T-hangar vs Nested T-hangar

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
baileyrory
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:32 pm

T-hangar vs Nested T-hangar

Post by baileyrory »

I'm wondering if anyone has any practical experience with these two styles of hangar. I found some good graphics showing airplane hangars here. As far as I can tell, the T-Hangar and nested T-Hangar are identical as far as interior dimensions. I'm wondering if this is really the case.
---------- ADS -----------
 
baileyrory
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:32 pm

Re: T-hangar vs Nested T-hangar

Post by baileyrory »

After doing a bit more research, it looks like one of the biggest reasons to go with the nested T-hangar is the reduction of building materials and needed taxiway. I still haven't run across any interior dimensions to compare, though.
---------- ADS -----------
 
baileyrory
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:32 pm

Re: T-hangar vs Nested T-hangar

Post by baileyrory »

Probably the optimal hangar door design for me would be a bifold door. But there are others that I should look into. Side-by-side doors. Bottom rolling doors. Vertical lift.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
oldtimer
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: T-hangar vs Nested T-hangar

Post by oldtimer »

It has been my experience over the years that your neighbors are more important than the style of T hangar. I have seen hangars that were well built and safe and I have seen hangars that were a disaster. Factory built hangar doors are the best way to go. Many, many bifold doors that are "Home made" are of such poor design or build that I would not even walk under let alone park an airplane under. One design I worked with was a wide opening that used two manufacured aluminum overhead doors with center windows that used a heavy 8 inch square movable center post for the inside slider guides. To open the doors, one pulled each half of the doors up and overhead on the tracks, unlatched the center post and moved it to one side on barn door sliders. It was not a push button operation but was well designed, adjustable and durable.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The average pilot, despite the somewhat swaggering exterior, is very much capable of such feelings as love, affection, intimacy and caring.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
baileyrory
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:32 pm

Re: T-hangar vs Nested T-hangar

Post by baileyrory »

oldtimer wrote:It has been my experience over the years that your neighbors are more important than the style of T hangar. I have seen hangars that were well built and safe and I have seen hangars that were a disaster. Factory built hangar doors are the best way to go. Many, many bifold doors that are "Home made" are of such poor design or build that I would not even walk under let alone park an airplane under. One design I worked with was a wide opening that used two manufacured aluminum overhead doors with center windows that used a heavy 8 inch square movable center post for the inside slider guides. To open the doors, one pulled each half of the doors up and overhead on the tracks, unlatched the center post and moved it to one side on barn door sliders. It was not a push button operation but was well designed, adjustable and durable.
That's a very interesting design idea. Certainly not something I would have thought of myself. Thanks for sharing.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”