Jazz pilots contract?

Discuss topics relating to Jazz Aviation LP.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Redwine
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:20 pm
Location: FLINE@9

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Redwine »

unitholder wrote:Hi this is unitholder again.

To moreccplease - I agree you do need something, how it is paid may make all the difference read the following.

Just a question before I start in mattedfred's post what does SN? & MC? stand for being outside this industry I am unfamiliar
with the acronyms.

And to the mbav8r - to bad your handle didn't stand for master of business administration (mba) because you would be able to understand the following,
instead you will blindly walk to your union stewards ignorant tune.

To the paranoid union members I am not management, I am a private citizen who prior to you pilots voting for a strike mandate
was a unitholder in JAZ.UN period. My background is a private business owner in a low margin business similar to the airline industry.
Margins of 10 - 15% before indirect overhead costs. Where 80-90 hour weeks by the owners were not uncommon, but hard work and hope
have provided its rewards. I came to this forum to see the pilots perspective on their negoitiations and what they are asking for
for wage increases. If I gathered right from the posts and the "rumor mill" that the air mechanic must have heard it is a 5-5-5 over
three years. Which would have about an additional $ 17 MM impact on your bottom line for each year for a cummulative total of
$45MM after three years. The oil increase will probably have a $ 100 - 150 MM impact on your bottom line and so the question
remains can you pass all that increased costs to air canada and the customer or does the unit holders have to eat it. This pie
is very small.

Now back to your negotiations. I am just giving you a unitholders point of view. As we do not need to keep our money in JAZ.UN.
You are just one of a million places to park our cash. And we are not that rat you have on this post. (Speaking of subtle disregard)
Most of your unit holders are probably people like yourselves or the pension managers which are trying to maximize there return
to try and meet those crazy "defined benefit pension plan" expectations some short term thinking union contract negotiator
got for you pilots. If you think the unitholders are undeserving, then how is it in the same breathe you want to have a company
pay you good wages now, good benefits now, let you retire early and pay you for another 40 years till you die. There is not
a company or a government (speaking of Greece/Europe etc.) on this planet that can afford those costs. And a low margin competitive
industry like the airline industry hasn't done it and never will. You can write all the contracts you want if the economics aren't
their they just aren't their.

It is not about a wedge in your solidarity it is the cold hard economic facts, something I bet your shop steward doesn't even
understand. But just like the investors that fooled Bernad Madoff it will be the blind leading the blind and in the end those
poor saps which do not want to see the cold hard facts will say it is the gov't's fault. So they should subsidize this delusion.

As per JAZZ's finacial audits it started with a deem capital of $ 246 Million (MM) in 2005 it has earned up to Dec.31, 2009
$15MM ('06) + $14MM ('07) - ($10MM) ('08) + $93MM ('09). It has raised capital of 795MM ('07) and distributed $20MM('06) +
$ 107MM ('07) + $125MM ('08) + $103MM('09). So the current Equity in your company JAZZ is calculated as follows from 2005 to 2009.
Beg.RE + Capital Raised(C) +Income/-Loss(I/L) - Distributions(D) repeated by year:
$ 246 + 15(I)-20(D)+795(C)+14(I)-107(D)-10(L)+93(I)-103(D)+6(misc) => Ending Retained Earnings $ 804MM Dec 2009.
During that same time the stock of Jazz has gone from 8-10/unit down to 4.20 per unit - a drop in value of over 500MM where as
distribution where only $355MM. From an investment point of view the management and employees of Jazz have screwed the investors.

Also from an investor point of view this company started with $1 billion dollars and has earned $112MM over four years that is less
than 2.5% per year worse than a GIC over the same time frame. In addiion, that windfall gain in earnings for 2008 is not coming back.
Your company only made that because of the world financial crisis and the precipitous drop in the world oil price. Look at the income
statement yourself the only line item which changed was the fuel costs everything else for the most part stayed that same. Your union
piped pipers are going to complain that management paid off debt instead of giving it to the deserving pilots or invested in
another company down south. Your management probably did those things because debt is what kills a company when the economy goes south
- just ask the greek and spanish citizens. And they are probably investing south because your company just missed the angel of death
last year when air canada just about went bankrupt two times in a row. Those decision are long term decisions which hopefully will
save your long term careers. There is a reason accountants have a special note put in the financial statements when a company has
an economic dependence on one customer,because it goes against the tried and tested words of advice - DO NOT PUT YOUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET.

So your statements that the unitholders are sucking the cash out is just plain wrong. The next time you are sitting in those fancy
pilot chairs and making your bread and butter using that technological marvel they call autopilot. Remember it was not your money
which gave you that seat and your pay cheque it was those unit holders cash because you did not finance it yourself. They deserve a
better return than 2.5%.

And this gets to the whole point of I why I gave my two bits, it is because unions always want to blame someone. The management's bonus,
the unitholders distributions, the governments policies but never there short sight ignorant point of view. Your raise should be a
bonus based on profitability and nothing more.

It is a fact of this world that management get big bonuses. I don't like it as an investor either but I cannot change the this fact
of life and neither can you or your union. And if you look at your company's financial statments the management's bonus does not
affect the corpate success one way or another. If you want those bonuses then go and become management that door is open to anyone
which sets it as his goal and is able to succed to get it. You can blame management all you want but you are eating your own young.

For your industry it is airport fees, employee wages, airplanes and oil that are the major cost inputs. The only reason your company
made money in 2008 was because oil prices crashed every other expense is comparable. Your new CPA agreement with that pitiful
12.5% mark up, and the new price of oil in the $ 70 - 80 dollars is what is killing Jazz and your stupid union negotiators are leading
you down the garden path on this 60 cents distribution issue. Like I said I dropped all your stock in 5 minutes on the news that
you voted to strike, because when I see the renegotiated CPA, the cost of fuel, the high unemployment, the labour strife, etc your
industry is a risk nightmare from an investor point of view. So understand this the reason you paid that debt down early was because
oil went from 140/bb down to $ 40/bb and air Canada could not change the CPA fast enough to prevent IT from losing its a$$.
It wasn't management's good deeds or bad deeds it was strickly the world economy all of which has changed now and oil is 100% higher
than it was in 2008 and your CPA is 5% less and on top of it you want to add 15% over three years to the cost base - that will make
this company fly like a rock.

So put your union paranoia aside, and go and investigate the facts for yourself and remember your worst enemy is yourself.

Would you put money in Jazz right now with that new cost structure? And if you wouldn't then why would you put your life and
career in it? It is the same thing.

And if you would put your money into Jazz then negotiate a contact where you maintain a high profitability because that is the only
guarantee you have if you are going to stay in the airline industry. And if you don't then be the big responsible pilots you say
you are and when your stock price has dropped to nothing and you need to raise money for those new planes then get your union
to cough up its own cash and you also dig into your life savings like the rest of us have to do. But then that would
require you to believe in yourself and in your company and then you would see success is not achieve by a union contract.


PS. to 4Stroke this is not a laughing matter this is your life I am just an observer. I have removed my skin in the game when
I sold my stock. I look at this as an outside obsever and someone who ran a business in a low margin industry like the airline
industry - so laugh all you want it doesn't affect me one way or another I will not be on that picket line getting handouts as
I rub my hands over the oil drum and eat food bank meals. This is your life enjoy it and make sure you rub shoulder with the
brotherhood because that is all the 90% plus vote is going to get you in that low margin airline industry. PS it is not your fault
some industries are just mature low margin industries.

Good Lord man...Go see a psychologist or get laid or something.
---------- ADS -----------
 
...Seems they are going to remove the axe and the control column from the cockpits for security reasons.
dream_big
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:04 pm

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by dream_big »

All I get from that long arse post is, I was a greedy investor and if jazz pilots get more of what they deserve the investors will get less of what they deserve!

Just because you claim the overall return is poor, meaning the unit holders deserve what they are getting if not more. well here is an idea, if so lousy take your investment to a GIC if it's better! If you want to make 1 million dollars in this industry make sure you start with 2!!! (or just get a management job)

and p.s. your ABSOLUTELY right that everywhere in the entire world management usually gets a nice handsome bonus! However, NOWHERE in the entire world (specially aviation to the regional level), are they rewarded anywhere close to this!
---------- ADS -----------
 
prop2jet
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 590
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:50 am

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by prop2jet »

The next time you are sitting in those fancy
pilot chairs and making your bread and butter using that technological marvel they call autopilot. Remember it was not your money
which gave you that seat and your pay cheque it was those unit holders cash because you did not finance it yourself.
Unitholder: Were you in on the ground floor when Jazz launched it IPO? Did you purchase any new issue units? I doubt it... you bought them on the market, therefore you did not inject any new money into the business. Argue whatever you want the fact is, at least from what I can retain from your diatribe was that you bought in, cashed out and collected some cash along the way. You contributed absolutely nothing to Jazz.

That you mock our profession by stating that we do nothing but sit in the chair and let the autopilot do all the work merely demonstrates your short sightedness, lack of respect and understanding for our profession.
---------- ADS -----------
 
countryhick
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:12 am
Location: Down in Butlertown

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by countryhick »

The next time you are sitting in those fancy
pilot chairs and making your bread and butter using that technological marvel they call autopilot. Remember it was not your money


Tell you what Skippy, we'll give Joe a call, set up an "investor relations" fam flight, I'll take you up to 390 in the big fancy airplane with the fancy pilot chairs and then I'll turn off the technological marvel and we'll see how you do.
---------- ADS -----------
 
unitholder
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 7:20 pm

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by unitholder »

prop2jet : You are right I bought in the market, in fact in the financial crisis at the very low and jaz has done good for me.
In fact I find Jazz to be a very well run company and when I have flown it I have never had a problem.

But just because I bought in the market does not nullify one thing I said about the return on capital, it just means that some other investor took a write down which
really was my point.

But that is not my point here it is not about my return, it is about adding to your knowledge all sides of the story as the truth rests in the middle somewhere.

In all the posts prior to my first post there was not mention of the unitholder's position and both management & employees have a tendency to minimize
the capital involved to finance corporations. That was my only goal. The comment on the pilot's chair is not a disrespect of the profession it is an acknowledgement
of the capital invested in the company which is often ignored as it does not have a voice at the table.

In regards to the comment that pilots have short attention spans I doubt that, I think you have read the point and the perspective and it is hard to walk away from
that knowledge.

I do not envy your company's task ahead (all parties management, staff & investors) you have quite a circle to square in your negotiations.

And getting away from the back biting, you are one of the few airlines which are successful in a very difficult time in your industry and for that you are all to be commended and
rewarded. It just has to be done without killing the golden goose.

And yes I am off to my next investment - find a good company (eg. JAZZ) in a bad circumstance (eg.the financial crisis) and buy the stock at a significant discount. Maybe BP?????
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2792
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by yycflyguy »

Maybe BP?????
Hold off on that gem until the clean up liability has been sorted out.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
moreccsplease
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by moreccsplease »

countryhick wrote:Tell you what Skippy, we'll give Joe a call, set up an "investor relations" fam flight, I'll take you up to 390 in the big fancy airplane with the fancy pilot chairs and then I'll turn off the technological marvel and we'll see how you do.
Nominated for Quote of Year!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Iris
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:31 am

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Iris »

The next time you are sitting in those fancy
pilot chairs and making your bread and butter using that technological marvel they call autopilot. Remember it was not your money
which gave you that seat
$50,000+ for education plus 8-9 years of sweat equity say different.

Balance Sheet Q1/F10
Cash + ST Investments 250,103
Current Assets 377,124
PP&E 200,017
Total Assets 1,297,351
Current Liabilities 214,279
LT Debt 92,520
Total Liabilities 372,791
Shareholders' Equity 924,559
Also from an investor point of view this company started with $1 billion dollars and has earned $112MM over four years that is less
than 2.5% per year worse than a GIC over the same time frame. In addiion, that windfall gain in earnings for 2008 is not coming back.
Jazz traded at $2.50 the last day of trading May 2009. It closed at $4.21 May 31, 2010. Include the $0.67 dividend, and that makes a one year total return of 95.2%.
As an investor, I think you should know, that is slightly better than GICs, and you should be happy with that.

If anyone cares to check the REAL numbers, everything is public on www.sedar.com.

Iris
---------- ADS -----------
 
Koizie1
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:21 am
Location: uh, dunno

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Koizie1 »

Unitholders email sums the situation up pretty well. Remember, personal feelings aside pilots are a business expense. Nothing more. His point seems to me to be that, if Jazz is not attractive to investors then Jazz is up the creek without a paddle, any company keeps its investors happy first, customers second, and staff third. 1500 pilots agreeing to strike will undoubtedly scare off investors, if I had any money to invest it'd scare me off.

Lets say every pilot got a pay increase of ten grand. With 1500 pilots, thats an inrease in costs of 15 million. Every year. Wiith flight attendants to follow, and probably every other employee group at Jazz.

I hope I'm wrong, but I think this deal might take a bit longer and cause a lot of heartache to employees expecting the 'good times'.

Good luck.
---------- ADS -----------
 
dream_big
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:04 pm

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by dream_big »

His point seems to me to be that, if Jazz is not attractive to investors then Jazz is up the creek without a paddle, any company keeps its investors happy first, customers second, and staff third.
NO! That's exactly what jazz has wrong! Go watch some new reports that the CEO gives about his airline!
Infact his idea of this situation is completely opposite. Shareholders are 3rd and somehow he has one of the most successfully run airlines in the world!

Unitholders first!! Give me a break. Only reason their first is because their bonuses come from that!
---------- ADS -----------
 
dream_big
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:04 pm

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by dream_big »

Sorry. I didn't add in there. CEO of Southwest.
---------- ADS -----------
 
habs
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 7:57 pm

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by habs »

Correct about Southwest CEO. He says employees first, passengers second, shareholders third. If the first 2 are happy, the 3rd will be happy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Mclovin
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:49 pm
Location: Limbo

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Mclovin »

habs wrote:Correct about Southwest CEO. He says employees first, passengers second, shareholders third. If the first 2 are happy, the 3rd will be happy.
Wow what a bizarre concept :rolleyes:
---------- ADS -----------
 
following our will and wind we may just go where no one's been.
Martin Tamme
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:58 pm

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Martin Tamme »

habs wrote:Correct about Southwest CEO. He says employees first, passengers second, shareholders third. If the first 2 are happy, the 3rd will be happy.

Are you sure it was the CEO of Southwest who made that statement? I recall it being J.W. Marriott JR, owner of the Marriott Hotels chain, who wrote about it in his book titled: "The Spirit to Serve - Marriott's Way" and published in 1997. Mind you he did say guests as opposed to passengers.


The statement is in Chapter 3: "Give to your employees and they will give back to you"

http://www.amazon.com/Spirit-Serve-Marr ... 0066621143



HOSPITALITY TIPS

THE SPIRIT TO SERVE
Marriott's Way
By J.W. Marriott Jr. and Kathi Ann Brown
HarperBusiness 216pp $25

Any company that began as a root-beer stand in 1927 with $6,000 in seed money and now pulls in $12 billion as a global hotelier with 1,500 properties must have done something right. In The Spirit to Serve, J.W. Marriott Jr., chairman of Marriott International Inc., and co-author Kathi Ann Brown deliver folksy lessons about the enduring values underlying the successful company founded as Hot Shoppes in downtown Washington. A quick read, the slim volume provides inspiration for execs who want to connect with the basics.

Filled with business-world homilies, such as the need to ''maintain order AND embrace change simultaneously,'' the book can seem corny and old-fashioned. But like Ronald Reagan's speeches, it's also somehow appealing, especially in its use of self-deprecating anecdotes.

Marriott and Brown offer one easy-to-remember concept in each chapter--such as the benefits of hands-on management, consistent quality, and
respect for employees. We learn that Marriott's parents stayed up half the night hanging pictures before the 1957 opening of their first hotel, the Twin Bridges in Arlington, Va. J.W. Jr. handled room service at their second hotel, and today, he travels 150,000 miles a year, inspecting various Marriott sites. The company has a manual detailing 66 steps to clean a room, a procedure to ensure that every Marriott upholds its standards. And Marriott prides itself on taking care of its workers--offering help with everything from immigration to child-care woes--so that employees, in turn, will go the extra mile to take care of guests.

With such hallmarks of Marriott operational prowess, the company enjoyed 20% growth with a 20% return on equity every year from 1979 until 1990. But the authors willingly point out its stumbles as well. The most serious: a 1980s foray into real estate dealmaking. That nearly plunged the company into disaster when the real estate crash hit in 1990. Chief Financial Officer Steve Bollenbach pulled it back from the brink by splitting the company in two: Host Marriott Corp., to hold the unsold properties, and Marriott International, a pure hotel-management company. The ploy saved the company, but it invited a spate of bondholder lawsuits.

That experience persuaded Marriott to return to founding principles. During the 1980s, the authors conclude, company execs fell prey to arrogance born of success--thinking Marriott invulnerable to downturns. Only through a deeply ingrained sense of teamwork did it recover. Top managers accepted a one-year salary freeze, and few jumped ship.

In the end, Marriott and Brown exhort companies to ''preserve order amid change'' and to ''preserve change amid order''--that is, to stay grounded in one's corporate culture while adapting to a changing market. By extolling the fundamental values of the company--humility, hard work, and respect for others--they succeed in imparting simple corporate folk wisdom, not rocket science. Plenty of execs could benefit from the reminder.
---------- ADS -----------
 
mbav8r
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Manitoba

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by mbav8r »

http://www.strategy-business.com/media/ ... _04212.pdf
S+B: Let’s start with some words
from your award. You made an
“audacious commitment” to putting
employees first, customers second,
and shareholders third. How did you
get away with that for 20 years?
KELLEHER: When I started out,
business school professors liked to
pose a conundrum: Which do you
put first, your employees, your customers,
or your shareholders? As if
that were an unanswerable question.
My answer was very easy: You put
your employees first. If you truly
treat your employees that way, they
will treat your customers well, your
customers will come back, and that’s
what makes your shareholders
happy. So there is no constituency at
war with any other constituency.
Ultimately, it’s shareholder value
that you’re producing.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Stand-by, I'm inverted"
User avatar
Flying Low
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 928
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:22 pm
Location: Northern Ontario...why change now?

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Flying Low »

I'm sure that a few CEO's actually get it but they are few and far between nowadays. Probably because very few of them are in it for the long term. It's easy to sell off assets and strip money away from your workers for short term gain. It just doesn't work very well for the long term.

The quote is from the CEO of Southwest. Southwest had a very large number of consecutive profitable quarters which he attributed to putting his employees first, customer second and shareholders third. By placing his employees first the rest took care of itself.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"The ability to ditch an airplane in the Hudson does not qualify a pilot for a pay raise. The ability to get the pilots, with this ability, to work for 30% or 40% pay cuts qualifies those in management for millions in bonuses."
Iris
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:31 am

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Iris »

Lets say every pilot got a pay increase of ten grand. With 1500 pilots, thats an inrease in costs of 15 million. Every year. Wiith flight attendants to follow, and probably every other employee group at Jazz.
The Thomas Cook deal is expected to bring in $100 million per year.
---------- ADS -----------
 
prop2jet
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 590
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:50 am

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by prop2jet »

15 million is peanuts considering the company extracted close to 64 million a year through CCAA. The executive management of Jazz have failed to diversify the Company's interests over the last five years, instead waiting until we are in the midst of Contract negotiations to say "Hey we have new business and need to have low costs so that we can continue to hand over generous distributions/dividends to our valuable unitholders".

While everyone has had to take a hit over the last five plus years... JR makes off with an 88% pay increase not counting what he has taken by way of bonuses and other compensation. And WTF does he do? Up until the latest business transactions (and then it is debatable) a CHIMP could have been CEO (and would have cost a hell of a lot less)!
---------- ADS -----------
 
tink
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 12:19 pm
Location: Whereever they send me

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by tink »

Yawn. Same old same old.
---------- ADS -----------
 
mattedfred
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1502
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by mattedfred »

---------- ADS -----------
 
mbav8r
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Manitoba

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by mbav8r »

Very well written, I think I like Lee-Ann, she told our story quite well. Hope Joe's reading it, not likely he'll care though.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Stand-by, I'm inverted"
Old fella
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2497
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:04 am
Location: I'm retired. I don't want to'I don't have to and you can't make me.

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Old fella »

countryhick wrote:The next time you are sitting in those fancy
pilot chairs and making your bread and butter using that technological marvel they call autopilot. Remember it was not your money


Tell you what Skippy, we'll give Joe a call, set up an "investor relations" fam flight, I'll take you up to 390 in the big fancy airplane with the fancy pilot chairs and then I'll turn off the technological marvel and we'll see how you do.


Gotta head over to NL next month so hopefully this "investor relations" fam flight is not disguised as a sked flight cause if it is, I am getting off right now. I am not really interested in being part of a "bean counter MBA" introduction to all things FL390............

:shock: :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mône
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: PQ

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Mône »

Koizie1 wrote:Remember, personal feelings aside pilots are a business expense. Nothing more.
Ok that statement is wrong at so many levels. If I understand you correctly, it means a Doctor is JUST ANOTHER EXPENSE for the health system. We don't care about the fact he needs to keep his knowledge current (like pilots), that he went through extensive training and gathered experience on which he can rely to save lives. He's just an expense.
Tell you what. Take a bunch of high school drop outs, give them a nice fancy hat and uniform, give them a 500$ cheque every week and have them fly those planes if an airline pilot licence, years of experience and thousands of flight hours are only good for creating glorified bus drivers.

This is EXACTLY the attitude we want to get rid of in this industry. Pilots are NOT just another expense. We are a group of professionals, that put their licence on the line every year with strict evaluation, that use the best of their knowledge and experience to carry millions of passengers every year SAFELY and take RESPONSIBILTY for those people on their aircraft.
You think that's not worth recognition? That it's JUST ANOTHER EXPENSE?
I wouldn't want my wife or kids to be on a plane where a pilot thinks of himself as an expense, and that safety and professionalism doesn't matter. Would you?

Career contract, we are NOT asking.
---------- ADS -----------
 
one8tee
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 8:05 pm

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by one8tee »

Umm unitholder..are you joking? For the record:

I am a jazz pilot, and a unitholder. Have bought and sold several times over the last 2 years with an average ROI of 93%. This is not including dividends.. they provided an average of an additional 23%. So please show me:

a) Another airline returning a div yield of greater than 23%
b) Another profitable airline over 08/09

Pilots aren't in this business to make you money.. we're here to make money for ourselves but we are smart enough to do our jobs professionally enough to make the company lots of money. and therefore you lots of money... A little selfish to come on here and tell us all we don't deserve to get paid industry standard wages because you would like a 116% ROI isn't it? Even if the price didn't go up, a 15% div yield is more than enough reason to invest in this company.

Take care of us and we'll take care of you. Otherwise see how much this company makes without pilots.

Also unitholder.. as a businessman would you care to share with us how many years of experience you have doing what you do, what you take home every month, and how much the guy in command of a pressurized tube flying 6 miles above the ground at 700mph should make? Keep in mind your family probably flies on airplanes once in a while..

180
---------- ADS -----------
 
Odysseus
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:47 am
Location: CYYZ

Re: Jazz pilots contract?

Post by Odysseus »

Unitholder:
Just a couple things I thought you would know, having previously bought Jazz shares...
Jazz is not a typical airline, we do not sell tickets, we do not buy our own fuel. Air Canada pays the gas and puts the passengers in the seats. Jazz gets paid (and turns a profit!) whether the planes are full or empty. Jazz makes a profit whether oil is 60$, or 150$ a barrel. Jazz has being paying out the highest dividend of any airline BAR NONE! I do not think that what the pilots are asking for will necessitate revising that dividend but if it did, I would not lose sleep over it.

Jazz gets paid to fly an airplane from point A to B safely and on schedule, and we have some of the best on time performance stats in the industry. Who makes that happen? Pilots. Flight attendants. Dispatchers. AME's and ground crews. In short: the EMPLOYEES. Not management, not the executives or the board of directors, not shareholders. For an airline to succeed it needs to listen to its employees first, its customers second, and its investors third. I didn't just make that up, that's part of South West's business model.

We will not bankrupt this airline, in fact we have been keeping it afloat though some of the roughest waters this industry has faced. It is always easy to blame the employees when an airline goes under, but rarely do the employees get their fair share when an airline succeeds, such as this one has. The employees, especialy the pilots, have the most at stake in this airline, but it would not be hard for most of us FO's who get paid 36K a year to go out and find other (better paying!) work.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Jazz Aviation LP - Air Canada Express”