Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.
Moderators: Sulako , lilfssister , North Shore , ahramin , sky's the limit , sepia
AJV
Rank 4
Posts: 220 Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 12:30 pm
Post
by AJV » Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:11 pm
Light twin off the end of the runway into the bushes, no one hurt.
---------- ADS -----------
AJV
Rank 4
Posts: 220 Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 12:30 pm
Post
by AJV » Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:16 pm
how do you post pics on here?
---------- ADS -----------
AJV
Rank 4
Posts: 220 Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 12:30 pm
Post
by AJV » Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:22 pm
I think I got it
---------- ADS -----------
Attachments
front.jpg (126.4 KiB) Viewed 3215 times
AJV
Rank 4
Posts: 220 Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 12:30 pm
Post
by AJV » Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:23 pm
one more
---------- ADS -----------
Attachments
side.jpg (92.22 KiB) Viewed 3214 times
Shiny Side Up
Top Poster
Posts: 5335 Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Group W bench
Post
by Shiny Side Up » Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:38 pm
Airplane's home is in CYRP, registered to "Touch n' Go Aviation" according to the registry database.
---------- ADS -----------
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Posts: 3127 Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am
Post
by CpnCrunch » Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:49 pm
Seems a bit short of a runway to be landing a 310 on...I guess they were stopping there to save 10c on avgas. Anyway, glad nobody was hurt - could have been worse.
---------- ADS -----------
ahramin
Rank Moderator
Posts: 6206 Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver
Post
by ahramin » Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:40 pm
Wet runway.
---------- ADS -----------
AirFrame
Rank 10
Posts: 2256 Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Sidney, BC
Contact:
Post
by AirFrame » Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:43 pm
Can't see the second prop, but if it's as intact as the first prop, then neither engine was running when it stopped... Either that or it stopped against something and the props never touched ground. TWO overhauls would be expensive.
---------- ADS -----------
GUMPS
Rank 4
Posts: 208 Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:02 pm
Post
by GUMPS » Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:49 pm
Shiny Side Up wrote: Airplane's home is in CYRP, registered to "Touch n' Go Aviation" according to the registry database.
The joke's already there....
---------- ADS -----------
170 to xray
Rank 3
Posts: 138 Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:48 am
Location: cyyz
Post
by 170 to xray » Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:00 pm
---------- ADS -----------
ahramin
Rank Moderator
Posts: 6206 Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver
Post
by ahramin » Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:28 pm
Maybe it sold and that's the new owner off the end.
---------- ADS -----------
AirFrame
Rank 10
Posts: 2256 Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Sidney, BC
Contact:
Post
by AirFrame » Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:23 pm
Change the ad to say "Bush pilots look here!"
---------- ADS -----------
crazy_aviator
Rank 8
Posts: 917 Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:13 am
Post
by crazy_aviator » Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:51 pm
Touch and No Go aviation ?
---------- ADS -----------
Redneck_pilot86
Rank (9)
Posts: 1288 Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: between 60 and 70
Post
by Redneck_pilot86 » Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:24 pm
AirFrame wrote: Can't see the second prop, but if it's as intact as the first prop, then neither engine was running when it stopped... Either that or it stopped against something and the props never touched ground. TWO overhauls would be expensive.
Judging by all the leaves and crud on the aircraft in the pic of the left engine, it was running when it went into the brush...
---------- ADS -----------
Rookie50
Rank (9)
Posts: 1819 Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:00 am
Location: Clear of the Active.
Post
by Rookie50 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:46 am
Ouch. Both props and engines pretty low time. Double Ouch actually.
---------- ADS -----------
J31
Rank (9)
Posts: 1087 Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 7:21 am
Post
by J31 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:29 am
CpnCrunch wrote: Seems a bit short of a runway to be landing a 310 on...I guess they were stopping there to save 10c on avgas. Anyway, glad nobody was hurt - could have been worse.
1800 feet of wet asphalt in a C310R? Hmmm...a bit of a challenge.
---------- ADS -----------
HighT5
Rank 2
Posts: 60 Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:22 am
Post
by HighT5 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:45 pm
Is that one of Seneca's old 310s from the 80s?
---------- ADS -----------
CFR
Rank 8
Posts: 780 Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:51 pm
Location: CYAV
Post
by CFR » Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:58 pm
HighT5 wrote: Is that one of Seneca's old 310s from the 80s?
The registry shows it as being imported in 2009.
---------- ADS -----------
godsrcrazy
Rank 8
Posts: 798 Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:12 pm
Post
by godsrcrazy » Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:01 pm
HighT5 wrote: Is that one of Seneca's old 310s from the 80s?
Manufactured in 1979 according to the registry.
---------- ADS -----------