mbav8r wrote:Is that supposed to be some reference to how Bush pronounced it, I hope so at least!FOD wrote:It's pronounced Nucular N-U-C-U-L-A-R
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoASZyihalc
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
mbav8r wrote:Is that supposed to be some reference to how Bush pronounced it, I hope so at least!FOD wrote:It's pronounced Nucular N-U-C-U-L-A-R
Rockie wrote:Yeah, that's my argument. A 12 year old has better self control than Trump.FOD wrote:A cell phone and the "nuclear briefcase". That's your argument.
Nuclear weapons FOD. Say it with me:
N-U-C-L-E-A-R W-E-A-P-O-N-S.
No doubt that's how Trump spells it. Shouldn't he show some ability to spell it before he launches one?FOD wrote:It's pronounced Nucular N-U-C-U-L-A-R
Too late - he's already escaped to Russia http://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/st ... -1.3834654FOD wrote:Seriously,
Don't worry, if he gets out of control I think Steven Segal is still kicking around somewhere. TV taught me that he can save us if worse comes to worst.
FOD
In other words just about as much as any other political development.Rockie wrote:International agreements of every kind are subject to cancellation or renegotiation by the most nationalistic/anti-trade leader the US has seen. Trump is going to try and undo something that is woven irrevocably deep into this modern world we live in. There are going to be huge economic consequences that WILL affect aviation along with everything else.B208 wrote:1.). What does this have to do with Canadian Aviation?
Nope. Hillary was backed by the Saudi's. Just like Bush Jr was (remember him, he went in and started this whole mess by taking out Saddam for no good reason other than the Saudis wanted it.) The Saudi's want the Iranians taken out. If Hillary was elected we would have been in for Gulf War III, except this time it would have involved the Russians. Also, if you want to believe a simple document will hold the Iranians back from building nuclear weapons, so be it. I don't.Rockie wrote:Since Trump wants to tear up the only agreement holding Iran's nuclear weapon development program in check he's actually making war with Iran more likely.B208 wrote:2.) Trump will be far less damaging than Hillary. I suspect that we just dodged war with Iran.
Plenty got done. Race relations are worse than they've been since the civil rights movement. The police are afraid to do their jobs. The middle east has completely imploded. Thank the good lord the Republicans blocked Obama as much as they did.Rockie wrote: Why do you think nothing got done in the last six years of Obama's administration?
I think you are confusing Trump with Black Lives Matter.Rockie wrote: Trump represents chaos and anarchy - it's why he was voted in.
Was this from the same pollsters who said Hillary was going to win?Rockie wrote: Did you know there was a poll taken where 22% of Trump supporters actually thought he might start a nuclear war, and they still voted for him.
I find the self importance Canadians carry rather amusing. We are, roughly as significant as Belgium. How often do you wonder about Belgium? It's a big world folks.complexintentions wrote:Unfortunately, what happens to Canada as a consequence of the US election is not very high on the list of what American voters worry about.
For whatever reason Canadians always love to look down on the US, but I agree - Canada is about to find out just how dependent it is on the US - economically, militarily, socially.
timel wrote:I just don't get it.
It is amazing to see the vote results for Trump, 8% Black, 30% Latino and Asians, the balance is all white. Let's Make White America Great Again.
No more hugs for Justin.complexintentions wrote:I hope Trudeau wears his pink anti-bullying shirt when he's negotiating whatever deal he's forced to after Trump rips up NAFTA.
I somehow think there won't be any cozy selfie-fests at the White House like there were with Obama.
Now that is aviation related.cgzro wrote:On an aviation note this will lower the price of oil in the US, eliminate any aviation carbon dioxide taxes and reduce corporate taxes giving US long haul flights a big advantage over Canadian. Wont that hurt Air Canada? Its already hard for me to justify AC for the 15hr flights but it may become impossible.
Also I presume the 100LL phase out may get postponed as the EPA gets reorged?
Actually, I would say that the Hillary supporters(and I suspect you as well) fall into that category to a much greater degree as can be easily proved...if I particularly wanted to.Rockie wrote:
Forgive me but that is grasping at a straw. A few points:
1. The Republican party has been hijacked completely by the racist, extremist fringe .......
4. ...... So Trump is going to either do as he says and cater to the xenophobes/bigots/misogynists/nationalists, or he's going to be yet another politician who says one thing but does another. The least frightening one by far is the latter and is the one the rest of the world hopes for. Me, I think he's the former.
Rookie50 wrote:
This is nothing to do with Trump, but a frustrated, angry electorate. Millions and millions of them. Try understanding that, and will make more sense. And not just in the US, but worldwide.
They all wackos? No, this is a movement.
Perhaps millions of voters are tired of being thought of as "deplorables" by the elite class.
No way the oil is going to go up anytime soon and the Canadian housing market is overheated. Let's just hope exportations don't go down with the USA.Rookie50 wrote:Economic basis here are my frank predictions.
Lower Canadian dollar.
Pressure on exporters.
Higher interest / mortgage rates, following theirs, which should do wonders for housing markets.
Translation to all of that: loads of challenges for canadian economy.
This is a very good point.cgzro wrote:On an aviation note this will lower the price of oil in the US, eliminate any aviation carbon dioxide taxes and reduce corporate taxes giving US long haul flights a big advantage over Canadian.
News mentioned that Air Trump 757 costs $16k per flying hour, AF1 costs $206k per flying hour to operate. I think there are savings to be made to their budgetMrWings wrote:I'm most interested if Trump willingly steps down from the opulence of his 757 to the proletariat Air Force One.
1- Clinton was officially against NAI (http://thehill.com/policy/transportatio ... ying-to-us), Trump isn't less of a protectionist, their chances to get DOT's approval are going down everyday in my opinion, except if they manage to get in before the end of Obamas mandate.LittleNelly wrote: Anyway as for actual discussion about impacts on the industry. There are:
1) Gulf carrier and Norwegian access(Protecting american jobs vs consumers)
5) How will new trade policies affect Boeing
If there's one thing the last 15 years have proven it's that the world had a lot to be afraid of with Bush Jr.LittleNelly wrote:Agree with him or dissagree, but there is no reason to be afraid of anything. People were afraid when Bush won, people were afraid when Obama won..... its the same reaction every time. Its just how the new age of polarising politics are.
Maybe the world has been progressing too fast and people are losing touch with what's happening, so they are going for self destruction. It is up to politicians to explain mondialisation to the populations, and it must be done in a responsible way.Rockie wrote: What frightens me the most though are the tens of millions of people in the US that elected him. They'll still be there getting progressively more extreme in their views long after Trump is gone and given the USA's huge economic influence and fearsome military power, that's what makes the United States one of the most dangerous countries in the world IMHO.