United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in YOW

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

GyvAir
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1817
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in YOW 2

Post by GyvAir »

---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Brantford Beech Boy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 668
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:34 am
Location: Brantford? Not so much...

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by Brantford Beech Boy »

Huh,
unstabilized approach and non-adherrance to SOPs....

Where have I heard that recently?

BBB
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Almost anywhere, almost anytime...worldwide(ish)"
Liquid Charlie
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:40 am
Location: YXL
Contact:

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by Liquid Charlie »

Nations capital and not even a cat2 runway -only in Canader you say-pity
---------- ADS -----------
 
Black Air has no Lift - Extra Fuel has no Weight

ACTPA :kriz:
KK7
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 855
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:41 am

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by KK7 »

Liquid Charlie wrote:Nations capital and not even a cat2 runway -only in Canader you say-pity
Ottawa is not busy enough nor is the weather often poor enough to require a CAT II.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Liquid Charlie
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:40 am
Location: YXL
Contact:

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by Liquid Charlie »

Ottawa is not busy enough nor is the weather often poor enough to require a CAT II.
that has to be one of the silliest replies i have ever read and I must say typical canadian aviation thinking -- spend millions on putting shops and bars into an airport terminal and not spend a cent on improving operational facilities -- like a grooved runway and a cat 2 landing -- seems that places like Europe figure it's good policy and airports far less busy that Ottawa have it -- I'm sure wpg has no more "bad"wx than ottawa -- go figure -- only in canader -- silly
---------- ADS -----------
 
Black Air has no Lift - Extra Fuel has no Weight

ACTPA :kriz:
Go Guns
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 967
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:22 pm
Location: on my way

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by Go Guns »

spend millions on putting shops and bars into an airport terminal and not spend a cent on improving operational facilities
While I agree to your line of thought, it's not relevant to this incident.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Liquid Charlie
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:40 am
Location: YXL
Contact:

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by Liquid Charlie »

While I agree to your line of thought, it's not relevant to this incident.
-- I did mention grooved runway :smt040
---------- ADS -----------
 
Black Air has no Lift - Extra Fuel has no Weight

ACTPA :kriz:
swordfish
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 745
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 12:18 am
Location: CYZF

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by swordfish »

Liquid Charlie wrote:
Ottawa is not busy enough nor is the weather often poor enough to require a CAT II.
that has to be one of the silliest replies i have ever read and I must say typical canadian aviation thinking -- spend millions on putting shops and bars into an airport terminal and not spend a cent on improving operational facilities -- like a grooved runway and a cat 2 landing -- seems that places like Europe figure it's good policy and airports far less busy that Ottawa have it -- I'm sure wpg has no more "bad"wx than ottawa -- go figure -- only in canader -- silly
+1
In Europe almost every village, town, and city has an ILS and most of the larger cities are set up with Cat IIIb facilities. After the ILS is installed, the associated ground infrastructure is the least expensive part of it. Tho it will take NavCanada 2 years to publish the plate...
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by linecrew »

Liquid Charlie wrote:
While I agree to your line of thought, it's not relevant to this incident.
-- I did mention grooved runway :smt040
The airport has never had grooved runways since they were built back in the 50's and you'd be hard pressed to find incidents of aircraft sliding off (outside of winter ops) except in the last handful of years.

Are some modern aircraft like the early model ERJs not able to handle this type of runway surface? Is it the calibre of crews flying in there? I just don't get how this has 'suddenly' become a problem.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4195
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by CpnCrunch »

It seems odd to select maximum thrust for 7 seconds at 5 feet AGL. Shouldn't they have either just let the aircraft settle onto the runway, or else fully committed to a go-around?
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyinhigh
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3133
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: my couch

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by flyinhigh »

Lack of experience is the reason here. 2 reasons that stand out are;

1. In a storm with high winds they selected full flap coming through 1000'. Now your changing configuration in deteriorating weather conditions. Can anyone say unstable approach already.

2. Max reverse selected while aircraft is in the air. (Selected max reverse at 5' agl for 7 seconds), sry you hit reverse while in the air....If you wanna do this do a go around, obviously your already worried.
---------- ADS -----------
 
av8ts
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:31 am

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by av8ts »

flyinhigh wrote:Lack of experience is the reason here. 2 reasons that stand out are;

1. In a storm with high winds they selected full flap coming through 1000'. Now your changing configuration in deteriorating weather conditions. Can anyone say unstable approach already.

2. Max reverse selected while aircraft is in the air. (Selected max reverse at 5' agl for 7 seconds), sry you hit reverse while in the air....If you wanna do this do a go around, obviously your already worried.
I think that was max thrust not max reverse thrust
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4195
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by CpnCrunch »

av8ts wrote:
flyinhigh wrote:Lack of experience is the reason here. 2 reasons that stand out are;

1. In a storm with high winds they selected full flap coming through 1000'. Now your changing configuration in deteriorating weather conditions. Can anyone say unstable approach already.

2. Max reverse selected while aircraft is in the air. (Selected max reverse at 5' agl for 7 seconds), sry you hit reverse while in the air....If you wanna do this do a go around, obviously your already worried.
I think that was max thrust not max reverse thrust
Yes, and the report says the aircraft wasn't equipped with reverse thrust (and that was a factor in the overrun).
---------- ADS -----------
 
Donald
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2451
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Canada

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by Donald »

linecrew wrote:
Liquid Charlie wrote:
While I agree to your line of thought, it's not relevant to this incident.
-- I did mention grooved runway :smt040
The airport has never had grooved runways since they were built back in the 50's and you'd be hard pressed to find incidents of aircraft sliding off (outside of winter ops) except in the last handful of years.
07/25 is in fact grooved, it was done after it was re-paved recently.

And it has made a tremendous difference on rainy days.
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1900
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y

Post by linecrew »

Donald wrote:
07/25 is in fact grooved, it was done after it was re-paved recently.

And it has made a tremendous difference on rainy days.
Yeah...they grooved it because the *same company* ran an exact same type of aircraft off the end of Runway 07 in 2010: http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/medias-media/c ... 130613.asp

I still question how this is now suddenly considered a huge safety enhancement when, up until just recently, aircraft operated safely on these runways without the aid of grooving for several decades.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”