Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

This forum has been developed to discuss flight instruction/University and College programs.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Right Seat Captain, lilfssister, North Shore

User avatar
Strega
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:44 am
Location: NWO

Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Strega »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4137
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by CpnCrunch »

It might have been better if they hadn't got confused in their call to ATC and ended up with the approach lights off. They ended up at 300ft with no runway in sight but the ground visible, and at 200ft they finally saw it but were quite a ways off centreline. Would have been much simpler if they'd just asked for the approach lights on like they were intending to do :)

Also, it's pretty easy to do when there isn't any turbulence. Try it when your 172 is bouncing about like a wild stallion and the KAP140 can't even manage to do the approach, and I'll be a bit more impressed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
eggy
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by eggy »

Wouldn't there have been a NOTAM stating PCL is u/s?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
cdnpilot77
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by cdnpilot77 »

CpnCrunch wrote:It might have been better if they hadn't got confused in their call to ATC and ended up with the approach lights off. They ended up at 300ft with no runway in sight but the ground visible, and at 200ft they finally saw it but were quite a ways off centreline. Would have been much simpler if they'd just asked for the approach lights on like they were intending to do :)

Also, it's pretty easy to do when there isn't any turbulence. Try it when your 172 is bouncing about like a wild stallion and the KAP140 can't even manage to do the approach, and I'll be a bit more impressed.
Also easy to be an armchair quarterback waiting to be impressed by a student pilot and cutting them down instead. :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
cdnpilot77
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by cdnpilot77 »

I was impressed by the instructors natural encouragement, coaching and congratulatory nature...he seemed a bit nervous but his overall demeanour obviously rubs off on this student. I didn't listen to all the dialogue afterwards, so maybe I missed something?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by cdnpilot77 on Sat May 02, 2015 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Shiny Side Up
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5335
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Group W bench

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Shiny Side Up »

I'm just uncertain whether Strega is being sarcastic or not.
---------- ADS -----------
 
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!
User avatar
cdnpilot77
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by cdnpilot77 »

Shiny Side Up wrote:I'm just uncertain whether Strega is being sarcastic or not.
I was wondering the same.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4137
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by CpnCrunch »

cdnpilot77 wrote:
CpnCrunch wrote:It might have been better if they hadn't got confused in their call to ATC and ended up with the approach lights off. They ended up at 300ft with no runway in sight but the ground visible, and at 200ft they finally saw it but were quite a ways off centreline. Would have been much simpler if they'd just asked for the approach lights on like they were intending to do :)

Also, it's pretty easy to do when there isn't any turbulence. Try it when your 172 is bouncing about like a wild stallion and the KAP140 can't even manage to do the approach, and I'll be a bit more impressed.
Also easy to be an armchair quarterback waiting to be impressed by a student pilot and cutting them down instead. :roll:
No, you missed my point (although perhaps I wasn't clear). I was just pointing out that flightchops isn't any worse than this guy. I don't really have anything against these videos, just playing devil's advocate because I don't really think it's fair to be constantly bashing flightchops.
---------- ADS -----------
 
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by iflyforpie »

Other than the facial hair and leaving zero margin for error, I don't see the difference either. :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
User avatar
Strega
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:44 am
Location: NWO

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Strega »

cdnpilot77 wrote:
Shiny Side Up wrote:I'm just uncertain whether Strega is being sarcastic or not.
I was wondering the same.

Me 3...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
User avatar
Rookie50
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1819
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:00 am
Location: Clear of the Active.

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Rookie50 »

"The real Deal"

Hmmmm. Maybe Some think 172's should routinely shoot approaches to minimums without approach lights instead of diverting to an alternate that was clearly open. Nahhh, do this instead and make a video.

Hey, just add night conditions and chance of icing, and they can be even cooler. That's whats its all about, right? Or.......
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Shiny Side Up
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5335
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Group W bench

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Shiny Side Up »

CpnCrunch wrote: I don't really have anything against these videos, just playing devil's advocate because I don't really think it's fair to be constantly bashing flightchops.
Indeed, that dead horse has been beaten enough. "Mr. Aviation's" videos aren't much different, and while I don't begrudge them, in quite a few that I viewed before Strega's recommendation, he makes a lots of unwise choices, one where he and some friends pick their way through some CBs comes to mind. But unless Strega is going to offer his own commentary about what he thinks is wrong about the video, repeatedly posting threads here what I'm assuming are in a disparaging manner, serves little point. Everyone already knows how the avcanada membership feel about them.
---------- ADS -----------
 
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!
User avatar
Strega
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:44 am
Location: NWO

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Strega »

Flight chops is a joke.... product of a typical "flight school" mentality...

Mr aviation actually does things,, including shooting an ils to minimums, and yes, hold your breath, dodge some cbs... Those that have not left the circuit in any capacity outside of their training will not understand this.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
User avatar
Rookie50
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1819
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:00 am
Location: Clear of the Active.

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Rookie50 »

Strega wrote:Flight chops is a joke.... product of a typical "flight school" mentality...

Mr aviation actually does things,, including shooting an ils to minimums, and yes, hold your breath, dodge some cbs... Those that have not left the circuit in any capacity outside of their training will not understand this.
I'm so impressed. Videos like this do a disservice to actual wise risk management. It isn't "cool" for a 172 to pick its way through CB's, either. Theres no place for this macho Top Gun crap in impressionable minds.

Edit --

That being said I looked but haven't seen the video, but "picking through CB's" -- I'm further assuming no WX radar -- doesn't sound like avoiding them by 25 miles, either. Pretty hard to pick through CB's that are embedded in IMC, too.

It's the mentality of making videos that lead to one doing cooler and cooler things, until one makes a big mistake, i don't support.

My $0.02.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Rookie50 on Sun May 03, 2015 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4137
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by CpnCrunch »

I didn't see the one with the CBs. Which one is it?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Strega
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:44 am
Location: NWO

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Strega »

It's the mentality of making videos that lead to one doing cooler and cooler things, until one makes a big mistake, i don't support.

So should we all just stay home then?

FYI the reason that stormscopes are installed in 172s or small cessnas it to aid in avoiding flying through a cell.. no?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
User avatar
Rookie50
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1819
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:00 am
Location: Clear of the Active.

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Rookie50 »

Strega wrote:
It's the mentality of making videos that lead to one doing cooler and cooler things, until one makes a big mistake, i don't support.

So should we all just stay home then?

FYI the reason that stormscopes are installed in 172s or small cessnas it to aid in avoiding flying through a cell.. no?
Did they have a stormscope? I have one, and it's certainly NOT sufficient. Lightning is not a prerequisite for cells that will rip one apart, throw one out of control, or at best, terrify you and your unlucky pax.

Yeah, this is real, good mentorship chatter for new pilots too. :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by photofly »

The pas devant les enfants theme is so dull, don't you think?
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
User avatar
Shiny Side Up
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5335
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Group W bench

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Shiny Side Up »

photofly wrote:The pas devant les enfants theme is so dull, don't you think?
Amen.
---------- ADS -----------
 
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!
Big Pistons Forever
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Big Pistons Forever »

photofly wrote:The pas devant les enfants theme is so dull, don't you think?
Better than a "pour encourager les autres" hubris........
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5666
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by altiplano »

Those guys got too much crap in there with them...

Cameras, tablets, efb...

Pretty boy posers.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by photofly »

Big Pistons Forever wrote: Better than a "pour encourager les autres" hubris........
I do not think that quote means what you think it means.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Lindsey
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 5:00 pm

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Lindsey »

Strega wrote:Flight chops is a joke.... product of a typical "flight school" mentality...
what's that supposed to mean?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Shiny Side Up
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5335
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Group W bench

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by Shiny Side Up »

Lindsey wrote:
Strega wrote:Flight chops is a joke.... product of a typical "flight school" mentality...
what's that supposed to mean?
It means that really, really awesome pilots like Strega didn't learn at a flight school or even with an instructor. As natural born pilots they were dropped out of the sky by Zeus, they learned to fly on the way down, and thus are a superior breed. Much like a North Korean dictator. They are completely self made, by a striking combination of innate iron will, genetic superiority and divine favour. They willed themselves to know how to fly in a process similar to Neo learning Kung-fu. Amazingly they also overcame any obstacles that flight schools, instructors and the regulator, all tools of some nameless old-one underdemon placed in their way.

If you were unfortunate enough to have learned to fly at a flight school it would be inconceivable for you to match their flying prowess.
---------- ADS -----------
 
We can't stop here! This is BAT country!
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Theres flight chops.. and then theres the real deal..

Post by photofly »

Shiny Side Up wrote:Amazingly they also overcame any obstacles that flight schools, instructors and the regulator, all tools of some nameless old-one underdemon placed in their way.
Cthulhu is working for Transport, now? :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Post Reply

Return to “Flight Training”