Foreign pilots: a few questions to Transport Canada

[I read not write]

Gilles

Do you still feel the same way towards the Wet Leased Czech pilots that will be flying your passengers and do you still feel strongly about going to the media regarding the "pay to fly" 200 hour under-paid pilots that will be flying for your company.

You had many for transport Canada regarding these pilots who have failed Canadian PPC, who returned to fly the wet leased aircraft. What if these same plot will be flying for your company this year? Do you feel as though you should expose this fact to the media and take the chance that this could negatively affect the publics view on the company you work for?

I think we all know how the public would view this. Would you now stand up against your management for bringing in what you consider to be unsafe pilots. You do have another thread regarding "pilots who pay to fly" and your views are negative towards them. It is a known fact that there are some pilots at Travel Service who pay to fly.

Bottom line is. What is your position now on the topic, since you have confirmed that your company will be using these same pilots?

[Gilles Hudicourt]

Deleted

[I read not write]

Gilles

I am sorry but you have a very unique way of difflecting the question and really turning everything back towards SWG.

I asked a question regarding the use of Czech pilots flying wet leased airplanes for your company. Nothing to do with SWG. You had a strong negative opinion towards the Travel Service pilots which you posted on several times in the past.

I think that most of us really would like to see what you and your colleagues will do about it now that the people who sign your pay check are now involved in a situation that you were very much against.

You have been asked the question over and over, but like I mentioned when I first started posting, I am neither against you or with you. I think most of us are just very curious to see what you and you supporters will do if you have to put up a fight against your own employer instead of the competitor.

[Gilles Hudicourt]

I think that most of us really would like to see what you and your colleagues will do about it now that the people who sign your pay check are now involved in a situation that you were very much against.

You have been asked the question over and over, but like I mentioned when I first started posting, I am neither against you or with you. I think most of us are just very curious to see what you and you supporters will do if y.

So you are just a spectator in some reality show that you really enjoy ?
You have no identity, no opinion, do not have a position, but you feel you can ask my opinion and suggest what I should do ?

[I read not write]

Like I said. We are similar in many ways. Take what you want from that. You are not the only person in this world that can hold an ATPL and pass a pic every six months.

So if you are going to "fight the good fight," do it proudly for all of us not just when it is in your favour. That is what you have been promoting for years.

[I read not write]

you really manage to deflect the question and turn this into a name calling fight between us. I will say again. I an NOT against you and some of your views. But if you are going to put your name out there as the leader of a group that is trying to fix an area in Our profession that requires attention, I suggest you do it with integrity. Trust is needed amongst us and it's fading fast with certain developments. I can see it getting worse in the near future