Westland Lysander Down

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

Post Reply
User avatar
JasonE
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 857
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 8:26 pm

Westland Lysander Down

Post by JasonE »

http://globalnews.ca/news/2771509/quick ... 29011430=1

C-GCWL I believe. Engine trouble, forced landing.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Carelessness and overconfidence are more dangerous than deliberately accepted risk." -Wilbur Wright
Broken Slinky
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:47 am

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by Broken Slinky »

Glad to hear no injuries. Hopefully they can rebuild it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
flysportstar
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 7:54 pm

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by flysportstar »

Glad everyone is OK.
Things could have been much worse! Thanks to the Ontario Government, all those useless wind turbines you see in the not too distant background would have certainly been a factor in the pilots decision of where to land, and what his approach path would have been.

There is currently a fight in Collingwood Ontario where they want to place 8, 500 foot tall wind turbines within a few miles of the Municipal airport. One or 2 of the turbines will actually be within the circuit.
Its only a matter of time before these waste of taxpayers money wind turbines wipe some airplane out of the sky in a situation like this.

Again....glad it turned out as well as it did.

Peter
---------- ADS -----------
 
PropToFeather
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 2:20 pm

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by PropToFeather »

flysportstar wrote:Things could have been much worse! Thanks to the Ontario Government, all those useless wind turbines you see in the not too distant background would have certainly been a factor in the pilots decision of where to land, and what his approach path would have been.

There is currently a fight in Collingwood Ontario where they want to place 8, 500 foot tall wind turbines within a few miles of the Municipal airport. One or 2 of the turbines will actually be within the circuit. Its only a matter of time before these waste of taxpayers money wind turbines wipe some airplane out of the sky in a situation like this.
There's 3 points here that are worth noting:

1) The sighting for the turbines in Ontario has been politically influenced, rather than driven by good expert analysis. That's stupid, and so is putting turbines in the circuit at an airport (or, really, within any distance that would endanger any current (or prospective) users of the airport). No question on that front.
2) Having flown a bit in that area, there are definitely hazards associated with turbines... but, it also is worth noting that all those turbines were (last I checked) clearly marked on both the VNC and the VTA for the area, and are placed far enough apart that they do not (at present) preclude field selection - the accident aircraft having been able to land in an area of 10+ mills (from what I remember of the area). Also, as a pilot, you have the final say of flying over turbines (potentially reducing your available landing sites - extremely so, if you choose to low level over a dense mill farm), or flying a marginally longer route over roads/open fields to increase your chances of a successful forced landing, should you need to do one.
3) Wastes of taxpayer money? "Useless"? Hardly. Now, did Ontario overpay for those turbines? Almost definitely. But, remember, those turbines are generating energy for the grid, meaning Ontario doesn't have to pay for as much imported hydro (Quebec and US), and is less reliant on non-renewables for generation. Both of those are economic (and, in the case of closing down the Nanticoke plant, health) benefits. Plus, maintenance work on said turbines is also a source of some jobs for the area where farming was previously one of the few ways to make a living.

Back on topic, Broken Slinky nailed it, a relatively good outcome, hopefully it can be fixed up and flying again, looks like it would be a sharp plane to see in the air.
---------- ADS -----------
 
If at first you don't succeed, maybe NDB approaches just aren't for you
anofly
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:46 am

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by anofly »

Sorry , but wind turbines are paid somewhere between twice and 3 times the price of other forms of electricity, and certainly more than we would pay for electricity from Quebec. The problem with Quebec as a source of electricity is 2fold, transmission lines and seasonal quantities. Wind is a very expensive type of non carbon emmitiing electricity generation, and it almost certainly needs expensive and polluting gas to back it up.
Your "global adjustment" portion of your bill is the "blending in " of renewables (wind solar) to conventional sources of generation like hydraulic and nuclear. Both of the last 2 are much cheaper than wind and solar.

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by photofly »

Lysander to wind turbines in just three posts... awesome.

If you're going to pick any vintage type to land in a field, the Lysander is a good choice. Shame about the damage.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
cgzro
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1735
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:45 am

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by cgzro »

Indeed, very glad nobody got hurt. Very true about the type. It was designed for landing in rough fields at night behind enemy lines, they are very tough birds and their stall speed with slats etc is about 60mph.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cgzro
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1735
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:45 am

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by cgzro »

[quote]generating energy for the grid, [/quote]

6% of the total.

And 100% backed up by something else.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
SheriffPatGarrett
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:11 pm

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by SheriffPatGarrett »

But windmills are the best finance source for the liberal party...used to be esquimo housing at half million each(costing $10,000)...Iceboxes for PET comfort!
---------- ADS -----------
 
fleet16b
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1196
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:49 am
Location: aerodrome of democracy

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by fleet16b »

PropToFeather wrote:[3) Wastes of taxpayer money? "Useless"? Hardly. Now, did Ontario overpay for those turbines? Almost definitely. But, remember, those turbines are generating energy for the grid, meaning Ontario doesn't have to pay for as much imported hydro (Quebec and US), and is less reliant on non-renewables for generation. Both of those are economic (and, in the case of closing down the Nanticoke plant, health) benefits. Plus, maintenance work on said turbines is also a source of some jobs for the area where farming was previously one of the few ways to make a living.
What fantasy world do you live in ?
---------- ADS -----------
 
...isn't he the best pilot you've ever seen?....Yeah he is ....except when I'm shaving.........
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3902
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Westland Lysander Down

Post by Inverted2 »

1). Glad to see the Lysander wasn't terribly damaged and there were no injuries.

2). If you are defending wind turbines you have been brainwashed or you are not very intelligent.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”