
http://www.flightsafetyaustralia.com/20 ... -the-prop/
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako
Common practice when operating off gravel, to check for prop damage.DonutHole wrote:Some accessories can be damaged if you counter-rotate the prop on some ac.
Why was he spinning the prop as part of his pre flight?
Eyes maybe?Redneck_pilot86 wrote:Common practice when operating off gravel, to check for prop damage.DonutHole wrote:Some accessories can be damaged if you counter-rotate the prop on some ac.
Why was he spinning the prop as part of his pre flight?
I don't get this fascination with touching things. It's not an annual inspection it's preflight. Use your eyes. What is a private pilot going to do if he feels a nick anyways? Hope he isn't going to pull out the file.shimmydampner wrote:Pretty common to run a hand along the leading edge to feel for nicks.
I can pick up a nick in the prop a lot easier by running my fingers across it than by eye. If it's bad enough I can walk over to my AME and see if it should be dressed or...DonutHole wrote:I don't get this fascination with touching things. It's not an annual inspection it's preflight. Use your eyes. What is a private pilot going to do if he feels a nick anyways? Hope he isn't going to pull out the file.shimmydampner wrote:Pretty common to run a hand along the leading edge to feel for nicks.
I don't get this fear of touching things. If you rely on your annual inspection to find problems with your aircraft, you shouldn't be flying. I know lots of private pilots who are quite capable of filing out a prop nick, and it if they aren't capable, they can do as others posted and contact an engineer to see if it needs to be addressed. Ignoring it is not a suitable option. I find 90% of the prop damage I discover by feel, every time I go near a prop I run a hand along it.DonutHole wrote:I don't get this fascination with touching things. It's not an annual inspection it's preflight. Use your eyes. What is a private pilot going to do if he feels a nick anyways? Hope he isn't going to pull out the file.shimmydampner wrote:Pretty common to run a hand along the leading edge to feel for nicks.
To check for hydraulic lock on radials you pull blades through with the starter and mags off.
Don't turn props backwards, the alternator/generator brushes wear in with the rotation of the prop, if you turn it backwards it will lead to chips in the leading edge of the brushes and accelerated wear and or failure. That goes for turbines as well with starter/generators.springlocked wrote:Inspecting prop - turn it backwards - it fired as soon as the impulse mag kicked in -- good procedure since you can never tell when you might have a live mag even if the switches are off. How do you treat a gun when you first pick it up??
Its actually a maintenance practice not to turn the prop backwards, Even a relatively new alternator brush will wear and develop an edge, and the armatures have grooves in them that catch the edge and most certainly do chip. If its your aircraft, do as you please, if its owned by someone else and you're hired to fly it, dont' take internet advice, ask your maintenance department what they want you to do and operate accordingly.5x5 wrote:I don't know why the old pilot's tale of accessory damage from hand turning a prop backwards persists.
I think it's partially due to an idea that seems to be common sense - they're made to spin one direction so if they turn in the other direction they can be damaged. But I challenge anyone to provide any reference from an actual part manufacturer that includes any such warning.
If you've ever taken an alternator apart, there certainly are "brushes" in them. Small carbon blocks that are pushed against a shaft by light springs. And they do wear in the direction of the rotation. However, they are not pushed hard against the shaft as the springs behind them are very small. And the shaft they are against is very smooth. Turning at extremely low speed in hand-powered movement there is no way that any edge will "catch" or chip.
I suppose that in a situation where the alternator was very high-time and the brushes were almost worn out and extremely thin there might be a very remote chance of damage of some sort but it would likely fail soon in use anyway at that point.
The other more commonly stated concern is that of damage to the vacuum pump. This seems a bit more likely from the "common sense" view as vac pumps work with relatively fine graphite vanes touching and rotating against a shaft. Closer tolerances and not pushed by springs so no forgiveness. Once again though, in the manufacturer published installation and maintenance guides you will find no warning against turning it backwards, at low speed by hand. Checking directly with the supplier tech support contact confirmed there is no risk of damage.
So if you are going to turn a prop by hand for purposes other than starting, please, please, please turn it backwards and avoid the risk of injury.
Who's practice and where is it written/published. I certainly can't find any such reference or recommendation using Google.tbaylx wrote:Its actually a maintenance practice not to turn the prop backwards
No counting blades... (5-7 blades) two blade or three bladed prop? That kind of shit gets confusing!DonutHole wrote:Most of the radial guys I know use the starter and count blades before flipping the mags