Fort McMurray mandatory evac
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
You can't build a preemptive fire break around every town and it wouldn't have slowed this fire down anyway. The fact environmentalists aren't fans of cutting down trees has nothing to do with it - neither are oil workers because everybody likes trees to look at especially on their own property.
You cut them down to make a fire break as necessary when there's a fire.
Ezra's full of s**t as usual.
You cut them down to make a fire break as necessary when there's a fire.
Ezra's full of s**t as usual.
- Shady McSly
- Rank 5
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 9:28 am
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
Rockie wrote:You cut them down to make a fire break as necessary when there's a fire.
Based on your vast fire suppression experience? Where did you work?
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
Considering the speed the fire moved at I don't think that's realistic.Rockie wrote:You can't build a preemptive fire break around every town and it wouldn't have slowed this fire down anyway. The fact environmentalists aren't fans of cutting down trees has nothing to do with it - neither are oil workers because everybody likes trees to look at especially on their own property.
You cut them down to make a fire break as necessary when there's a fire.
Ezra's full of s**t as usual.
The reason the oil sands operations themselves aren't too concerned about the fire is because they have a several hundred (thousand?) meter fire break already constructed. You can't wait until the fire starts then start chopping stuff down. It's either in place before hand or you choose not to do it for whatever reasons you may have.
Doesn't happen often where a fire does this much damage, but when it does it's devastating.
Ironically I've heard argue that the reason fires are getting larger and more difficult to deal with is because we're putting them out so effectively for the most part. No fires= no natural clearing of deadwood and renewal of old forests, so the stuff you have left is a tinderbox on a dry season like this.
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
You have no idea what my experience with this is or where I've worked. Besides that, do you think you need to be a fire suppression expert to know what a fire break is or that they're built in front of actual fires?Shady McSly wrote:Based on your vast fire suppression experience? Where did you work?
No it's not at all realistic where this fire is concerned as copious reports clearly indicate. This thing jumps over a kilometer at a time.tbaylx wrote:Considering the speed the fire moved at I don't think that's realistic.
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
I am wondering how a fire crosses a 1 km wide river. Does it heat up the air soo much that it ignites trees 1 km further away ? Is drift wood on fire crossing the river ? Something else ?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
Probably in a similar manner to how the Kelowna fires spread in 2003, flying embers and very high winds.digits_ wrote:I am wondering how a fire crosses a 1 km wide river. Does it heat up the air soo much that it ignites trees 1 km further away ? Is drift wood on fire crossing the river ? Something else ?
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
I imagine that once a fire reaches that level of intensity that the thermals are incredibly powerful and can carry significant bits of burning lumber not just ash high into the air and downwind.
Not sure what could be done, even metal roofs and stucco/brick etc. won't be enough. I guess you need to be extremely aggressive with catching fires very early, but then of course each year the fuel load accumulates.
Not sure what could be done, even metal roofs and stucco/brick etc. won't be enough. I guess you need to be extremely aggressive with catching fires very early, but then of course each year the fuel load accumulates.
-
- Rank Moderator
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
- Location: Straight outta Dundarave...
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
digits_ wrote:I am wondering how a fire crosses a 1 km wide river. Does it heat up the air soo much that it ignites trees 1 km further away ? Is drift wood on fire crossing the river ? Something else ?
A large fire can have 200 foot flames coming off the head, and has huge amounts of thermal energy being released. It will kick up small branches, pinecones, etc, and can carry them a long way downwind. All those embers have to do is land in a spot conducive to burning (dry grass, leaves, needles, etc..) with a strong wind blowing (as was the case in YMM), and it's off again..If you look at some of the 'Escape from McMurray' videos that are doing the rounds on YouFaceTwit, you can see that it is literally raining embers, as the people are driving along. Terrifying - how people managed to keep their cool while driving through that is amazing.
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:52 pm
- Location: Ontario
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
Ft, Mac could provide a perimeter of Select trees, thinned for a km with all ground, Call it a perimeter part), brush removed and grassed. beyond that another 1km perimeter of green fields,( call it grazing fields),,,,, A great make work project for inmates and welfare recipients !!! DREAM ON !!
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
Another thing that seems curious: why are there 4 waterbombers sitting in Gimli airport at this time ? Wouldn't it make sense to send them up there ?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
Does the city own the 2 km wide swath of land all around it to be able to make those changes? Does any city or town? How much will it cost for each community to do that? How effective will it be using this fire as a yard stick? Will people even support the change to the landscape, cost of the work and likely much higher cost of expropriating land to accomplish such a task?crazyaviator wrote:Ft, Mac could provide a perimeter of Select trees, thinned for a km with all ground, Call it a perimeter part), brush removed and grassed. beyond that another 1km perimeter of green fields,( call it grazing fields),,,,, A great make work project for inmates and welfare recipients !!! DREAM ON !!
I believe this kind of measure was recommended after Slave Lake, but at some point practical considerations to build huge pre-emptive fire breaks have to be weighed against existing fire detection and suppression capabilities, and a Ft. Mac type of event happening.
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
Manitoba is currently under a burn ban and has a couple significant fires burning right now, including evacuations of some communities. We have not had much precipitation to speak of and it wouldn't be prudent to send our quick response two provinces away, that's my guess.digits_ wrote:Another thing that seems curious: why are there 4 waterbombers sitting in Gimli airport at this time ? Wouldn't it make sense to send them up there ?
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 8132
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
No.. but the Province does since the lions's share of it is Crown Land, and since it is responsible for fire protection it should easily be able to allow the thinning of fuels around every interface in the province. The few private parcels shouldn't matter, because most likely they've already been cleared or at least high graded anyways.Rockie wrote:Does the city own the 2 km wide swath of land all around it to be able to make those changes? Does any city or town? How much will it cost for each community to do that? How effective will it be using this fire as a yard stick? Will people even support the change to the landscape, cost of the work and likely much higher cost of expropriating land to accomplish such a task?crazyaviator wrote:Ft, Mac could provide a perimeter of Select trees, thinned for a km with all ground, Call it a perimeter part), brush removed and grassed. beyond that another 1km perimeter of green fields,( call it grazing fields),,,,, A great make work project for inmates and welfare recipients !!! DREAM ON !!
I believe this kind of measure was recommended after Slave Lake, but at some point practical considerations to build huge pre-emptive fire breaks have to be weighed against existing fire detection and suppression capabilities, and a Ft. Mac type of event happening.
How much will it cost? Almost nothing. Put tenders out for the timber companies to do the work; they'll get the value in timber. Perhaps a bit of lost revenue in stumpage fees to encourage them to clear low grade wood... but a drop in the bucket compared to what even an average sized fire season costs--to say nothing about what has happened in Ft Mac.
This was one of the recommendations of the (largely ignored) Firestorm Report after 03 in the Okanagan.
Prevention is always better than suppression.
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1990
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
You can only fit so many airplanes in one chunk of airspace. Fires with active air suppression and co-current evacuation are very very busy.digits_ wrote:Another thing that seems curious: why are there 4 waterbombers sitting in Gimli airport at this time ? Wouldn't it make sense to send them up there ?
I wonder if this fire will lead to more prescribed burning in the future? Forest fires are natural and if done in a controlled manner, are perfectly safe.
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
I see, makes sense !mbav8r wrote:Manitoba is currently under a burn ban and has a couple significant fires burning right now, including evacuations of some communities. We have not had much precipitation to speak of and it wouldn't be prudent to send our quick response two provinces away, that's my guess.digits_ wrote:Another thing that seems curious: why are there 4 waterbombers sitting in Gimli airport at this time ? Wouldn't it make sense to send them up there ?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
To anyone who was pointing fingers about government incompetence allowing this fire to spread:
Looks like they did a good job considering how big the fire was: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/the ... e29930041/
Looks like they did a good job considering how big the fire was: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/the ... e29930041/
-
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
- Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
I'd still love to the the Ruskies show up. I'd bet they do things differently than we do and we might learn a thing or two. Language barrier would be a real issue in the airspace, but when help is offered and you say no thanks, the next time they might not offer.
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
I think the last thing congested firefighting airspace needs is a language barrier.co-joe wrote:I'd still love to the the Ruskies show up. I'd bet they do things differently than we do and we might learn a thing or two. Language barrier would be a real issue in the airspace, but when help is offered and you say no thanks, the next time they might not offer.
-
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4581
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
- Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
I don't know, didn't Quebec send CL-415's?
Re: Fort McMurray mandatory evac
I spilled my coffee.co-joe wrote:I don't know, didn't Quebec send CL-415's?