Since when did flying across the . require "balls"?Colonel Sanders wrote:TPC: I can't let this slide by. PF is in the processstop preaching from your couch ... without a shred of experience
of flying the North Atlantic, via Greenland and
Iceland, in a small piston single with stock fuel
tanks - and an engine past TBO!!
That takes balls, TPC. Great big ones. And he's
even a flight instructor, so he's probably not much
of a pilot in your opinion.
Maybe you've done 3 moon landings in the last
week, so you can laugh at PF's journey, which
is "preaching from the couch" compared to your
vast experience. But I highly doubt it.
Sorry to spill the beans, PF, but this thread turned
ludicrous.
I will opine that it requires planning, and decision making... Wait a minute... Doesn't every flight require that kind of due diligence?
Piston engine past TBO? That's simply a red herring Colonel...
As for the rest of your comments....
I have never berated nor insulted either of the two posters I had quoted. If either of them took my comment at anything other than face value... Sorry, that certainly wasn't my intent.
Furthermore I have NEVER insinuated anything that would explain or justify your comment about one of them also being an instructor.
I find it tiresome however to read so called "experts" comments when it comes to topics they are not well versed in. (re:egress from a submerged aircraft)
Perhaps you can relate whenever you read a comment from some know it all when it comes to discussing the finer points of aerobatics?
All the best,
TPC
PS: We've met before in Bobby's hangar and you already know that I don't wear epaulettes at work!