xsbank wrote:It's like that old joke, "Please God, I want to win the lottery!" "Meet me halfway, buy a ticket!"
Supercharged, what sort of person would you like to fly you? Detail-oriented, checks his work, gets it correct, does his research to learn his subject?
You seem to prefer someone who is lazy, slapdash, feckless, irresponsible, sloppy?
At the risk of repetition, pilots don't have to be formally educated, but they have to have many of the attributes of the educated. They have to be dedicated, detail-oriented, conscientious, prudent and have the ability to analyze and make a decision. How else, from a selection of 100 or so pilots standing in front of you, do you find the one or two that will be good employees? Have you got weeks to get to know them all? Usually, you would eliminate all those who dress funny or don't groom themselves. Then you would eliminate all that can't speak your language. Then you would eliminate all those who don't have the experience you need. Etc etc.
You can do this faster with a resume and a cover that you can read.
So, if your resume is scruffy, covered with errors, over-complicated etc., it gets eliminated. It won't be read at all.
It's your choice.
I understand, and agree to a point, if there is some silly little typo mistake, something like "I got by type rating at XYZ" vs "I got MY type rating at XYZ" that shouldn't change your opinion of a applicant.
Now if the entire CV is in texting lingo, "I went 2 flight school and would like to work 4 u" yeah, round bin it.
As a ATP/Instructor/Medic and real college grad, I'd like to think I'm a good catch for a employer and my current job seems to agree...that said, plenty of college educated folks who can write one heck of a CV who I wouldn't even trust to drive a lawn mower.
I'd pick a pilot based on the content of their CV (shy of huge grammatical errors), move up to a phone or face to face and go from there.