Colonel Sanders wrote:I keep saying ...
Pilots need a union - not a college, or university,
or Master's degrees in "life experience".
The mission of the union would be to stop pilots
from undercutting each other. No "work for free".
No "Left seat on an RJ for $50k".
Sorry, but if I'm happy flying for 35K, why the hell would I want a union to block me from accepting the job? Maybe I don't have kids, or married, have money in the bank and rrsps, paid off car, and live a very simple life.
Pilots need a masters degree, yes, or something else to fall back on. The reason they are undercutting each other is they probably have no other option but to take that RJ/King Air job at ANY wage. Second, where will the money come from for higher wages? Since most flights are relatively thin margins, and most travellers are very sensitive to ticket prices, ?(ie: not a necessity to take the family to Disneyland) raising fares won't work.
If consumers can support higher fares, they would be already be in place right now. Airlines are extremely smart at knowing what the market will support. Forcing the industry to pay X for a RJ crew means cancelled flights and job losses, for the benefit of those who get to keep their job (like a typical union). It will mean only those who need to fly, will. The trend is to LOWER ticket prices to fill every seat...I can't see wages going up any time soon since every single airline you see starting today is a low(er) cost carrier.
In the bigger picture, CS, the problem is too many applicants in a industry that doesn't have a lot of money to go around. If a person knows what they are getting into, there should be no reason for disappointment regarding wages and industry direction. Writing was on the wall ten years ago.