Companies that do not require Training bonds

Got a hot employment or interview tip to help a fellow aviator find a job or looking for a little job advice place your posting here.

Moderators: ahramin, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore

Message
Author
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#101 Post by Doc » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:16 pm

Removed as it is off topic and against what was requested by the original poster. If one of the companies was mentioned in error a simple comment saying so is all that is needed.
Thanks,
Bandaid.
---------- ADS -----------

User avatar
Rudder Bug
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2735
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:09 pm
Location: Right seat but I own the seat

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#102 Post by Rudder Bug » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:47 pm

'effin hippie wrote:Great River Air

Whitehorse/Dawson City. YT

NO bond.
Right on sir. I've even seen pilots being paid for the training.
---------- ADS -----------
Last edited by Rudder Bug on Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Flying an aircraft and building a guitar are two things that are easy to do bad and difficult to do right

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yd_QppdGks

User avatar
Rudder Bug
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2735
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:09 pm
Location: Right seat but I own the seat

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#103 Post by Rudder Bug » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:59 pm

No bond with Air Saguenay, the top-paying one in Québec (The Other Canada :mrgreen: ).
---------- ADS -----------
Flying an aircraft and building a guitar are two things that are easy to do bad and difficult to do right

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yd_QppdGks

chu me
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:48 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#104 Post by chu me » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:02 am

Deleted and added thanks everyone.

Chu me
---------- ADS -----------

timexd
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#105 Post by timexd » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:31 am

Kreos Aviation in Saskatoon has no bond or training agreement at the current time. Aircraft operated are Citation XLS, Citatio Ultra, Beech 350, and Beech 200.
---------- ADS -----------

whiteguy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1059
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: YYC

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#106 Post by whiteguy » Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:58 pm

North Cariboo has 1 year bond on the 200/1900 and 2 years on the Dash/ Jet.

CMA has bonds on the 1900 and the D328.
---------- ADS -----------

User avatar
Chaxterium
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 404
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:28 pm
Location: Probably in Africa

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#107 Post by Chaxterium » Sat Nov 06, 2010 6:22 am

I'm hearing Porter got rid of their bond entirely.
---------- ADS -----------

CJ3PILOT
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:54 am
Location: west of Toronto

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#108 Post by CJ3PILOT » Sun Nov 07, 2010 2:30 pm

whiteguy wrote:North Cariboo has 1 year bond on the 200/1900 and 2 years on the Dash/ Jet.

CMA has bonds on the 1900 and the D328.
Cariboos bond on the jet is 1 year.
---------- ADS -----------

Darkhorse
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: hotel

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#109 Post by Darkhorse » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:07 pm

Please take off Arctic Sunwest Charters.

I can positively say that they do have training bonds
---------- ADS -----------

CRJ705driver
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:11 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#110 Post by CRJ705driver » Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:39 am

How far back did Wasaya require conscripts to pay up front? I was thinking about 1993 to 1995 era when Frank Kelner was around....
Anybody who can remember that far back please let me know...
Thanks
---------- ADS -----------

jpar84
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:23 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#111 Post by jpar84 » Fri Nov 18, 2011 6:31 pm

Wabusk air CYMO if not already mentioned.
---------- ADS -----------

the AK
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:22 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#112 Post by the AK » Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:51 pm

Arctic Sunwest bond is two year 20 000 for a twin otter. so a person can see what type of place that is.
---------- ADS -----------

Ki-ll
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 177
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:16 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#113 Post by Ki-ll » Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:48 am

Airborne Energy has bonds for Navajo and Caravan. I do not know about 172s, but probably no bond there.
---------- ADS -----------

whiteguy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1059
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: YYC

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#114 Post by whiteguy » Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:40 am

CJ3PILOT wrote:
whiteguy wrote:North Cariboo has 1 year bond on the 200/1900 and 2 years on the Dash/ Jet.

CMA has bonds on the 1900 and the D328.
Cariboos bond on the jet is 1 year.
Sorry, I was referring to the BAE146. For the Ciatation and Challenger it's 1 year.

And now bonds for upgrades....
---------- ADS -----------

ea306
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:44 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#115 Post by ea306 » Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:31 am

Sunwing:
Employment Agreement - 24 Month Commitment
No Bond paid.
---------- ADS -----------

RickPilot33
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:21 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#116 Post by RickPilot33 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:33 pm

HEy Guys,

I would disagree,

CMA charges a working bond (12months or 10K) on B1900D
Starts from day you finish your PPC ride.
You do not get paid anything until you complete training

They have a bond or the Dornier as well but I think its 24m and 20k but I could be wrong

Canadian North also has a worth bond Dash 8 is 12m or 12K
or B737 is 18m or 18K

Good Luck all
---------- ADS -----------

airmikey1
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:30 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#117 Post by airmikey1 » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:38 am

HEllo .
COuld you update this email with 2013-14 figures of Companies in CANADA which do not required training bond. Thanks

Lots of help..

Mikey
---------- ADS -----------

User avatar
Superior Airways
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:19 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#118 Post by Superior Airways » Thu Jan 29, 2015 9:02 am

Superior Airways in NW Ontario do not require bonds for singles, BE58, PA31's and C208's including C208 Amphib. 208 drivers starting at 54k

Cheers!
---------- ADS -----------

User avatar
SundayDriver
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 2:55 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#119 Post by SundayDriver » Mon Mar 23, 2015 6:12 am

RickPilot33 wrote:HEy Guys,

I would disagree,

CMA charges a working bond (12months or 10K) on B1900D
Starts from day you finish your PPC ride.
You do not get paid anything until you complete training

They have a bond or the Dornier as well but I think its 24m and 20k but I could be wrong

Canadian North also has a worth bond Dash 8 is 12m or 12K
or B737 is 18m or 18K

Good Luck all
You don't get paid anything until you're done training???? People actually sign up for that?
---------- ADS -----------

Gorgons
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:47 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#120 Post by Gorgons » Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:17 pm

This thread has been pretty quite for sometime, he's a new twist.

Air Bravo, currently advertising for Captains. I was told they are firing FO's that are refusing to take offers of left seat positions, company wants a 10K bond signed and paid upfront.
---------- ADS -----------

fixnfly
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 4:21 am

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#121 Post by fixnfly » Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:25 pm

Gorgons wrote:This thread has been pretty quite for sometime, he's a new twist.

Air Bravo, currently advertising for Captains. I was told they are firing FO's that are refusing to take offers of left seat positions, company wants a 10K bond signed and paid upfront.
Yea I heard the same but was hesitant to believe that. Apparently the company is not doing well financially which might be part of the reason for requesting cash upfront. Problem is that you might never see that money again if the company goes under before your bond expires.
---------- ADS -----------

Gorgons
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:47 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#122 Post by Gorgons » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:14 pm

Operating two aircraft, one in Barrie and one in Thunder Bay. Only one medic in each location and they need Captains? Theres a message in there somewhere.
---------- ADS -----------

bigEh
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:14 pm

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#123 Post by bigEh » Tue Apr 25, 2017 2:31 pm

Alkan Air now requires a 12 month training agreement. No money changes hands unless you leave early.
---------- ADS -----------

User avatar
Chaxterium
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 404
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:28 pm
Location: Probably in Africa

Re: Companies that do not require Training bonds

#124 Post by Chaxterium » Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:53 pm

I know this may come as a shock to many people but Voyageur Airways no longer requires a bond.
---------- ADS -----------

Post Reply

Return to “Employment Forum”