air to air refueling and that all that fuel is carried in the external pod tanks - it would be interesting to know how the system works and is setup and was it some of that plumbing that caused the fire -- or it was a guy smoking sitting on the crapper -- lmfaooooooo


No, I did not say that. Those wing pods contain the hose, drogue, and RAT powered pump. The fuel for transfer to other aircraft is contained in stainless steel tanks in the cargo hold. Caveat: I have never been on a Herc squadron, so maybe somebody with direct knowledge can add more detail.


Edit: sorry, did not read the post above before posting this. :prayer:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:24 pm 
Offline
Rank 8
Rank 8
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:40 pm
Posts: 948
Location: YXL
Thanks Guys --


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:57 am 
Offline
Rank 2
Rank 2

Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 3:16 am
Posts: 76
azimuthaviation: I'm fairly certian it hasn't.

And an fyi the hercs can operate with a fuse tank, but to my knowledge they rarely do because the fuse tanks total capacity is roughly equal to the capacity of the externals and they can not have fuel in both so it doesnt make much sense to use the fuse tanks. How ever the plumbing for the fuse tank does run throughout the aircraft, but I would put money down that it had nothing to do with this incident.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:01 pm 
Offline
Rank 0
Rank 0

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:09 pm
Posts: 8
bigbert wrote:
azimuthaviation: I'm fairly certian it hasn't.

And an fyi the hercs can operate with a fuse tank, but to my knowledge they rarely do because the fuse tanks total capacity is roughly equal to the capacity of the externals and they can not have fuel in both so it doesnt make much sense to use the fuse tanks. How ever the plumbing for the fuse tank does run throughout the aircraft, but I would put money down that it had nothing to do with this incident.


Having worked on this particular aircraft (and all Canadian Hercs for that matter) countless times during my tour in Trenton, ON in the 90's I can say with some authority that the Herc tankers (338 thru 342) do in fact operate with the fuselage tank installed when configured for AAR missions (as it was in this incident). The comment about not being able to have fuel in both the fuselage tank and the externals simultaneously is simply incorrect.

The fuselage tank had absolutely nothing to do with this incident, in fact it was not fuel related at all.

The incident aircraft had just completed an AAR mission and was conducting a touch and go for training. The fire occurred immediately after rotation while the aircraft was still only just a few feet off the ground. The loadmaster called for an abort and the aircraft was able to stop within the remaining runway. Had the fire occurred a minute or two later we would most likely be having a completely different discussion.

While the official findings have not been released it is believed that a steel braided hyd hose chafed through a wire bundle near the aux hyd pump causing arcing which compromised an adjacent hyd line and ignited a fire. The initial fire was fed further when an oxygen line was subsequently compromised.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 


All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CFR, Ref Plus 10, TheStig and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

 
For questions/comments please send them to
webmaster@avcanada.ca


AvCanada Topsites List
AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com

While the administrators and moderators of this  forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as  quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. If you feel a  topic or post is inappropriate email us at support@avcanada.ca .  By reading these forums you acknowledge that  all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and  not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these  people) and hence will not be held liable. This website is not responsible or liable in any way for any false or misleading messages or job ads placed at our site.   

Use AvCanada's information at your own risk!

We reserve the right to remove any messages that we deem unacceptable.
  When you post a message, your IP is logged and may be provided to concerned parties where unethical or illegal  behavior is apparent. All rights reserved.