Budd says a bit about it in one of the old Grass Roots from 2000, the only online reference I found to it (and didn't approve of it), though there may be more - I didn't do an exaustive search. Its appeared a few other times in various magazine articles I've come across. I was bored the other day perusing airbum.com and thought about it again.
Link to the article
For those of you too lazy to click the link, the operative bit.
Thoughts?One of life's more esoteric factors that I don't understand is the so-called "happy feet" style of flying tailwheel airplanes. I know this isn't an Earth-shaking problem to the general population, but I spend so much time giving tail wheel instruction, that repairing the damage done by that style of flying has become a real thorn in my side. I know the concept of teaching "happy feet" is to get the student's feet moving back and forth the second the taildragger hits the ground so he isn't sitting there doing nothing. I've always felt you do something only when the airplane asks for it; you don't keep giving it inputs in the hopes they average out straight-ahead. If you're dancing with your feet, you have no idea what the airplane is doing or what it needs. 'Just doesn't make sense to me.







