Concorde - fascinating reading.

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5625
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Concorde - fascinating reading.

Post by North Shore »

Over on one of the 'other' forums, there's a thread on Concorde. All sorts of tech/handling/design questions answered by one of her pilots, f/e's, and avionics techs. If you are interested at all in Concorde, it's an interesting read..

a small teaser: in the 35 years that Concorde was operational, the RAF didn't have a plane in their inventory that could catch her.. (I would suspect that they still don't.)

http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/423988-c ... stion.html
---------- ADS -----------
 
Moose47
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1348
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:45 pm
Location: Home of Canada's Air Defence

Re: Concorde - fascinating reading.

Post by Moose47 »

G'day

Sorry North Shore but my beloved English Electric (later B.A.C.) Lightning could not only intercept the Concorde but also to the dismay of the Americans, intercept the Lockheed U-2.

During a British Airways trial, N.A.T.O. member nations were invited to attempt to intercept the Concorde. The only aircraft to succeed was a Lightning F.3 s/n XR749. It was flown by R.A.F. Flight Lieutenant Mike Hale. He described his aircraft as "a very hot ship, even for a Lightning". He pulled alongside the stunned British Airways crew at Mach 2.25."

Cheers...Chris
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Expat
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2383
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:58 am
Location: Central Asia

Re: Concorde - fascinating reading.

Post by Expat »

And we are ready to break the bank, and buy a bunch of Mach 1.6 CF-35? Where is the joke here?
The Russians and Chinese will eat us alive. :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5625
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Re: Concorde - fascinating reading.

Post by North Shore »

Chris/Moose,

Well, I stand corrected. (although, it was one, 'hot ship', specially prepped for the occasion..) I took that little bit from the PPRUNE thread, so perhaps I shouldn't believe everything I read online! :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
JDW
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 11:54 am
Location: CZBB-CYKZ

Re: Concorde - fascinating reading.

Post by JDW »

one of the guys on the pprune forum mentioned this concorde doc. found the link, figured id share

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmQic5E0v7w
---------- ADS -----------
 
126.7_STFU
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:22 am

Re: Concorde - fascinating reading.

Post by 126.7_STFU »

The F4 could very well have given the Concorde a run for its money.

And what the hell do F-35s have to do with a long retired supersonic jet airliner? I believe we have specific types of ordinance to take care of the speed problem? Is there a surplus of terrorist Concorde' over the arctic we need to shoot down?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
silent_pete
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:46 pm

Re: Concorde - fascinating reading.

Post by silent_pete »

126.7_STFU wrote:The F4 could very well have given the Concorde a run for its money.

And what the hell do F-35s have to do with a long retired supersonic jet airliner? I believe we have specific types of ordinance to take care of the speed problem? Is there a surplus of terrorist Concorde' over the arctic we need to shoot down?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Damn near spit my beer out on that one. Well done sir!

And Thanks North Shore for the info.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”