With you. All good.Aviatard wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 4:32 pmFair point. I apologize. Now I’ll watch the Leafs first second round game in 19 years.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 4:12 pmIf not “fully tested” what is it? Experimental. That is what phase 1 trials are.
There’s then therefore absolutely no point in saying “tested” at all.
And first one with the personal insults — loses the argument.
Is JerryRig Right?
- rookiepilot
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Is JerryRig Right?
Re: Is JerryRig Right?
Most of those aren't evidence. And the ones that could be considered evidence are spotty at best.dontcallmeshirley wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 12:17 pmYou have made a claim without any sources or evidence.JerryRig wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 11:42 am Your quote is correct. But the c19 mRNA is not that. If you searched how mRNA works you will discover this. It’s never been used on humans before and it failed the animal tests. It is neither safe nor effective. In addition to that, many may have been administered saline placebo as this is a human trial phase.
I counter your argument with the following quotes and links to reputable sources.
World Health OrganizationThe vaccine is safe and effective for all individuals aged 6 months and above.
New England Journal of MedicineThe mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified.
National Library of MedicineA two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines.
Health CanadaClinical trials showed that beginning 2 weeks after the second dose, the Moderna Spikevax® COVID vaccine was:
- 94.1% effective in protecting trial participants aged 18 and above against COVID-19
- 100% effective in trial participants 12 to 17 years old
- as effective in trial participants 6 to 11 years old as in young adults (18 to 25 years old)
Johns Hopkins MedicineYes. The two mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna, authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), are very safe and very good at preventing serious or fatal cases of COVID-19. The risk of serious side effects associated with these vaccines is very small.
Health canada and WHO telling people to get vaccinated and that they are effective is part of the problem.
Anything claiming the vaccines were 100% effective should have been written off as a garbage study right away.
The way you classify Jerry's claims as not having evidence certainly applies to some of the above quotes. WHO "the vaccines are safe and effective". That carries no weight on its face. Just cause the WHO said it doesnt make it true and doesn't make it evidence.
-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2023 9:02 pm
Re: Is JerryRig Right?
I quoted authorities on the matter and provided links to the source. Just because you don't like the source does not automatically mean that their argument is incorrect.khedrei wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 9:02 pm Most of those aren't evidence. And the ones that could be considered evidence are spotty at best.
Health canada and WHO telling people to get vaccinated and that they are effective is part of the problem.
Anything claiming the vaccines were 100% effective should have been written off as a garbage study right away.
The way you classify Jerry's claims as not having evidence certainly applies to some of the above quotes. WHO "the vaccines are safe and effective". That carries no weight on its face. Just cause the WHO said it doesnt make it true and doesn't make it evidence.
A wise woman once told me, "Stupidity is like death; it only affects those around you."
Re: Is JerryRig Right?
I suggest everybody get up to date on the testimony of credible witnesses under oath and hear for yourselves.
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/nci-live/
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/nci-live/
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:46 pm
Re: Is JerryRig Right?
I'm sure TG and the likes will say those credible witnesses are not credible!JerryRig wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 10:14 pm I suggest everybody get up to date on the testimony of credible witnesses under oath and hear for yourselves.
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/nci-live/
The problem is not that we don't have access to the truth. It's that most people don't want to hear it.
-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2023 9:02 pm
Re: Is JerryRig Right?
An accountant and a politician, neither of which have any formal education in medicine, virology, or any science.JerryRig wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 10:14 pm I suggest everybody get up to date on the testimony of credible witnesses under oath and hear for yourselves.
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/nci-live/
Tell me how your one source is more reputable than the five sources of medical professionals I quoted?
Re: Is JerryRig Right?
You are correct. Cognitive Dissonance is a bitch.CortoMaltese wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:00 amI'm sure TG and the likes will say those credible witnesses are not credible!JerryRig wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 10:14 pm I suggest everybody get up to date on the testimony of credible witnesses under oath and hear for yourselves.
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/nci-live/
The problem is not that we don't have access to the truth. It's that most people don't want to hear it.
Re: Is JerryRig Right?
These are real people giving real first hand testimony…an affidavit if you will, of the affects or of contradictions to the validation of the mandates and lockdowns, highlighting the harms and treaspass and evidence of treason. The point is what happened was wrong on so many levels but a cloud of blindness has descended on much of the worlds population.dontcallmeshirley wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:08 amAn accountant and a politician, neither of which have any formal education in medicine, virology, or any science.JerryRig wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 10:14 pm I suggest everybody get up to date on the testimony of credible witnesses under oath and hear for yourselves.
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/nci-live/
Tell me how your one source is more reputable than the five sources of medical professionals I quoted?
-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2023 9:02 pm
Re: Is JerryRig Right?
What this thread comes down to is "if you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole."JerryRig wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 11:14 am These are real people giving real first hand testimony…an affidavit if you will, of the affects or of contradictions to the validation of the mandates and lockdowns, highlighting the harms and treaspass and evidence of treason. The point is what happened was wrong on so many levels but a cloud of blindness has descended on much of the worlds population.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LG4hOjJ9tEs