WPPA.ca

Discuss topics relating to Westjet.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

JSYK
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:34 am

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by JSYK »

Realitychex wrote:This is a tough one.

Everyone wants to see their paycheck increase every year. I would imagine those that chose to max out on the stock program have seen just that over the past year or so.

The bigger picture is the 800lb gorilla sitting in the corner.

As costs go up.....all costs......, the opportunity for an ULCC in Canada becomes greater and greater.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/spirit-ai ... 00044.html

Jetsgo was a very poorly thought out and executed attempt at a ULCC, but its existence in the marketplace was a major PITA for WJ and materially impacted its earnings for a couple of years.

It would be the height of arrogance to believe it would be impossible for anyone to successfully launch a Spirit knock off in Canada. People thought the same when WJ launched in 1996 and look what it did to the incumbent operations at the time. Every single one went banco.

No easy answers here, but all involved need to pay very close attention to the end game.

The best way of ensuring long term job security is to maintain a unit cost base that precludes anyone slipping in underneath you.

8)

As I am sure you have heard by now RealityChex, the pilots at WJ were only looking for COLA and are irritated by a large number of "flexibility" changes which reduce their working conditions. There are numerous concessionary items in the proposed Agreement and no material gains. None of how it has been handled is anything like it how it was when you were with us. There is a different management ethos at work.

If you look at how much of CASM pilot cost is at WestJet compared to pretty much every other carrier in North America, it becomes apparent that WestJet pilots are more than contributing their part to the success of the Company.

To frame the "friction" going on at WestJet with their pilots as being about money is missing 90% of the picture.

WPPA is just an option for pilots to consider. It would be not much different than WJPA is in a material sense to the Company, it would just codify things. Flexibility would still be there. It shares the same values and desires for the Company's long term success. It is entirely an initiative conducted internally.
---------- ADS -----------
 
North Shore
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 5620
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
Location: Straight outta Dundarave...

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by North Shore »

The best way of ensuring long term job security is to maintain a unit cost base that precludes anyone slipping in underneath you.
You mean that there's people out there who'd sit in the LHS of a Q400 for less than ~ $60k?! :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyer 1492
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 561
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:55 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by flyer 1492 »

North Shore wrote:
The best way of ensuring long term job security is to maintain a unit cost base that precludes anyone slipping in underneath you.
You mean that there's people out there who'd sit in the LHS of a Q400 for less than ~ $60k?! :shock:
There will be once the hiring stops at WJ. :lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
justwork
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 482
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 7:59 am
Location: East Coast

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by justwork »

flyer 1492 wrote:
North Shore wrote:
The best way of ensuring long term job security is to maintain a unit cost base that precludes anyone slipping in underneath you.
You mean that there's people out there who'd sit in the LHS of a Q400 for less than ~ $60k?! :shock:
There will be once the hiring started at WJE. :lol:
I fixed that for you.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Realitychex
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 552
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:37 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by Realitychex »

There have been countless times in WJ's history where WJ's profits, margins and presumably the share price could have been significantly higher than reported had they simply maintained status quo and let the market grow into the capacity added.

That concept was floated by more than one Bay St / Wall St analyst in the past.

I suspect 3Q 2013 will be a further example of this.

Standing in a puddle is no way to grow a business.

8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
CAL
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1376
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:47 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by CAL »

did you guys get a nasty memo or something? no posts in 5 days :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flying Nutcracker
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 469
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:14 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by Flying Nutcracker »

Father Clive told us to give our head a shake... So we are shaking our heads!
---------- ADS -----------
 
7thirtyseven
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 190
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:05 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by 7thirtyseven »

Im in cult detox, cant comment till I finish the programme in fact Im not even supposed to have access to th... Ohh crap see ya. :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
CAL
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1376
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:47 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by CAL »

1100 plus guys and no posts in 6 days......somebody said something...funny world
---------- ADS -----------
 
Oleo 4
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:18 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by Oleo 4 »

Nothing has been said!

Management has been supportive of us getting the facts and determining what is right or wrong for us at this time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
albatross
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 3:12 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by albatross »

Now THAT is a joke of a statement.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Oleo 4
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:18 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by Oleo 4 »

I stand by my words!



We have other avenues to openly discuss our TA and/or any WPPA rhetoric. This is not the place!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
twinpratts
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1620
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:38 am
Location: The Wild Wild West.
Contact:

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by twinpratts »

+1 Oleo.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Optimus Prime
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:51 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by Optimus Prime »

+1 Oleo

-1 Albatross
---------- ADS -----------
 
Jimmy_Hoffa
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:46 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by Jimmy_Hoffa »

Does this sound familiar to anyone ??
DollarShaveClub wrote:I don't know any background information, but I hear pilots are unhappy with contracts. Can someone please explain in layman's terms what this all means?
snag wrote:Pilots: "Can we have more pilot candy?"

Company: "No! Go to your room."
---------- ADS -----------
 
bearinmind
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by bearinmind »

Best thing that can happen for this union is a yes vote. It will send all the no voters straight ahead for certification. The actual language will be different form what the "yes" voters think they voted on and it will take a small percentage to be swayed to get 50% +1. Is it too early to welcome WestJet to Canada's unionized pilots?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Impact
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:28 am

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by Impact »

bearinmind wrote:Best thing that can happen for this union is a yes vote. It will send all the no voters straight ahead for certification. The actual language will be different form what the "yes" voters think they voted on and it will take a small percentage to be swayed to get 50% +1. Is it too early to welcome WestJet to Canada's unionized pilots?
Nice try. :lol:

A big reason why the vast majority of guys wanted to get on with WJ is because it's a non-union company. Most of us have seen the toxic and corrupt environment that a union breeds. No thanks. Been there, and never want to go back.

What's interesting as well, is the lack of the word "union" by the WPPA promoters. Why is that? :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2783
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by yycflyguy »

How would a union (other than being certified) be different from your existing "association"?
---------- ADS -----------
 
JSYK
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:34 am

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by JSYK »

A big reason why the vast majority of guys wanted to get on with WJ is because it's a non-union company. Most of us have seen the toxic and corrupt environment that a union breeds. No thanks. Been there, and never want to go back.

What's interesting as well, is the lack of the word "union" by the WPPA promoters. Why is that? :wink:
Sure, yup, thats the reason… whatever makes you feel good man…. :rolleyes:

Hung up on a word on which you obviously do not understand?

How come WJPA lacks the word "union"?

How come ACPA lacks the word "union"?

How come ALPA lacks the word "union"?

How come the word "union" is so important but the reality of anything isn't to some of you? I guess that kook-aid is a true narcotic after all.

Don't worry "Impact"(In PACT?), withdrawal might be painful but eventually you'll recover.

Ignorance/stupidity reflected in this type of comment above(it's obviously not a genuine question), illustrates the many difficult obstacles WJ pilots face in the pursuit for basic representation.
(edited upon reflection that it may be mis-interpreted by some. Sorry if it offended anyone. :oops: )
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by JSYK on Thu Nov 14, 2013 12:36 am, edited 3 times in total.
JSYK
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:34 am

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by JSYK »

yycflyguy wrote:How would a union (other than being certified) be different from your existing "association"?
It's the certification that makes all the difference! The existing "Association" is nothing, legally. Firstly, it's just the 7 pilots who are "PACT Reps"(out of 150) who chose a name one day. Certification requires that there would be Duty of Fair Representation and legal obligations to their members. Existing Association has no such obligation and in fact has the obligation to put the wishes of the Company first.

WPPA will be at arm's length, self funded (vs Company) and exclusive to the pilots, not a just a subcommittee of a Company UNION, as PACT is. It would be autonomous. Presently, all communications of any substance (not a golf tournament) are only distributed by the VP of Operations. All voting processes would be done EXTERNALLY and verifiably through a licensed accounting firm so that either the Company or any pilot could audit the results. Also, finances would be solely controlled by the pilot group, not the FAs, AMEs, CSAs, etc and fully transparent.

Certification brings with it actual rights & protections NOT AVAILABLE when you are a pretend "Association" (aka "Yellow UNION") which don't exist in the Labour Code. There would be an actual dispute resolution mechanism, by third party experts in aviation labour issues, whose decisions would be binding on BOTH the Company and the pilots.

Then, any newly negotiated Pilot Agreement(Collective Bargaining Agreement) would actually be a legally binding document not changeable without mutual consent. At present, the current "Pilot Agreement" is legally only a Company Policy leaflet. All negotiations would have to be conducted based on survey data driven mandates not the whims of the friends of management, as WJPA now only attracts as "representatives". Permission to get outside advice/consultation would not require the permission of the VP of OPS either and the money from PACT. Representatives would be safe from intimidation or threats if they disagree with the Company (dark history in that area).

Most basic of all, there would be a right to just cause in matters of discipline/discharge. Upgrade bypassing would be subject to process & appeal not management subjectivity or bias. Pro-standards, Pilot Assistance, Flight Safety committees will be set up that will work WITH management but not FOR it.

UNLIKE PACT/WJPA, the WPPA would be legally obligated to follow it's Constitution. Please have a look at it. wppa.ca
(Nothing to fear, heck, even the same guys in WJPA now could run for election in it, the first order of business when certification is granted.)

There is so much more but, unfortunately, the word "union" causes severe short circuiting in those who've O D 'd on Kool-aid. So, this may take awhile for enough to understand.


PS: never call those people who buy tickets "passengers", you will be chastised severely, forever :prayer:
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4111
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by rudder »

The SWA pilots formed a union many,many years ago. Did it destroy the company? Hardly. As a matter of fact, quite the opposite. And unless I am mistaken almost every other airline pilot in Canada is unionized albeit under a myriad of different representational banners.

Some of you union haters need to get over yourselves. The apocalypse is not coming. Structure and rules and democracy and fairness are not bad things. The union will be what you make it. If it is populated by backwards thinking neanderthals then you can imagine the result. If it is instead populated by your best and brightest thinkers, then you will find that it may become a source of vitality and ideas in a very turbulent industry.

It will be what you make it. And if the concept of one man = one vote bothers you, then you have bigger problems than the union drive debate.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2783
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by yycflyguy »

JSYK wrote:
yycflyguy wrote:How would a union (other than being certified) be different from your existing "association"?
It's the certification that makes all the difference! The existing "Association" is nothing, legally. Firstly, it's just the 7 pilots who are "PACT Reps"(out of 150) who chose a name one day. Certification requires that there would be Duty of Fair Representation and legal obligations to their members. Existing Association has no such obligation and in fact has the obligation to put the wishes of the Company first.
So what you are saying then is that all your previous negotiated CBAs did not have the collective membership's best interests at heart? It was simply agreements to satisfy corporate direction?
WPPA will be at arm's length, self funded (vs Company) and exclusive to the pilots, not a just a subcommittee of a Company UNION, as PACT is. It would be autonomous. Presently, all communications of any substance (not a golf tournament) are only distributed by the VP of Operations. All voting processes would be done EXTERNALLY and verifiably through a licensed accounting firm so that either the Company or any pilot could audit the results. Also, finances would be solely controlled by the pilot group, not the FAs, AMEs, CSAs, etc and fully transparent.
The current associations cost are fronted by the company? Wild.
How is the current association NOT autonomous?
Certification brings with it actual rights & protections NOT AVAILABLE when you are a pretend "Association" (aka "Yellow UNION") which don't exist in the Labour Code. There would be an actual dispute resolution mechanism, by third party experts in aviation labour issues, whose decisions would be binding on BOTH the Company and the pilots.
Careful with that one. We just had a FOS forced on us after the corporation failed to bargain in good faith and government intervention which stripped any industrial action. Under this federal government, your "right" to bargain in good faith is all smoke and mirrors.
Then, any newly negotiated Pilot Agreement(Collective Bargaining Agreement) would actually be a legally binding document not changeable without mutual consent. At present, the current "Pilot Agreement" is legally only a Company Policy leaflet. All negotiations would have to be conducted based on survey data driven mandates not the whims of the friends of management, as WJPA now only attracts as "representatives". Permission to get outside advice/consultation would not require the permission of the VP of OPS either and the money from PACT. Representatives would be safe from intimidation or threats if they disagree with the Company (dark history in that area).

Most basic of all, there would be a right to just cause in matters of discipline/discharge. Upgrade bypassing would be subject to process & appeal not management subjectivity or bias. Pro-standards, Pilot Assistance, Flight Safety committees will be set up that will work WITH management but not FOR it.

UNLIKE PACT/WJPA, the WPPA would be legally obligated to follow it's Constitution. Please have a look at it. wppa.ca
(Nothing to fear, heck, even the same guys in WJPA now could run for election in it, the first order of business when certification is granted.)

There is so much more but, unfortunately, the word "union" causes severe short circuiting in those who've O D 'd on Kool-aid. So, this may take awhile for enough to understand.


PS: never call those people who buy tickets "passengers", you will be chastised severely, forever :prayer:
Let me ask you this. Does the existing association have an industrial action committee? A group that understands how to apply pressure for collective gains legally under Canadian Labour Law and CARs?
---------- ADS -----------
 
JSYK
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:34 am

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by JSYK »

So what you are saying then is that all your previous negotiated CBAs did not have the collective membership's best interests at heart? It was simply agreements to satisfy corporate direction?
You are still confused. You cannot have a Collective Bargaining Agreement(CBA) with out certified representation. The proposed, current and previous "Agreements" are just the pilot specific Company policies dressed up to look like a traditional pilot contract. WJPA has no "agency of authority" to negotiate anything on behalf of anyone, legally. Anything in any pilot "Agreement" at WJ is amendable at the will of the Company WITHOUT RECOURSE for the "Association". While WJ pilots have done well in overall compensation, at the highest levels of the pay scale, and finally obtained reasonable benefits, it can be demonstrated(in fact, I know it to be true) this occurred because of the THREAT of unionization and the previous founders & CEOs irrational fears of such. It always comes down to two things to managers, money and control. WJ was willing to give a bit more money, very unevenly I might add, to maintain tighter control over all policy. Look past the top Captain pay scale. Look at the rest of what is in these "Agreements", they are laughable to anyone who understands labour representation. WestJet has most subjective and draconian Upgrade process I have ever seen among any and all Airlines across this industry. I don't see anyone else demanding an FO accept their non-appealable fate then having to sign a humiliating letter or "they will offered the option of terminating their employment with WestJet".

The current associations cost are fronted by the company? Wild.
True! Employees pay $2.50 per cheque but that comes nowhere near the costs incurred. In fact, a very good portion of that money is just accumulating in a bank account, for reasons unknown. The top two Pilot Reps get nearly full pay from the Company plus they can bill overtime. They get stipends and sometimes confirmed pass travel for themselves and their families for vacation at least once a year. Its all in a document called the "PACT MoA". PACT has no legal standing whatsoever. It is not a corporation, not a registered trade union, not some sort of non-profit and certainly not a person. SO, it cannot own any assets (there is no WJPA bank account, just a PACT one) it cannot be sued or held liable for any actions. Have a look at the PACT BoD Rep's pay in the AGM circulars over the last several years. Thats all paid by the Company. Offices, meeting space, equipment and communications are all provided for and remain under the control of the Company. I think they have their own "imPACT" pens and tote bags though. :lol: But, even those are property & copyright of WestJet.
How is the current association NOT autonomous?
I think much of what has been posted about PACT/WJPA should make that pretty obvious? They almost never meet without management present. Again, they are obligated to put the Company's interests first and they are still acting as employees bound by the Business Code of Conduct while doing "Association" work.

Careful with that one. We just had a FOS forced on us after the corporation failed to bargain in good faith and government intervention which stripped any industrial action. Under this federal government, your "right" to bargain in good faith is all smoke and mirrors.
Many of us intimately know all about what happens over at AC world. We have countless friends, relatives even spouses there. Who can know what happens in the macro-picture, its a political world. But, those politics swing back and forth over time. Air Canada is a unique situation, ACPPA means you still are a bit different type of Corporation. Lots of history. Powerful, very deep rooted politics & lobbying involved. Potential re-entry into bankruptcy was touted. Those were all factors in why you ended up in that situation. Remember, we were the bar for Rouge narrow body WACON too. SO, I think its in your best interest to see us do better.

IF WPPA and Company reach an impasse on a first collective agreement, I am pretty confident that any arbitrator will compare us to you as primary competitor more and not Canadian North as much as present management does here(who define the whole compensation process without any verification by our "Association").

Its not all about one big negotiation every few years, representation is about a lot of little details everyday. Those of you with REAL representation should not take for granted the most basic rights you have. I don't think basic third party arbitration, especially on matters of contract adherence or discipline is "smoke and mirrors".
Let me ask you this. Does the existing association have an industrial action committee? A group that understands how to apply pressure for collective gains legally under Canadian Labour Law and CARs?
Nope! Dude, the present "Association" isn't even a real kindergarten yet and you are talking undergraduate studies… :lol:
However, WPPA will have lots of committees(not just 7 super best friends of management) and no doubt some will deal with matters of professional & labour rights (I'll volunteer for that one myself!) and we won't need the VP of Ops permission to participate or get threatened for "talking to others" anymore.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Optimus Prime
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 3:51 pm

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by Optimus Prime »

JSYK wrote:
Sure, yup, thats the reason… whatever makes you feel good man…. :rolleyes:

Hung up on a word on which you obviously do not understand?

How come WJPA lacks the word "union"?

How come ACPA lacks the word "union"?

How come ALPA lacks the word "union"?

How come the word "union" is so important but the reality of anything isn't to some of you? I guess that kook-aid is a true narcotic after all.

Don't worry "Impact"(In PACT?), withdrawal might be painful but eventually you'll recover.

Ignorance/stupidity is the most difficult obstacle WJ pilots face in the pursuit for basic representation.

Man, the arrogance in your posts is overwhelming. Not surprising though.

It's pretty transparent to anyone stuck up front and forced to listen to the "certify" spiel that the WPPA is not about legal representation or working conditions or anything else they yell at their helpless captive audience. These guys want you to believe that they have the pilot group's best interest in mind. But, like anyone else who thinks they're smarter than you, they reveal the truth in bits and pieces. They are senior enough that should the company falter, layoffs will not effect them. They have made enough money through WestJet already, that should the company fail, their families will not suffer. A cushy schedule, buckets of money, and bitterness is what this is about.

Oh, and Just So You Know, if you're trying to convince a group of something, it's probably not the best idea to insult and alienate the entire group. I appreciate it though, I'll be directing my colleagues to this thread so they can see what our heroes at the WPPA really think of us. Just So They Know.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JSYK
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:34 am

Re: WPPA.ca

Post by JSYK »

Man, the arrogance in your posts is overwhelming. Not surprising though.

It's pretty transparent to anyone stuck up front and forced to listen to the "certify" spiel that the WPPA is not about legal representation or working conditions or anything else they yell at their helpless captive audience. These guys want you to believe that they have the pilot group's best interest in mind. But, like anyone else who thinks they're smarter than you, they reveal the truth in bits and pieces. They are senior enough that should the company falter, layoffs will not effect them. They have made enough money through WestJet already, that should the company fail, their families will not suffer. A cushy schedule, buckets of money, and bitterness is what this is about.

Oh, and Just So You Know, if you're trying to convince a group of something, it's probably not the best idea to insult and alienate the entire group. I appreciate it though, I'll be directing my colleagues to this thread so they can see what our heroes at the WPPA really think of us. Just So They Know.
Lets see if facts have any relevance anymore. Not holding my breath for SOME of you that choose the path of ignorance. I am more certain everyday that isn't a majority by any stretch though. Most pilots at WestJet are very sensible & logical once provided with the facts, they will be able to see the need to change the representation system, BUT there is a gestapo of those who spread ignorance, lies and even defamation, hard at work and everyone knows it. They are the ones brow-beating and creating a constant low level anxiety and fear in our group. So, I think you have that backwards my friend. I am sure even the mention of support of something so evil as internal certification would result in a quick trip to the Chief Pilot's office or maybe even the CEO's? Even though that would be illegal, under those pesky Labour Laws, I am sure that's okee dokee by you, eh? And, that pilot would be all on their own to fight it afterwards. Because… there is no representation!

Oh yes, certification will make "the company falter", just like at has at SouthWest! All the senior pilots just want the company to fail, yup! you got it pegged man! :rolleyes:
You're kinda proving my point, aren't you? :wink:

From listening to the current TA & anti-certification rhetoric, logic is clearly in short supply now. Spin, spin, even out right lying from a fake representation system in the Company's back pocket and guys like you think the alternative, which all WestJet pilots can build, from scratch, is the boogeyman. Wow! Pretty clear where the arrogance is.

The WPPA is about the Constitution and using the appropriate laws of Canada to provide basic rights to the pilots at WestJet. Something they DO NOT HAVE NOW. Nor can ever achieve under a Company UNION like PACT (and it's little subcommittee the WJPA). No, it cannot stop traditional airline managers, like we have now, from repeating the same mistakes which cause problems for an airline down the road but SERIOUSLY, you think PACT/WJPA can? If they give away the farm like this when we are doing well, I can't imagine how far they'd bend if there even was one bad quarter? If you think the employees, let alone the pilots have anything to do with why airlines go broke then you truly don't understand a thing about this industry!

Your conjecture or speculation about "motives" is typical WestJet protocol of "attack the messenger when you cannot fight the truth". They train PACT Reps to do this.
Reality is, WPPA is not run by anyone right now, beyond what is required to meet the Code. Why don't you run for election in it when certification happens? Unless, you're not allowed because you are a manager?(or soon will be by publicly sucking up sufficiently) Then you can be sure none of those fabled "bitter" guys don't blow up YOUR Company. (Most guys who seem to think they have the licence on Teal seem to think it's THIER Company and anyone who disagrees with them should leave. Now officially stated in annual ground training as the "Get off the bus" speech, talk about the epitome of arrogance!)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by JSYK on Wed Nov 13, 2013 5:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Post Reply

Return to “WestJet”