United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in YOW
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
- Brantford Beech Boy
- Rank 7

- Posts: 668
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:34 am
- Location: Brantford? Not so much...
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
Huh,
unstabilized approach and non-adherrance to SOPs....
Where have I heard that recently?
BBB
unstabilized approach and non-adherrance to SOPs....
Where have I heard that recently?
BBB
"Almost anywhere, almost anytime...worldwide(ish)"
-
Liquid Charlie
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1461
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:40 am
- Location: YXL
- Contact:
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
Nations capital and not even a cat2 runway -only in Canader you say-pity
Black Air has no Lift - Extra Fuel has no Weight
ACTPA
ACTPA
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
Ottawa is not busy enough nor is the weather often poor enough to require a CAT II.Liquid Charlie wrote:Nations capital and not even a cat2 runway -only in Canader you say-pity
-
Liquid Charlie
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1461
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:40 am
- Location: YXL
- Contact:
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
that has to be one of the silliest replies i have ever read and I must say typical canadian aviation thinking -- spend millions on putting shops and bars into an airport terminal and not spend a cent on improving operational facilities -- like a grooved runway and a cat 2 landing -- seems that places like Europe figure it's good policy and airports far less busy that Ottawa have it -- I'm sure wpg has no more "bad"wx than ottawa -- go figure -- only in canader -- sillyOttawa is not busy enough nor is the weather often poor enough to require a CAT II.
Black Air has no Lift - Extra Fuel has no Weight
ACTPA
ACTPA
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
While I agree to your line of thought, it's not relevant to this incident.spend millions on putting shops and bars into an airport terminal and not spend a cent on improving operational facilities
-
Liquid Charlie
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1461
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:40 am
- Location: YXL
- Contact:
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
-- I did mention grooved runwayWhile I agree to your line of thought, it's not relevant to this incident.
Black Air has no Lift - Extra Fuel has no Weight
ACTPA
ACTPA
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
+1Liquid Charlie wrote:that has to be one of the silliest replies i have ever read and I must say typical canadian aviation thinking -- spend millions on putting shops and bars into an airport terminal and not spend a cent on improving operational facilities -- like a grooved runway and a cat 2 landing -- seems that places like Europe figure it's good policy and airports far less busy that Ottawa have it -- I'm sure wpg has no more "bad"wx than ottawa -- go figure -- only in canader -- sillyOttawa is not busy enough nor is the weather often poor enough to require a CAT II.
In Europe almost every village, town, and city has an ILS and most of the larger cities are set up with Cat IIIb facilities. After the ILS is installed, the associated ground infrastructure is the least expensive part of it. Tho it will take NavCanada 2 years to publish the plate...
-
linecrew
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
- Location: On final so get off the damn runway!
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
The airport has never had grooved runways since they were built back in the 50's and you'd be hard pressed to find incidents of aircraft sliding off (outside of winter ops) except in the last handful of years.Liquid Charlie wrote:-- I did mention grooved runwayWhile I agree to your line of thought, it's not relevant to this incident.
Are some modern aircraft like the early model ERJs not able to handle this type of runway surface? Is it the calibre of crews flying in there? I just don't get how this has 'suddenly' become a problem.
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
It seems odd to select maximum thrust for 7 seconds at 5 feet AGL. Shouldn't they have either just let the aircraft settle onto the runway, or else fully committed to a go-around?
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
Lack of experience is the reason here. 2 reasons that stand out are;
1. In a storm with high winds they selected full flap coming through 1000'. Now your changing configuration in deteriorating weather conditions. Can anyone say unstable approach already.
2. Max reverse selected while aircraft is in the air. (Selected max reverse at 5' agl for 7 seconds), sry you hit reverse while in the air....If you wanna do this do a go around, obviously your already worried.
1. In a storm with high winds they selected full flap coming through 1000'. Now your changing configuration in deteriorating weather conditions. Can anyone say unstable approach already.
2. Max reverse selected while aircraft is in the air. (Selected max reverse at 5' agl for 7 seconds), sry you hit reverse while in the air....If you wanna do this do a go around, obviously your already worried.
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
I think that was max thrust not max reverse thrustflyinhigh wrote:Lack of experience is the reason here. 2 reasons that stand out are;
1. In a storm with high winds they selected full flap coming through 1000'. Now your changing configuration in deteriorating weather conditions. Can anyone say unstable approach already.
2. Max reverse selected while aircraft is in the air. (Selected max reverse at 5' agl for 7 seconds), sry you hit reverse while in the air....If you wanna do this do a go around, obviously your already worried.
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
Yes, and the report says the aircraft wasn't equipped with reverse thrust (and that was a factor in the overrun).av8ts wrote:I think that was max thrust not max reverse thrustflyinhigh wrote:Lack of experience is the reason here. 2 reasons that stand out are;
1. In a storm with high winds they selected full flap coming through 1000'. Now your changing configuration in deteriorating weather conditions. Can anyone say unstable approach already.
2. Max reverse selected while aircraft is in the air. (Selected max reverse at 5' agl for 7 seconds), sry you hit reverse while in the air....If you wanna do this do a go around, obviously your already worried.
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
07/25 is in fact grooved, it was done after it was re-paved recently.linecrew wrote:The airport has never had grooved runways since they were built back in the 50's and you'd be hard pressed to find incidents of aircraft sliding off (outside of winter ops) except in the last handful of years.Liquid Charlie wrote:-- I did mention grooved runwayWhile I agree to your line of thought, it's not relevant to this incident.
And it has made a tremendous difference on rainy days.
-
linecrew
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
- Location: On final so get off the damn runway!
Re: United Express (opr by Trans States) runway overrun in Y
Yeah...they grooved it because the *same company* ran an exact same type of aircraft off the end of Runway 07 in 2010: http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/medias-media/c ... 130613.aspDonald wrote:
07/25 is in fact grooved, it was done after it was re-paved recently.
And it has made a tremendous difference on rainy days.
I still question how this is now suddenly considered a huge safety enhancement when, up until just recently, aircraft operated safely on these runways without the aid of grooving for several decades.



