Misfueling close call
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako
-
Broken Slinky
- Rank 4

- Posts: 238
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:47 am
Re: Misfueling close call
A similar incident happened at Mt Tremblant airport a bunch of years ago with a Piper Mirage. Even with a nozzle that was too large for the fill hole it was topped up with Jet A. They ran the engine just figuring it was dirty plugs. Managed to right the engine off with that mistake.
Re: Misfueling close call
Murphy's Law always sides with the hidden flaw. Except in some cases, the flaw is not all that well hidden.
I wonder what is going to happen when we see more Cessna and Piper airplanes with diesel engines. Is there anything other than placards to prevent fueling those airplanes with 100LL Avgas instead of the required Jet A?
I do not think a diesel will run all that long at high power settings on a mixture of 100LL and Jet A.
I wonder what is going to happen when we see more Cessna and Piper airplanes with diesel engines. Is there anything other than placards to prevent fueling those airplanes with 100LL Avgas instead of the required Jet A?
I do not think a diesel will run all that long at high power settings on a mixture of 100LL and Jet A.
The average pilot, despite the somewhat swaggering exterior, is very much capable of such feelings as love, affection, intimacy and caring.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
Re: Misfueling close call
Nope, like I said I had to google it to see what the duckbill was all about. Single point I've seen before. I've been in the industry for about a decade now too.SuperchargedRS wrote:You've never seen a duckbill like this??
The only ones I've seen are ether the duckbills or single points like this
The duckbill is the most common jet fuel nozzle other there.
Re: Misfueling close call
Another misfueling that was caught. If the pilot is around, probably best to always ensure that the first thing that is done when the truck arrives is to check the fuel type written on the side of the truck, even before saying hello. To be honest, I didn't even check the pumps at a familiar flight school the other day when getting refueled, but as a policy, I think I will do it anyways, even when it is obvious that there could be no mistake. Then one has the automatic habit. And if you check every time, there should never be a misfueling.
Via Google Translate....
"C-FSUD, an Aero Commander 690B operated by MAG Aerospace Canada landed at the airport
of Maniwaki, QC (CYMW) for refueling. Once the aircraft is parked, the truck
refueling has approached. While the pilot finished filling out documents inside
from the aircraft, ground personnel began refueling. When the pilot left the aircraft, he
noticed the AVGAS lettering on the truck. He immediately asked to stop the refueling,
but 53 liters of fuel had already been poured. A letter has been sent to the company of
refueling to inform them of the differences between an AC690 (turbine engine) and an AC500
(piston engine), 2 models operated by MAG Aerospace Canada and request that the personnel
on the ground confirms with the pilot the type of fuel before starting to refuel. A reminder to
sent to company pilots reminding them that they must supervise refueling and
make sure the fuel type is correct."
Via Google Translate....
"C-FSUD, an Aero Commander 690B operated by MAG Aerospace Canada landed at the airport
of Maniwaki, QC (CYMW) for refueling. Once the aircraft is parked, the truck
refueling has approached. While the pilot finished filling out documents inside
from the aircraft, ground personnel began refueling. When the pilot left the aircraft, he
noticed the AVGAS lettering on the truck. He immediately asked to stop the refueling,
but 53 liters of fuel had already been poured. A letter has been sent to the company of
refueling to inform them of the differences between an AC690 (turbine engine) and an AC500
(piston engine), 2 models operated by MAG Aerospace Canada and request that the personnel
on the ground confirms with the pilot the type of fuel before starting to refuel. A reminder to
sent to company pilots reminding them that they must supervise refueling and
make sure the fuel type is correct."
Re: Misfueling close call
Not starting anything just giving examples.Heliian wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:56 amwhat kind of helicopter would that be? The majority won't take a flat nozzle.SuperchargedRS wrote:Perhaps that should be part of the conversions, being a pain in the arse for a few conversions is nothing compared to one misfuel, if I owned a FBO I would stick to standard nozzles.goingnowherefast wrote:Airports frequently visited by helicopters and aircraft with turbine conversions are danger spots. Turbo otters, beavers, etc. all have the standard avgas fuel openings, and don't fit the Jet A duck bill nozzles.
Our company has a ton of choppers, all use normal duck bills or single points.
Helicopters and conversions are at almost every airport on the planet. Get over it.
Bell 206 B, Bell 205, and Bell 412 I work on will all take the Duckbill no problem.
Re: Misfueling close call
Hi!Meecka wrote: ↑Mon Jul 20, 2020 9:35 amNot starting anything just giving examples.Heliian wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2016 4:56 amwhat kind of helicopter would that be? The majority won't take a flat nozzle.SuperchargedRS wrote:
Perhaps that should be part of the conversions, being a pain in the arse for a few conversions is nothing compared to one misfuel, if I owned a FBO I would stick to standard nozzles.
Our company has a ton of choppers, all use normal duck bills or single points.
Helicopters and conversions are at almost every airport on the planet. Get over it.
Bell 206 B, Bell 205, and Bell 412 I work on will all take the Duckbill no problem.
They don't work well with the range extenders in 206 series. It's been a while but I don't think they'll fit any older eurocopter products either. Enough that I've never seen one used by a helicopter company. The newer and bigger ones will have a big enough opening and even "single point" systems.
Our main bowser still has a round one and I can honestly say that I don't even look at the nozzle end on the truck, just look to make sure it's the right truck.
-
Big Pistons Forever
- Top Poster

- Posts: 5953
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
- Location: West Coast
Re: Misfueling close call
From NASA Technical paper 2203
It does not take much Jet A to really ruin your day.......Engine manufacturers generally
allow approximately 10 to 12
percent change in fuel/air ratio
as a detonation margin. If this
detonation margin is applied to
knock limited power curves it will
be found to equate to an octane
loss of 2 to 3 octane numbers.
That is, a loss of 2 to 3 octane
numbers will use up the design
safety margin and theoretically
subject the engine to possible
damage from detonation. Data from
Table #1 indicates that a loss of
2 octane numbers is reached
slightly beyond 2% contamination
of avgas by jet fuel
Re: Misfueling close call
Yes.I wonder what is going to happen when we see more Cessna and Piper airplanes with diesel engines. Is there anything other than placards to prevent fueling those airplanes with 100LL Avgas instead of the required Jet A?
1. Stay with the plane at refueling. Confirm the correct fuel Is going in the tanks.
Pay attention.
It is just that easy.
Accident speculation:
Those that post don’t know. Those that know don’t post
Those that post don’t know. Those that know don’t post
-
Stubby Phillips
- Rank 0

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 4:17 pm



