Cox Air Resources Ltd.

This forum has been developed to discuss Bush Flying & Specialty Air Service topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore, Rudder Bug

Post Reply
gapper
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:02 pm

Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by gapper »

I've been reading from The De Havilland Canada Story..author Fred W. Hotson, and came across a mention of a company in Edmonton, Cox Air Resources Ltd. Its stated that they were converting the Piston Otter to a turbine conversion, sometime in the early 1980's.If anyone has any information to share with us, and possibly some pictures that would sure be appreciated.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-that principle is contempt prior to investigation." -Herbert Spencer
User avatar
Driving Rain
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: At a Tanker Base near you.
Contact:

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by Driving Rain »

A little off the topic but speaking of Turbine Otters...
Back it the 1970's the OMNR's Ontario Provincial Air Service thought very seriously about converting single Otters to turbine powered. They went so far as to engineer the drawings to do such a conversion in house at Sault Ste. Marie. When I was hired the drawings were still in the office.
I asked some of the old timers why they hadn't pursued it.
Apparently it was politics. DeHaviland was in the business of manufacturing and selling Twin Otters and they told the Ontario Gumitup of the day that they would refuse to support the aircraft after conversion. At the time the OMNR fleet included 24 otters, and they ( DeHav) wanted to sell them Twins.
Their 1340 powered otters on EDO water bombing floats could carry about 300 lb's more to a range of 600 miles than their 300 series Twins on CAP water bombing floats, all be it slower.
The engineers told me that the converted otter could be modified to carry 450 imp gallon water bombing floats. That's the same load as the as their twins now carry on amphibs.
The single otter was a great little water bomber on low to medium intensity fires. It had a mini 215 drop pattern.

In the end, I'm glad DeHaviland pressured the government to not convert right after
the OMNR bought their first two CL-215's in 1981 and I've benefited.... [another story. :mrgreen: ]

I can't be sure but I think the OMNR sold their drawings and what ever else they'd done on the otter to Cox in 1975 or so.
It really wasn't until DeHavilnd kicked their old designs loose that modifications to turbine really started to take off. A great way for DeHaviland to reduce to zero product liability on old designs while forging ahead on newer.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Driving Rain on Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
hoghead
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:49 pm

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by hoghead »

I remember seeing the Cox DHC 3 frame at Boeing Field in 88/89 minus wings, tail and engine. I hope it helps, I did get a look at it when he had it in YXD in 79 (I think).
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by Cat Driver »

In 1971 Ray Cox and I recovered CF-BZI one of NWT's DC3's off Summerset Island and flew it to Resolute bay just before Christmas.

Took us fifty nine days to get it flying, most of the time in twenty fours a day in darkness.

BZI is now in Calgary parked in the museum, I still stop to look at it and remember how difficult the recovery was.

Ray started the Otter turbine conversion after that and I can't remember if he ever actually finished it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
User avatar
GA MX Trainer Dude
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by GA MX Trainer Dude »

First aircraft was CF-MES - Ex Gateway Airline aircraft.

Info here:

http://flythebush.blogspot.com/2007/05/ ... es_12.html

I met Ray about 1980 or thereabouts and remember him as a very confident and competent person - He must have been devastated at the final outcome.

He like so many others paved the way for the followers - yet received no credit for the foresight of a turbine powered Otter aircraft that we pretty much take for granted today. It might be a long time after the events but acknowledgement for the concept really needs to go to Ray.

MX
---------- ADS -----------
 
You can train a monkey to ride a bicycle but you can't train it to fix it!!!
Byroncox
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:21 pm

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by Byroncox »

Are you still looking for info. My father is still in Seattle.
Email me byron.cox@me.com
---------- ADS -----------
 
P180
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:29 am
Location: north of 60

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by P180 »

Driving Rain wrote:A little off the topic but speaking of Turbine Otters...
Back it the 1970's the OMNR's Ontario Provincial Air Service thought very seriously about converting single Otters to turbine powered. They went so far as to engineer the drawings to do such a conversion in house at Sault Ste. Marie. When I was hired the drawings were still in the office.
I asked some of the old timers why they hadn't pursued it.
Apparently it was politics. DeHaviland was in the business of manufacturing and selling Twin Otters and they told the Ontario Gumitup of the day that they would refuse to support the aircraft after conversion. At the time the OMNR fleet included 24 otters, and they ( DeHav) wanted to sell them Twins.
Their 1340 powered otters on EDO water bombing floats could carry about 300 lb's more to a range of 600 miles than their 300 series Twins on CAP water bombing floats, all be it slower.
The engineers told me that the converted otter could be modified to carry 450 imp gallon water bombing floats. That's the same load as the as their twins now carry on amphibs.
The single otter was a great little water bomber on low to medium intensity fires. It had a mini 215 drop pattern.

In the end, I'm glad DeHaviland pressured the government to not convert right after
the OMNR bought their first two CL-215's in 1981 and I've benefited.... [another story. :mrgreen: ]

I can't be sure but I think the OMNR sold their drawings and what ever else they'd done on the otter to Cox in 1975 or so.
It really wasn't until DeHavilnd kicked their old designs loose that modifications to turbine really started to take off. A great way for DeHaviland to reduce to zero product liability on old designs while forging ahead on newer.
Well I flew for the MNR for 25 years and this is the first I have ever heard of it but I will ask around about it..
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
CamAero
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 272
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:27 am

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by CamAero »

Driving Rain wrote: The engineers told me that the converted otter could be modified to carry 450 imp gallon water bombing floats.
4500 lbs?

That doesn't sound quite right.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rowdy
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5166
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: On Borrowed Wings

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by Rowdy »

CamAero wrote:
Driving Rain wrote: The engineers told me that the converted otter could be modified to carry 450 imp gallon water bombing floats.
4500 lbs?

That doesn't sound quite right.
Remember.. HA and a few others fly the otter around at 9000lbs with passengers/bags/fuel on a daily basis… Now remove all of those lawsuits from the airframe and make it water. Seems plausible from that standpoint.

What do Conair/airspray operate their convairs/electras at? how far above the standard MTOW are they operated with a load on?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Driving Rain
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: At a Tanker Base near you.
Contact:

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by Driving Rain »

Well I flew for the MNR for 25 years and this is the first I have ever heard of it but I will ask around about it..[/quote]


I flew for them for 30 years.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Driving Rain
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:10 pm
Location: At a Tanker Base near you.
Contact:

Re: Cox Air Resources Ltd.

Post by Driving Rain »

CamAero wrote:
Driving Rain wrote: The engineers told me that the converted otter could be modified to carry 450 imp gallon water bombing floats.
4500 lbs?

That doesn't sound quite right.
A piston Otter can legally carry more than a 300 series twin otter if both are fuelled for max range.
Dump the heavy radial, install a light PT6 and it is do able. Of course not for the entire mission.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Bush Flying & Specialty Air Service”